I take motivational interviewing to be a collective person-centered remedial practice that seeks to reinforce an individual’s motivation and commitment to change through evoking personal inclinations to reforms in an empathetic and lenient way. It may be practiced alone or together with other modes of therapy with the aim of boosting an individual’s dedication to the required change. In this aspect, motivational interviewing acts as a counseling approach that assists a person in determining ambivalent sentiments and insecurities to gain the internal drive needed to alter their conduct (Miller & Rose, 2015).
Success is realized by its being a practical endeavor that is carried out by sympathetic and devoted professionals who consider the difficulty of making changes in life. Motivational interviewing is usually practiced to tackle addiction such as substance abuse and manage physical conditions, for example, cardiovascular diseases and diabetes.
Studies have established that motivational interviewing works excellently with people who begin unmotivated or not ready for the change. I believe that motivational interviewing is suitable for individuals who are unhappy or hostile. Such people may not be ready to endure change, but motivational interviewing assists them to proceed through the emotional phases of transformation to become motivated (Miller & Rose, 2015).
In a supportive way, a motivational interviewer ought to persuade a client to speak concerning the necessity for change and their personal reasons for seeking reforms. The most important task of the interviewer is evoking a conversation concerning the change in a manner that makes the client open up. It is crucial to engage the client by seeking their ideas on the best approach to initiating the required change.
Reference
Miller, W. R., & Rose, G. S. (2015). Motivational interviewing and decisional balance: Contrasting responses to client ambivalence. Behavioral and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 43(2), 129-141.