Transgender diversity has strongly integrated into the scientific community due to the life- implementation opportunities it provides for scientists. Natural sciences representations have adopted the new trend since it helps better describe the world realities based on fundamental studies. At the same time, from application sciences perspective, transgender studies disclose many possibilities to realize the humans’ potential in the surgery operations domain and overall people’s curing approaches. Even though natural and applied sciences have fundamentally different objectives, they are both interested in analyzing transgender diversity issues in U.S. society with regard to their specialization.
In fact, recent studies demonstrate a dearth of research on how transsexual identity affects behavior and, particularly, the sexual response of another partner. These findings belong to the natural sciences since they tend to describe the world but not develop new elements. More specifically, Raines et al. state that because the sexual reactions of the majority of men and women to pornographic movies depicting men or women are significantly different, we utilized these sexual responses to determine if a person acts in a male-typical or female-typical manner (2021). Consequently, the transgender human analyses have proved the significance of the trans-diversity issue from a biological standpoint. At the end of the studies, authors realized that while transgender males had some female-typical reactions consistent with their feminine birth sex, individuals also demonstrated strong male-typical reactions consistent with their male sex identification. Thus, physiological sexual attraction partially indicates transgender men’s masculine identity for transsexual males (Raines et al., 2021). Even though it is not always evident, but natural sciences are directly interested in developing transgender life in the given boundaries since it provides the exact evidence for many scientific questions that could not be analyzed before.
From the perspective of applied science, transgender diversity problems represent possibilities in the new theories and practices development, especially in medicine. For instance, one study recognized that plastic surgeons had discovered that, indeed, slight surgical modifications might significantly enhance the self-esteem and functionality of transgender representatives (Canner et al., 2018). While these surgeries usually include penile or neovaginal reconstruction, the techniques’ surgical results remain unknown. Additionally, the author state that “only 20% to 40% of transgender individuals seek gender-affirming surgery,” and these numbers are based on questionnaires of a representative sample of transgender people, which considerably limits their generalizability (Canner et al., 2018). As a result, the transgender issue might be even the most perspective field of study for applied sciences representatives since the current situation does not demonstrate even half of the possible surgery market size. Simultaneously, the bigger scale with the higher prices would positively affect the studies’ funding and develop the new analyses concerning this subject.
However, some scientists become concerned about the costs that customers would be obliged to pay for having the qualitative operation of changing the sex. For example, Klein et al. affirm that the analyzing group feels indispensable to contact policymakers in order to develop a plan for covering the uncommon occurrence of preoperative perineal hair removal prior to neo vaginoplasty surgery since the expense of this preoperative necessity might be a substantial barrier to treatment for certain patients. Indeed, the expense of perineal hair removal may surpass Medicaid-eligible individuals’ available resources (2018). At the same time, even though price exposure plays a pivotal role in scientific studies, the general tendency would be to engage the government to provide certain expenditures to incentivize scientists to develop the evidence in the transgender surgery field.
In conclusion, despite the differing purposes, the transgender issue in U.S. society is one of the most perspective fields of study in natural and applied sciences. While the first approach is aimed to describe the world with the help of fundamental knowledge, the second one would experimentally develop a more performative system of human behavior. At the same time, it is critical to correctly distinguish both domains due to their differences in professional approaches so that the scientific studies would successfully derive the needed information about the transgender diversity issue.
In fact, social sciences perspective is the more prominent domain for transgender issues analysis. In particular, this is due to the fact that this phenomenon is mostly influenced by significant shifts in society’s consideration of an untraditional style of living. Since the contemporary world has positively changed transgender representatives’ perceptions, the main issue for this group is not only to continue existence but also to fundamentally develop its integration in society to increase the overall level of welfare.
From a scientific perspective, several efforts have been made to explain the impact of gender diversity on corporate boards on an industry’s financial and economic performance. For instance, Martinez-Jimenez et al. state that some theoretical perspectives such as agency cost theory, the resource-dependency viewpoint, and Becker’s 1964 human capital theory might help to develop the full comprehension of the current problem (2020). At the same time, some scientists emphasize the importance of the multi-stage approach to the issue. More specifically, Gardenswartz et al. affirm that despite all people being indoctrinated into gender-specific behaviors and expectations, gender roles continue to vary throughout time.
In addition, they observe that the same conduct may be seen differently depending on the gender doing it. Simultaneously, the authors concern the gender roles by stating the necessity to accommodate the needs of transgender people through the process of gender reassignment that has gained prominence in recent years (Gardenswartz et al., 2015). As a result, the authors admit the existence of the transgender problem in U.S. society as a whole by providing evidence from workplace studies. They demonstrate one of the examples where a male boss who is aggressive and may be seen as a leader, but a female manager who acts similarly may be perceived as overbearing and arrogant (Gardenswartz et al., 2015). Since there is no precision provided for transgender diversity representatives, they might experience being negatively perceived from both genders’ perspectives. In this case, social sciences helped not only to admit the existence of an issue rather than a single future perspective but also to derive the opportunities for future studies, which plays a pivotal role in addressing transgender diversity in the U.S. society.
In conclusion, the transgender diversity issue is analyzed the most effectively through social perspective since the essence of this phenomenon lies in society’s reconsideration of the gender question. While some studies disclose the necessity of transgender people being equally treated, other ones provide real-life examples of how gender might influence people’s reactions. Finally, it is critical to prevent transgender individuals from being criticized by distinct gender representatives, which is the second big question for social scientists.
References
Canner, J. K., Harfouch, O., Kodadek, L. M., et al. (2018). Temporal Trends in Gender-Affirming Surgery Among Transgender Patients in the United States. JAMA Surgery, 153(7), 609–617. Web.
Gardenswartz, L., & Rowe, A. (2015). The Sage Encyclopedia of Intercultural Competence. SAGE Publications.
Klein, P., Narasimhan, S., & Safer, J. D. (2018). The Boston Medical Center Experience: An Achievable Model for the Delivery of Transgender Medical Care at an Academic Medical Center.Transgender Health, 3(1), 136–140. Web.
Martinez-Jimenez, R., Hernández-Ortiz, M. J., & Cabrera Fernández, A. I. (2020). Gender diversity influence on board effectiveness and business performance.Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(2), 307–323. Web.
Raines, J., Holmes, L., Watts-Overall, T. M., et al., (2021). Patterns of Genital Sexual Arousal in Transgender Men.Psychological Science, 32(4), 485–495. Web.