Osama Bin Laden: Assassination vs. Trial Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

Introduction

President Barack Obama promised the American people that he could hunt and capture Osama bin Laden. These efforts were in relation to the terror he had caused on American soil under the operations of his terrorist group, al-Qaeda. Attacks such as the hijacking of American planes that killed about 3000 people and even those targeting foreign U.S. embassies had caused much havoc to the United States of America (Finegan 475). It was the suffering and pain that Americans underwent that necessitated the raid.

Discussion

The military operation led by the Navy SEALs in raiding bin Laden was not a surprise to many, but it has raised concerns about how it was handled. In my considerations, though, without making any moral judgment, bin Laden should have been dealt with differently. Like in every society where there is law and order and in which there is a right to a fair trial, bin Laden deserved to have stood before a court of law for prosecution. The American government had no power to make an exception to its constitutional guidelines.

Bin Laden’s killing could have been vindicating when it happened, but in retrospect, it reveals itself as a fight on terror pageantry with no regard for the protocols, and it, therefore, demonstrates a terrible precedent. In my thoughts, I believe that the decision to hunt and kill bin Laden was driven by nationalist sentiments due to the terror war and not the considerations of what was morally and constitutionally right. The United States government did not handle him as a criminal of war that should have been brought to justice but rather as a terrorist symbol that it had to prove itself against (Finegan 480).

Conclusion

In conclusion, I do not argue that bin Laden deserved better treatment. He was a terrorist responsible for many deaths and the destruction of property. However, the postulate on his death seems to be a hypocritical revenge scheme, not justice, public safety, and peace as purported.

Work Cited

Finegan, Rory. “Targeted Killings: Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace?.” Routledge Handbook Of Terrorism And Counterterrorism. Routledge, 2018. Pp 471-482.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2023, November 20). Osama Bin Laden: Assassination vs. Trial. https://ivypanda.com/essays/osama-bin-laden-assassination-vs-trial/

Work Cited

"Osama Bin Laden: Assassination vs. Trial." IvyPanda, 20 Nov. 2023, ivypanda.com/essays/osama-bin-laden-assassination-vs-trial/.

References

IvyPanda. (2023) 'Osama Bin Laden: Assassination vs. Trial'. 20 November.

References

IvyPanda. 2023. "Osama Bin Laden: Assassination vs. Trial." November 20, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/osama-bin-laden-assassination-vs-trial/.

1. IvyPanda. "Osama Bin Laden: Assassination vs. Trial." November 20, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/osama-bin-laden-assassination-vs-trial/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Osama Bin Laden: Assassination vs. Trial." November 20, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/osama-bin-laden-assassination-vs-trial/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
1 / 1