Pleading Guilty: Key Motivation Essay

Exclusively available on IvyPanda Available only on IvyPanda

Plea deals have become inherent to the American criminal justice system, replacing trial processes to a considerable extent. According to Finkelstein and Levin (2020), the percentage of defendants pleading guilty in court has increased from 63% to 89% since 1975. This sticking growth can be attributed to various factors, most notoriously to the so-called “trial penalty.”

We will write a custom essay on your topic a custom Essay on Pleading Guilty: Key Motivation
808 writers online

While refraining from a time-consuming trial has economic benefits, i.e., freeing limited resources for courts, opting to plead guilty has inevitable repercussions. Pleading guilty is often incentivized by proposing a more lenient sentence instead of an overly harsh one (Schneider & Zottoli, 2019). For example, in U.S. v. Stinn, the defendant refused to plead guilty for a fraud committed by his colleagues, but, although the government admitted that Stinn was unaware of the crime, he was ultimately sentenced to 12 years instead of an initially proposed maximum 5-year sentence. In contrast, the actual perpetrators who plead guilty received no jail time and were recommended for parole (National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, 2018). Such an approach allows for indirect coercion as it pressures a defendant to hastily concede their right to a trial to avoid a disproportionately longer sentence.

The ungrounded choice to accept a plea bargain can also stem from an imbalance of negotiation power. The prosecutor often has informational leverage on the defendant, as they are not obliged to present information to the latter. (National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, 2018). As a result, the defendant and their legal counsel often do not manage to properly assess the prosecutor’s claim due to the plea’s urgency and its disparity with the potential trial sentence.

Overall, though having certain merits, the plea bargaining system poses several ethical problems. The defenders are often presented with a dilemma, being forced to choose between “two evils.” Fear of a harsher sentence as an incentive is unacceptable as it only punishes the innocent.

References

Finkelstein, M. O., & Levin, B. (2020). . Significance, 17(1), 20–25. Web.

National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. (2018). The trial penalty: The Sixth Amendment right to trial on the verge of extinction and how to save it. Web.

Schneider, R. A., & Zottoli, T. M. (2019). . Legal and Criminological Psychology, 24, 288–304. Web.

1 hour!
The minimum time our certified writers need to deliver a 100% original paper
Print
Need an custom research paper on Pleading Guilty: Key Motivation written from scratch by a professional specifically for you?
808 writers online
Cite This paper
Select a referencing style:

Reference

IvyPanda. (2022, November 3). Pleading Guilty: Key Motivation. https://ivypanda.com/essays/pleading-guilty-key-motivation/

Work Cited

"Pleading Guilty: Key Motivation." IvyPanda, 3 Nov. 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/pleading-guilty-key-motivation/.

References

IvyPanda. (2022) 'Pleading Guilty: Key Motivation'. 3 November.

References

IvyPanda. 2022. "Pleading Guilty: Key Motivation." November 3, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/pleading-guilty-key-motivation/.

1. IvyPanda. "Pleading Guilty: Key Motivation." November 3, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/pleading-guilty-key-motivation/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Pleading Guilty: Key Motivation." November 3, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/pleading-guilty-key-motivation/.

Powered by CiteTotal, free citation creator
If you are the copyright owner of this paper and no longer wish to have your work published on IvyPanda. Request the removal
More related papers
Cite
Print
1 / 1