Policing and the Bill of Rights: Supreme Court Cases Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

There are several cases which have been brought before the Supreme Court that deal with relationships between policing and the bill of rights. These rulings have set precedents on the way police officers are expected to apply the law in their duties. In the United States v. Jones case, the placement of a GPS device under a suspect’s car was interpreted as a violation of the Fourth amendment by the Supreme Court. Judges argued that the surveillance done by police officers was unlawful because they trespassed on Jones’ personal property which violated his privacy (Chechak). They relied on the United States v. Katz case to rule that the officers should have observed reasonable limits of privacy before carrying out the surveillance.

The Howes v. Fields case focused on how the Miranda principle is applied by law enforcement officers when they are questioning people. Fields, the defendant had been questioned by sheriff deputies who did not read him his Miranda rights before his incarceration. Supreme Court judges ruled that confinement of a person by police officers does not mean he has officially been charged with a crime. In the Smith v. Cain case, the ability of a witness to recollect crucial facts accurately in a homicide trial was put to the test (Chechak). Juan Smith had been charged as the main defendant even though the prosecution’s main witness, Larry Boatner had written a testimony that stated he did not remember how the assailants looked like. Boatner’s verbal testimony during trial hearings was contradictory because he claimed that Smith was one of the people who attacked him that night. Judges ruled that the prosecution had violated the Brady principle because they failed to produce Boatner’s written statement in court.

In the Messerschmidt v. Millender civil case, the defendant argued that a police search on her property violated her Fourth Amendment rights to privacy. Officers involved alleged that the doctrine of qualified immunity shielded them from any legal liabilities related to the search on Millender’s house (Chechak). The Supreme Court reversed an earlier ruling and argued that the principle of qualified immunity shielded the police from the civil suit. Judges ruled that the officers were enforcing a legal warrant as required by the law. In the United States v. Alvarez case, the defendant was charged with making false statements. In a speech, he had claimed he was a genuine Congressional Medal of Honor recipient. The court ruled that even though his comments were false, they were not defamatory because they did not harm anyone.

Works Cited

Chechak, Kevin. “Supreme Court Cases.” FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin Nov. 2012. Web.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2022, April 18). Policing and the Bill of Rights: Supreme Court Cases. https://ivypanda.com/essays/policing-and-the-bill-of-rights-supreme-court-cases/

Work Cited

"Policing and the Bill of Rights: Supreme Court Cases." IvyPanda, 18 Apr. 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/policing-and-the-bill-of-rights-supreme-court-cases/.

References

IvyPanda. (2022) 'Policing and the Bill of Rights: Supreme Court Cases'. 18 April.

References

IvyPanda. 2022. "Policing and the Bill of Rights: Supreme Court Cases." April 18, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/policing-and-the-bill-of-rights-supreme-court-cases/.

1. IvyPanda. "Policing and the Bill of Rights: Supreme Court Cases." April 18, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/policing-and-the-bill-of-rights-supreme-court-cases/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Policing and the Bill of Rights: Supreme Court Cases." April 18, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/policing-and-the-bill-of-rights-supreme-court-cases/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
Privacy Settings

IvyPanda uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance your experience, enabling functionalities such as:

  • Basic site functions
  • Ensuring secure, safe transactions
  • Secure account login
  • Remembering account, browser, and regional preferences
  • Remembering privacy and security settings
  • Analyzing site traffic and usage
  • Personalized search, content, and recommendations
  • Displaying relevant, targeted ads on and off IvyPanda

Please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy for detailed information.

Required Cookies & Technologies
Always active

Certain technologies we use are essential for critical functions such as security and site integrity, account authentication, security and privacy preferences, internal site usage and maintenance data, and ensuring the site operates correctly for browsing and transactions.

Site Customization

Cookies and similar technologies are used to enhance your experience by:

  • Remembering general and regional preferences
  • Personalizing content, search, recommendations, and offers

Some functions, such as personalized recommendations, account preferences, or localization, may not work correctly without these technologies. For more details, please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy.

Personalized Advertising

To enable personalized advertising (such as interest-based ads), we may share your data with our marketing and advertising partners using cookies and other technologies. These partners may have their own information collected about you. Turning off the personalized advertising setting won't stop you from seeing IvyPanda ads, but it may make the ads you see less relevant or more repetitive.

Personalized advertising may be considered a "sale" or "sharing" of the information under California and other state privacy laws, and you may have the right to opt out. Turning off personalized advertising allows you to exercise your right to opt out. Learn more in IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy.

1 / 1