The solution offered by the State Union and Workforce Advisor is the most practical and advantageous for everybody, based on the proposed options and circumstances. He suggests wearing masks and supporting enforced social separation but not mandating COVID vaccination for government personnel or students. Instead of getting vaccinated against COVID, the consultant insists on getting immunized and enabling government personnel to be checked monthly for COVID. According to the projections connected with this technique, public health, and safety would only improve modestly, and the virus’s transmission rate will likely stay high. The supply of medical services, on the other hand, is likely to lessen the state’s legal liability.
The practicality of this approach lies in the fact that, firstly, hasty decisions aimed at solving the problem do not make sense. What other advisers are proposing can and will have some effect, but it deprives me, as governor, of the opportunity to be re-elected (Wilder-Smith et al. 106). Moreover, my competitor will likely lift all or part of the epidemic prevention restrictions to earn social approval (Wilder-Smith et al. 105). Thus, by introducing harsh measures, or half-measures proposed by other advisers, I can only worsen the state in the future (Eng Koon 90). However, the course of action that I have chosen will secure my place as governor to make sure that in the future, when I receive the post, I will introduce more practical measures. A systematic strategy and a place secured by legitimate elections will effectively deal with the consequences of the pandemic in the future. Thus, the approach proposed by the SUWA is the most practical and promising for everybody.
Works Cited
Eng Koon, Ong. “The Impact of Sociocultural Influences on the COVID-19 Measures—Reflections From Singapore.” Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, vol. 60, no. 2, 2020, pp. 90–92. Crossref, doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.04.022.
Wilder-Smith, Annelies, et al. “Can We Contain the COVID-19 Outbreak With the Same Measures as for SARS?” The Lancet Infectious Diseases, vol. 20, no. 5, 2020, pp. 102–07. Crossref, doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30129-8.