Introduction
To begin with, it is necessary to mention, that Public Administration can be broadly described as the development, implementation, and study of branches of government policy. Public Administration is linked to pursuing the public good by enhancing civil society and social justice. Though public administration has historically been referred to as government management, it increasingly encompasses Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) that are not acting out of self-interest.
Suggestion
Taking into account the ethics of the occurred situation, it is necessary to mention the theory of the influence of ethics on Public Administration by William Mosber. The residual complexity in managing public service ethical issues is a result of the power and authority that government usually has over people. As a result, the leftover ethical matters are usually connected to the matters of government treatment of people. These essential expectations of proper treatment obtain from the basic notion of rights, stipulated in the constitution, and expand to wider anticipation on the matters of human rights. As all the following and deeper rights are grounded essentially on the Human Rights, the fact is that, only the qualified person may occupy the consultation positions. The described case reveals the significant demerit in the system of public administration, as the scheme of rank transfer is absolutely incomplete, as the reconfirmation and the appointment of the other person on the heading job may be got round just by postponing the solving of the matter.
As for the delegation, and the matters of revealing the trouble to the journalists, another relevant theory suits this case. Some researchers state, that citizens are usually rather skeptical of the press, and the times, when the credit of trust was absolutely unrestricted for mass media had irrevocably passed, as well as the government, and they also argue, that inexact press information advances this skepticism. For instance, Stanyer states, that in the Iraq conflict, due to the media’s necessity to be competitive, velocity was generally more significant, than precision. The data, that media was getting from the government was generally scrappy, and sometimes intentionally deformed. Often, journalists did not have the time to confirm the data they get. While, it is realizable that mistakes had been made, mainly as different media resources aimed to be the first news association to inform of something, as withdrawals and alterations were exceptional, the media left the notion that they did not take any care of the matters of accuracy. That is why there is no need to take care of the delegation and try to invent some reasonable explanations. The fact is that journalists would take anything, as they need to promote their issuing, but the only demerit is that everything that is said may be used against the person, who represents the public administration institution. Here goes another theory, stating the capacity of the press to take anything, and expand it on the pages of the publication. It all happens because of the reasons stated above, and proving, that mass media had lost its credit of trust because of its own fault.
Conclusion
Here goes the conclusion, that the appeared problem is to be solved only internally, but it will be impossible not to contact the mass media representatives in order to explain the problem, and “feed” them with reasonable explanations.