Home > Free Essays > Health & Medicine > Diagnostics > Reasons for Interpreting Screening Tests Results with Caution
Rate

Reasons for Interpreting Screening Tests Results with Caution Argumentative Essay

Exclusively available on IvyPanda Available only on IvyPanda
Updated: Jun 3rd, 2019

Introduction

People normally go for screening tests for specific reasons. There are different health related conditions at the family level that members may test. Screening tests enable families comprehend health related conditions in their lineages. Furthermore, screening generates accurate information, which informs patients decision-making processed. The results emerging from screening processes are crucial to clients.

The interpretation of screening results is also crucial to providing clients with accurate information regarding their health conditions. Evidently, challenges associated with interpreting screening results are imminent. This increases the requirement that people interpret screening results with caution. In the subsequent sections, this paper discusses the reasons for excising caution while interpreting test results

Possibilities for a false-positive result and a false-negative result

Every family anticipates that screening should generate accurate information. However, screening outcome may hinder health related decision making in certain situations. Screening results may defectively discriminate between clients with disease and those without. This can happen when the outcome is incoherent with the actual clinical condition of client.

The challenge may also emerge because of improper integration of screening outcome within the clinical contexts (Marotz & Allen, 2013). Therefore, an imperfect screening test may erroneously categorize a healthy client as diseased.

This creates the false – positive result situation. On the contrary, it may also erroneously identify a sick client as disease – free (Marotz & Allen, 2013). This creates the false – negative result situation. There is the need for people in charge of screening processes to practice caution while interpreting results.

The recognition that inherent operating characteristics of screening processes may generate inaccurate outcome requires caution (Marotz & Allen, 2013). The ability of screening processes to ensure accuracy in excluding or including disease on a client may be prone to errors. This is a genuine reason demanding caution while reading screening results.

The Role of Screening Tools

Several tools are applicable in screening processes. Generally, people in charge of screening processes regard the tools as perfect. However, some screening tools may have defects and problems leading to failures. The screening tools that have defects may not generate accurate outcome. For example, instruments employed in cognitive measurements may fail to generate accurate outcome (Spencer, Bornholt & Ouvrier, 2003).

Furthermore, people in charge of the screening processes may openly abuse such tools thus affecting their accuracy. In addition, using screening tools designed for larger populations to test individuals may prompt cautious in the interpretation of outcome (Spencer, Bornholt & Ouvrier, 2003).

These concerns make it worth for people tasked with conducting screening processes to exercise precaution. They need to exercise precaution on the interpretation of screening outcome.

The prevalence of disease

It is notable that sometimes specialists are interested in conducting screening tests for specific diseases among people in a population. The specialists recognize that the popularity of a disease within a particular population significantly affects screening test effectiveness (Marotz & Allen, 2013). It is notable that very good screening tests may have reduced extrapolative value positives in areas of low disease incidence.

This normally presents additional challenges because people in charge of screening should have familiarity of the estimated disease incidence while interpreting screening outcome (Ore, Tamir, Stein & Cohen-Dar, 2009). This is also a concern requiring people to exercise caution while interpreting screening outcome.

Conclusion

The above discussions relates to the reasons why people should exercise caution while interpreting screening outcome. The possibility of screening results generating a false – positive and false – negative outcome necessitates caution. Furthermore, the inaccuracy of screening tools as well as disease incidence may affect screening outcome.

References

Marotz, L. R., & Allen, K. E. (2013). Developmental Profiles: Pre-Birth through adolescence (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

Ore, L., Tamir, A., Stein, N., & Cohen-Dar, M. (2009). Reliability of vision screening tests for school children. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 41(3), 250-259. Doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2009.01283.x

Spencer, F. H., Bornholt, L. J., & Ouvrier, R. A. (2003). Test reliability and stability of children’s cognitive functioning. Journal of Child Neurology, 18(1), 5-11.

This argumentative essay on Reasons for Interpreting Screening Tests Results with Caution was written and submitted by your fellow student. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly.
Removal Request
If you are the copyright owner of this paper and no longer wish to have your work published on IvyPanda.
Request the removal

Need a custom Argumentative Essay sample written from scratch by
professional specifically for you?

Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar

certified writers online

Cite This paper
Select a referencing style:

Reference

IvyPanda. (2019, June 3). Reasons for Interpreting Screening Tests Results with Caution. Retrieved from https://ivypanda.com/essays/reasons-for-interpreting-screening-tests-results-with-caution/

Work Cited

"Reasons for Interpreting Screening Tests Results with Caution." IvyPanda, 3 June 2019, ivypanda.com/essays/reasons-for-interpreting-screening-tests-results-with-caution/.

1. IvyPanda. "Reasons for Interpreting Screening Tests Results with Caution." June 3, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/reasons-for-interpreting-screening-tests-results-with-caution/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Reasons for Interpreting Screening Tests Results with Caution." June 3, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/reasons-for-interpreting-screening-tests-results-with-caution/.

References

IvyPanda. 2019. "Reasons for Interpreting Screening Tests Results with Caution." June 3, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/reasons-for-interpreting-screening-tests-results-with-caution/.

References

IvyPanda. (2019) 'Reasons for Interpreting Screening Tests Results with Caution'. 3 June.

More related papers
Psst... Stuck with your
assignment? 😱
Hellen
Online
Psst... Stuck with your assignment? 😱
Do you need an essay to be done?
What type of assignment 📝 do you need?
How many pages (words) do you need? Let's see if we can help you!