The lack of enthusiasm in adhering to the principles of a healthy lifestyle has been the reason for concern for an impressive amount of time. In the United States, the issue in question has been growing out of proportion recently, with the rates of obesity increasing exponentially (2016). Therefore, a framework for promoting a change in the levels of physical activity and nutrition among the target demographic is required.
In their study, Bogna Grygiel-Górniak et al. (2016) address the problems of introducing students of a medical university to the idea of proper eating habits due to the issues associated with the schedule and low physical activity levels. Although the specified article can be regarded as an attempt to attract the attention of a wide audience due to the topicality of the subject matter, the article can be seen as thought-provoking and impactful due to its use of reasoning, the careful choice of language, and the elaborate structure that the paper follows.
The outcomes of the study point to the necessity to modify dietary habits in the target demographic, as well as the need to combine a low-carbohydrate diet with intense exercises. The author uses language to present the argument in a very academic way, thus proving that the study was made with a thoughtful approach and a set of well-developed goals. For instance, Grygiel-Górniak et al. (2016) conclude at some point that “in both groups, overconsumption of protein was observed and intake of animal protein dominated over the intake of plant protein, and this was significantly higher in M (Table 1; Fig. 1)” (p. 263).
The language that the authors utilize in the specified sentence is highly academic, not simply due to the word choice, although it also matters significantly, but also because of the structure, particularly the use of the Passive Voice and the comparisons in it. As a result, the paper by Grygiel-Górniak et al. (2016) becomes very convincing and develops a strong voice, thus persuading the audience to trust the statements that it makes.
Similarly, the organization of data is used to prompt a discussion of the research results and allow readers to go through the entire process of analyzing the collected information to reach the same conclusion as the authors of the study. Particularly, Grygiel-Górniak et al. (2016) start the description of the results with the variables that were considered in the study, proceeding to the exploration of the outcomes.
The analysis, in turn, begins with the brief statement of general findings that are further expanded to show details of the discoveries made by the authors. Grygiel-Górniak et al. (2016) guide their readers through the analysis carefully, ensuring that every step of the discussion is clear and well-developed. As a result, the outcomes of the research become evident to the reader as Grygiel-Górniak et al. (2016) discuss them and analyze their implications for the further exploration of the problem.
In addition, the argument made by Grygiel-Górniak et al. (2016) exemplifies a perfect use of evidence. Each statement that the researchers incorporated into the discussion section is supported extensively by the information acquired in the course of the analysis or located incredible sources. As a result, Grygiel-Górniak et al. (2016) make a rather valid point in their assessment of the research results and the analysis of their meaning for the target audience.
For instance, at some point in their analysis, Grygiel-Górniak et al. (2016) assert that “In both groups, the percentage of energy obtained from carbohydrates was low and did not reach a minimum of 55 % of energy” (p. 265). The identified claim is based purely on the results of the analysis conducted in the course of the study, which makes it a very legitimate statement. However, it could be argued that the identified section could be improved by introducing the interpretation of the findings and explaining what they mean for the target demographic. Therefore, overall, the study can be described as adequate, although possibly lacking in an especially profound insight into the subject matter.
The structure of the article is also rather basic, with the theme and the review of the existing evidence introduced at the beginning with the research question and objectives, and followed by the methodology, data analysis, discussion, and conclusion. The specified structure helps make arguments flow naturally and allows the reader to follow the train of logical conclusions made by the authors. Therefore, the chosen approach toward the analysis is quite reasonable.
Furthermore, the paper provides a response to a very important academic context. Specifically, Grygiel-Górniak et al. (2016) address the increasing concern regarding a healthy lifestyle. Particularly, the failure among a range of students to follow the principles of healthy eating and exercising due to a tight academic schedule and budget constraints is rendered in the study. The authors are affiliated with the Poznan University of Medical Sciences, which adds extra credibility to their writing.
While the topic that the article renders may have lost its novelty, it is the combination of sensible and clear arguments, well-developed structure, and the use of simple yet academic language that makes the article compelling.
The authors provide a range of valid points, yet their significance and weight would have been lost unless the rhetoric of the paper had been so well-written. The elaborate use of language devices and the appeal to its target audiences make the article a perfect representation of a profound study that contributes to an improvement in the eating habits of the vulnerable population. Therefore, the paper can be considered a very significant addition to the existing discussion of the role of nutrition and physical activity in people’s well-being.
Reference
Grygiel-Górniak, B., Tomczak, A., Krulikowska, N., Przysławski, J., Seraszek-Jaros, A., & Kaczmarek, E. (2016). Physical activity, nutritional status, and dietary habits of students of a medical university. Sport Sciences for Health, 12(2), 261-267. Web.