Analysis of the Models
Many scholars believe that the Social Change Model (SCM) is one of the most practical leadership approaches. The model has the potential “to improve a person’s leadership practices” (Haber and Komives 138). It focuses on three principles or aspects to produce the best results. Such principles include “community or society, group, and the individual” (Komives and Wagner 12). Leaders should concentrate on their capabilities.
They should also focus on the values of their groups. According to the model, groups should embrace the best societal values to achieve their goals. This model explains how different national cultural practices and leadership approaches emerge. Employees can use this model “to embrace specific roles through the context of their organizations” (Whitney 3). Individuals in a given community will create similar values and practices.
On the other hand, servant leadership is a powerful approach characterized by various practices. Such practices are usually aimed at enriching, supporting, and improving the outcomes of many organizations (Smith 8). Servant leaders tend to promote the best behaviors in an attempt to create a better world. Servant leaders embrace ten specific principles to realize their potentials. These principles include “healing, listening, empathy, awareness, persuasion, conceptualization, building community, commitment to growth, stewardship, foresight, and conceptualization” (Spears 27).
These principles make it possible for leaders to nurture their talents. The principles also make it easier for them to deal with various problems. The practice makes it possible for different leaders to support their organizational objectives. They also make evidence-based decisions based on every past event.
How Are the Two Models Related?
The above models of leadership offer powerful insights that can redefine the performance of many organizations. To begin with, the Social Change Model encourages leaders to embrace collaborative relationships to produce the best organizational values (Komives and Wagner 19). The model also promotes the concept of collectivism. This practice will result in new organizational values. The leader will create new groups to support every organizational goal.
Such groups will embrace specific organizational values. The concept of congruence increases the performance of different groups or individuals. Similar concepts are also embraced by the servant leadership model. According to servant leadership theory, leaders should create awareness to build the best organizations or communities. The theory also supports the power of groups. Every group will be committed to producing the best results.
These two models also focus on similar values and results (Smith 9). For instance, leaders should examine the present positions and future expectations of their organization. They should use the power of stewardship to promote the best institutional practices. The theories also focus on growth. These two models will eventually improve the performance of many firms.
The theories interface with each other. This is the case because the models focus on the same organizational outcomes and values. The theories encourage more leaders to create new groups to produce successful communities. The discussion shows clearly that the models can be applied in different settings. Servant leadership should therefore be studied as an expansion of the Social Change Model. The above ten principles also offer powerful personal competencies that can support the needs of different groups (Buschlen and Dvorak 42). The targeted groups can be empowered through conceptualization and stewardship. The leader will be committed to growth to build a successful company.
Works Cited
Buschlen, Eric and Robert Dvorak. “The Social Change Model as Pedagogy: Examining Undergraduate Leadership Growth.” Journal of Leadership Education 10.2 (2011): 38-56. Print.
Haber, Paige and Susan Komives. “Predicting the Individual Values of the Social Change Model of Leadership Development: The Role of College Students’ Leadership and Involvement Experiences.” Journal of Leadership Education 7.3 (2009): 133-166. Print.
Komives, Susan, and Wendy Wagner. Leadership for a Better World: Understanding the Social Change Model of Leadership Development. New York: Jossey-Bass, 2009. Print.
Smith, Carol 2014. The Leadership Theory of Robert K. Greenleaf. Web.
Spears, Larry. “Character and Servant Leadership: Ten Characteristics of Effective, Caring Leaders.” The Journal of Virtues & Leadership 1.1 (2010): 25-30. Print.
Whitney, Rich 2015. Transforming the Social Change Model: Founding Principles Matter. Web.