Nowadays, one may notice that globalization is developing, and more people are moving around the world. Every day, many persons enter the territory of different countries, both for temporary residence and permanently, including the United States. It is worth noting that this poses a major security issue since one cannot guarantee whether an entering individual has good intentions. Thus, the visa officer is one of the main representatives of security in this aspect. The purpose of the work is to consider an example of a 0 visa case from a family of three people and the possible issues that an officer may encounter.
Thus, the case formulates a situation when a family of three people, namely a husband, wife, and child, want to apply to 0 visa settings to enter the United States. The family is originally from Colombia, and the husband is a businessman with a high income and developed relationships with business partners in the United States. They are applying for a 0 visa because they need to conclude a large contract with partners from the USA, and they decided to come to the territory to combine it with a holiday. The husband claims to have achieved great success in the business, which relates to the publication of books and trade. Besides, the businessman claims that this visit will bring financial benefits not only to the country of origin but also to the United States by concluding a large contract and paying taxes.
In such situations, a number of issues may arise for the officer. Firstly, the businessman, although presenting a number of documents that confirm the outstanding merits in the direction, they are controversial. According to the rules, one must submit at least three documents proving achievements at the national or international level (Tilbe & Heikkilä, 2021). However, the papers presented by the businessman were awarded by the local literary community. Thus, the main problem is to decide whether these documents are the basis for issuing a 0 visa. If the decision is wrong, there can be scandalous consequences, so it is necessary to find accurate information.
Further, the businessman produced documentation according to which one spoke at the panel and was a judge on the work of other publishers. The main issue here is to decide whether it indicates that a 0 visa should be issued. It is necessary to find additional information about the institution where the documentation was issued and about the scale of the performance. The additional difficulty is the time factor, as clients expect fast and correct outcomes. Finally, the officer needs to collect all the data and analyze the degree of their rationality and how proper it fits under 0 visa settings. The main difficulty is to analyze how outstanding the merits of the client were and how useful they were to both countries.
To conclude, the abovementioned US immigration case study shows how complex situations can be. This is mainly formulated by the correct choice of the criterion for evaluating the submitted documentation. In addition, it is necessary to collect data and analyze information for its authenticity. Thus, it also formulates a security aspect, which in some cases is a key one. The difficulties of this case lie in the selection of a criterion for assessing the scale of the merits of a businessman. In addition, it may be problematic to verify the authenticity of documents. To do this, the case will be submitted to two attorneys for further verification since additional information is needed for this case.
Reference
Tilbe, F., & Heikkilä, E. (2021). Work and migration: Case studies from around the world. Transnational Press London.