Rationalizing Equality in the USA Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

Introduction

The United States Constitution is one of the revolutionary systems of governance that exist in the contemporary world. The primary purpose of the document was to establish societal efficiency that had declined over the years due to slavery, blatant discrimination, and political instability among other letdowns of the ancient governments. Indeed, the document has significantly shaped the social, political, and economic landscapes of the present-day United States.

Nonetheless, the acceptance of the document passed through rigorous debates that slowed down the ratification process. The enactment of the Articles of Confederation took place in the early 1780s in an attempt to create a democratic system of governance for the United States. However, the ratification of the United States Constitution severally failed to materialize as per the expectations due to the existence of independent states that exercised sovereign powers over their jurisdictions.

Consequently, the idea of exercising federalism over the state power raised a plethora of questions amongst the supporters and opponents of the constitution. The effects of power abuse still in the minds of the federalists and the antifederalists, both groups had a hard time to come into terms with the intended ratification and implementation of the United States Constitution. This essay seeks to provide a clear explanation of why I would have backed the implementation of the ‘Plan of the New Federal Government’ in a bid to rationalize equality amongst the United States of America.

Why I Accept the United States Constitution

Multifarious drawbacks that featured in the Articles of the Confederation led to interstate conflicts (Ginsberg et al. 203). According to the authors, each American State had only a single chance of voting in the Congress in spite of its demographic and political representation in the central administration. This situation was a major drawback that demanded for deliberation on the number of votes that were to be possessed by each of the American States.

Ideally, this particular clause was impracticable since the American States differed in terms of both geographic and demographic sizes (Ginsberg et al. 209). This representation of the states created an unfair means of resource allocation that disadvantaged large states such as Virginia, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, and North Carolina among others. Astoundingly, the members of the smaller states also opposed the implementation of the Articles of Confederation in response to this weakness. These situations led to the emergence of federalist and antifederalist groups who triggered interstate conflicts.

However, Section 8 of Article 1 of the new United States Constitution addresses the aforementioned issue through the legislative branch of the federal government. Taylor reveals that the Article provides all eligible citizens with the right to vote for the Congress in their respective states by means of the ballot (357). For this reason, the new United States Constitution defends the representation of the citizens of all the 13 American States in the central administration. In my opinion, the Articles of Confederation should have represented all the states in ratios that would have created equality amongst them. Consequently, there was a need to accept the implementation of the ‘Plan of the New Federal Government’.

Secondly, the Articles of Confederation allowed the states to establish independent monetary systems. Each autonomous state used its currency as a representation of sovereignty. This situation weakened the economy owing to hindrance of trade amongst the sovereign states (Renz 81). Some of the states such as New York and Virginia did not only have unwelcoming exchange rates but also imposed inexorable duties on imported goods that passed through their ports to other states.

These monetary defects significantly hindered democracy amongst the states. Additionally, the formation of sovereign states affected their engagement with Britain. As a result, British ports withdrew the handling of imported goods for the self-governing states. However, Article 1 Section 8 of the new United States Constitution has corrected the abovementioned defects. The federal government bears all the powers to make judgments on monetary aspects such as taxes, duties, excises, and regulation of exchange rates not only amongst the United American States but also globally.

In support of the new United States Constitution, Section 8 of Article 1 sought to promote the welfare of all the 13 states of America with respect to all matters that pertain to currency (Taylor 357). The unification of the currency system and enactment of associated rules and regulations has played a crucial role to uplift the economic status of the United States of America.

Furthermore, the governance that functioned under the Articles of Confederation weakened the Congress. The Congress was deprived of its powers to control matters that pertained to tax, foreign regulation, and interstate commerce. According to Bowers, this situation led to insubstantiality of the central administration since the sovereign states had superior powers to control activities within their jurisdictions (99).

As a result, the states failed to operate efficiently due unequal distribution of power amongst the states. Additionally, limitation of power to the Congress had a significant influence on interstate commerce. Taylor posits that some of the states misused their supremacy over the central government to exercise their will on matters that pertained to commerce (357).The neighboring states were treated as foreign nations. As a result, neighbor nations encountered inequitable taxations, expensive license requirements, and unrelenting port protocols among other interstate conflicts (Bowers 112).

In my opinion, these situations created a trade war amongst the competing states because the congress lacked powers to exercise direct control over individuals or the states. Consequently, there was a need for amendment of the Articles of Confederation to reinforce the tax, foreign regulation, and interstate commerce clauses that had led to abuse of state power. Under the new United States Constitution, Section 8 of Article 1 clearly outlines the laws that govern today’s amalgamation of interstate commerce across all the 13 states of America.

Conclusion

This essay has presented the problems of the Articles of Confederation that paved way for abuse of state power. As evidenced in the above discussion, the Federalists eventually accomplished their principal goal of implementing the new United States Constitution to unify the 13 states of America. Amidst the refusal of the document by the antifederalists, ratification and institution of the document in the United States of America played a crucial role of establishing a powerful central government that extended its mandate to the Legislative, the Judicial, and the Executive arms of government.

For my part, I would have strongly supported the passage of the United States Constitution owing to the benefits that it had over the ancient Articles of Confederation. Thus, ratification and implementation of the ‘Plan of the New Federal Government’ account for the unification of today’s interstate commerce, tax control, and regulation of the US Dollar among other achievements that have shaped the social, political, religious, and economic landscapes of the United States of America.

Works Cited

Bowers, Michael. The Sagebrush State: Nevada’s History, Government, and Politics. Nevada, United States: University of Nevada Press, 2013. Print.

Ginsberg, Benjamin, Theodore Lowi, Margaret Weir, Caroline Tolbert, and Robert Spitzer. We the People: An Introduction to American Politics. United States: W. W. Norton & Company, 2012. Print.

Renz, Jeffrey. “What Spending Clause? (or the President’s Paramour): 1 An Examination Of The Views Of Hamilton, Madison, and Story on Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 of the United States Constitution.” The John Marshall Law Review 33.1(1999): 81. Print.

Taylor, Paul. “The Federalist Papers, the Commerce Clause, and Federal Tort Reform.” University Law Review 45.1(2012): 357. Print.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2020, June 14). Rationalizing Equality in the USA. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-articles-of-confederation-problems/

Work Cited

"Rationalizing Equality in the USA." IvyPanda, 14 June 2020, ivypanda.com/essays/the-articles-of-confederation-problems/.

References

IvyPanda. (2020) 'Rationalizing Equality in the USA'. 14 June.

References

IvyPanda. 2020. "Rationalizing Equality in the USA." June 14, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-articles-of-confederation-problems/.

1. IvyPanda. "Rationalizing Equality in the USA." June 14, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-articles-of-confederation-problems/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Rationalizing Equality in the USA." June 14, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-articles-of-confederation-problems/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
Privacy Settings

IvyPanda uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance your experience, enabling functionalities such as:

  • Basic site functions
  • Ensuring secure, safe transactions
  • Secure account login
  • Remembering account, browser, and regional preferences
  • Remembering privacy and security settings
  • Analyzing site traffic and usage
  • Personalized search, content, and recommendations
  • Displaying relevant, targeted ads on and off IvyPanda

Please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy for detailed information.

Required Cookies & Technologies
Always active

Certain technologies we use are essential for critical functions such as security and site integrity, account authentication, security and privacy preferences, internal site usage and maintenance data, and ensuring the site operates correctly for browsing and transactions.

Site Customization

Cookies and similar technologies are used to enhance your experience by:

  • Remembering general and regional preferences
  • Personalizing content, search, recommendations, and offers

Some functions, such as personalized recommendations, account preferences, or localization, may not work correctly without these technologies. For more details, please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy.

Personalized Advertising

To enable personalized advertising (such as interest-based ads), we may share your data with our marketing and advertising partners using cookies and other technologies. These partners may have their own information collected about you. Turning off the personalized advertising setting won't stop you from seeing IvyPanda ads, but it may make the ads you see less relevant or more repetitive.

Personalized advertising may be considered a "sale" or "sharing" of the information under California and other state privacy laws, and you may have the right to opt out. Turning off personalized advertising allows you to exercise your right to opt out. Learn more in IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy.

1 / 1