Introduction
Chapter 6 of “Society and Technological Change” utilizes phrases and words that show the author is doing more than reporting facts on technology and the environment. An example is in the second paragraph, where the author argues that technological advancement has two major negative effects: “pollution and depletion” (Volti, 2017, p. 177).
Discussion
Volti (2017) tries to not only give data regarding technological change but also highlights that unchecked innovation can have negative consequences like the addition of harmful substances in the environment and exhaustion of resources. Another instance is when the writer states that many new technologies can be used to substitute to “counteract existing hazards” (Volti, 2017, p. 206). Essentially, Volti meant that technology is not all bad and can be utilized to overcome some challenges. Finally, in the last part, Volti points out that there is an ultimate determinant of the ability to preserve the environment that has sustained humans through “centuries of carelessness, neglect, and exploitation” (p. 209). Generally, this emphasizes the significance of studying technology for its own sake and what it can teach people about the kind of societies they create for themselves.
A recent article that addresses an issue about technology and the environment is “Every Dollar Spent on This Climate Technology Is a Waste,” published by the New York Times. According to the authors, societal changes have been sparked by art and how technology has changed human life (Harvey & House, 2022). However, they question if this will be able to affect the necessary reforms to address the climate catastrophe. The main point they raise is how legislation like The Inflation Reduction Act has helped fight climate change but has also been counterproductive and a waste of public funds. Generally, the money was invested in renewable energy instead of carbon sequestration as planned.
Conclusion
The article is credible based on various reasons that readers can point out. First, it is recent and was just published on August 6, 2022. Essentially, this means that the information is not outdated and can be applied in the contemporary world. Second, sufficient data on the issue supports the author’s judgment. For instance, Harvey and House (2022) state that more than 90% of the 12 commercial C.C.S. projects in 2021 used improved oil recovery. Finally, the article is reputable because there is wide use of external sources that the authors prompt the audiences to click and get additional information.
References
Harvey, C., & House, K. (2022). Every dollar spent on this climate technology is a waste. The New York Times. Web.
Volti, R. (2017). Society and technological change (8th ed.). Worth Publishers.