Immunization is the most effective technology to avoid mass diseases and epidemics. Modern science proves that vaccination is safe and is one of the most outstanding public health achievements of the 21st century. However, the unknown always causes panic and fear of adverse reactions or complications. It is especially noteworthy in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic that is rapidly sweeping the world. Despite incontrovertible evidence that vaccination preserves numerous lives, the number of anti-vaccines is high. Nowadays, social media significantly influences people’s attitudes toward any topic. This fact has led to the desire to examine the role of social media in spreading the misinformation that has led to indecision regarding vaccines and how this relates to the immune system. A fair amount of research confirms the role of media influence on consciousness, but which sources shape opinion and which factors cause trust among citizens remain unexplored.
Therefore, the central research question is which social networks influence the formation of misbeliefs and what makes publications valid in individuals’ eyes and to what extent. Misinformation about vaccines may be contracting, economic, and political. The research will uncover the reasons for high trust in social media. Comprehending the roots of the topic will solve the problem of distrust of scientific evidence and contribute to debunking myths and a rational understanding of the need for vaccination. Educating the public about the pros and cons of vaccination is necessary, which should help immunize them against fears about vaccine safety and unfounded rumors and prevent them from spreading.
The research question will be answered after applying the qualitative data analysis method. Firstly, relevant information on the topic will be gathered, and surveys, questionnaires, people’s opinions about vaccines, and the sources on which they base their opinions will be studied and compared. The data analysis and comparison will make it possible to determine which social networks have the most crucial role in shaping opinions about vaccinations and the reasons for that. The primary sources of the study will be scientific articles published not later than three years ago. Furthermore, the information will be collected through the analysis of questionnaires and citizen surveys. The development strategy for immunoprophylaxis for 2-35 years can likewise be a reliable source. A summary of data from the above sources will contribute to a competent answer to the research question and the ability to form conclusions and recommendations.