Supreme Court has some operational norms, which makes it more accountable. Besides, the functional criteria significantly impact the cohesiveness and performance of various judicial teams. These norms exclude the judicial branch not to exerting more power where it is not necessary.
One of the strictest norms is the prohibition of cameras in the courtroom. The federal authorized the ban on cameras in the courtroom until the statutes otherwise (Bernzen, 2018). The court is restricted from allowing permission to take photographs during judicial proceedings. The rule was also enlarged, and the television cameras were included where the courts began to release audio of the oral arguments after the ruling was concluded. The implementation of cameras may make the Supreme Court more reliable even though they are challenging the court ruling.
Placing cameras in the courtroom has raised a lot of discussion and arguments as the broadcasters try to ask for permission to take and record judicial proceedings. Historically, in the case of the son who was kidnapped and murdered, the courts found it challenging to grant them the power of shooting (Bernzen, 2018). The broadcasters used traditional cameras, and the photographer presented depraved behavior by shooting the witness and blinding him with the flash bulb. The blinding denied the fair trial, which was introduced, leading to the rejection of the allegation by the courtroom.
In conclusion, I would suggest that the implementation of cameras in the courtroom will be essential. Since we are in a developing world and due to technology, camera quality has been upgraded; therefore, they will not blind the witnesses when shooting. Having cameras in the courtroom will enable and educate the public on how justice is carried out. In the upgraded century, we are in most of the things happening all over the global nation are broadcasted. By allowing the recording and releasing of judicial proceedings, the public right to have information will be guaranteed. Through watching, which most people rely on, judges will be more likely attentive to the facts of the cases they execute.
Reference
Bernzen, A. K. (2018). The court and the camera: Should privacy be a concern in court reporting?Journal of Media Law, 10(1), 37-48. Web.