The struggle for civil governance has been the most challenging aspect in several governments across the globe with the urge for better governance becoming a hotly contested subject internationally. Indeed, political leaders have always been questioned about their leadership nature as human beings have gradually become more politically informed than in the earlier days.
We will write a custom Essay on Thoreau and his idea of civil disobedience specifically for you
807 certified writers online
Democracy in civil governance has been arguably the most anticipated issue in the contemporary world with few leaders managing to employ democratic philosophies in their leadership. Perchance, the most tantalizing thought is Thoreau’s idea of “civil disobedience.” I do not like the idea of civil disobedience.
Civil or national disobedience can simply refer to the contravention of certain regulations, laws/orders, or even government commands that are responsible for governing a given nation. Thoreau’s idea of resistance to civil governance resulted from slavery predicaments that existed in England during the 1800 century.
The principle argument of Thoreau is that civilians should not consent governments to overrule their sense of right and wrong or simply ideologies. According to Thoreau, governments seem more corrupted than people can imagine, and thus inhabitants should not allow the government to take precedence over their principles since they use governance to manipulate civilians. Therefore, individuals have civil liberties to protect their individual dignity central to law and governance.
Having a deeper insight into the arguments brought out by Thoreau, the common sense behind leadership and national governance is to have a single voice that leads a multitude of civilians. Truly, the contemporary world has regularly faced leadership crises with cases of civil wars and human suffering becoming largely eminent.
However, the overriding reason is; should civilians follow Thoreau’s opinion of resistance to civil governance and contravene important laws? Sensibly, I disagree. The question is how can one manage to disregard laws and what is the importance after all? Thoreaubrings a commonsensical idea, but the nature of the reality behind it remains a controversy as most civilians who tried to attempt its application languish in dungeons for claiming their sovereignty.
The government is normally the most superior commander, and the notion behind confrontation of civil governance does not seem appealing to true nationalists and patriots who should base their defense against governance manipulation through more decent approaches. Every government across the world has its own rules and regulations that allow smooth civil governance.
A true nationalist or compatriot must believe in democratic national governance and must remain loyal and respect the rules and regulations governing a nation. Perhaps two important things that one must reason through are that laws govern multitudes of people who might have different opinions on prevailing governance. Secondly, it is much easier to subjugate an individual authoritarian leader through democracy than living in a nation without policies.
Conclusively, following the resistance to civil governance, the idea by Thoreau amounts to riding in darkness. Despite the fact that having loyal and trustworthy leaders who play no impunity in the entire globe is a mere dream, respect to laws and regulation means true patriotism. As the advocacy to have pure leaders remains a sticky conception amongst us, it is normally important to understand than headship crisis remains a human nature and errors do not mean total failure.
Laws abide nationhood among individuals and empower people to struggle to do the right. Laws are what makes a nation remain united and are definite weapons to criminals. From my opinion, following Thoreau’s idea may spoil civil governance beyond plastic repair.