Transfer Pricing and Corporate Taxation Research Paper

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

Projections

Consider a scenario where a company is based in the US and it manufactures and sells cars. It has two fully owned subsidiaries that are based in Cayman Island and Japan. The corporation tax rate in the US is 35%, 0% in Cayman Island, and 38.01% in Japan. The table presented below shows the projections of revenue, costs, profits, and taxes for the company and subsidiaries for these three regions.

Host country (Japan)Host country (Cayman Island)Home country
USA
Total
Sales$30,000 * 2006,000,000$20,000 * 1002,000,000$40,000 * 30012,000,00020,000,000
Costs$20,000 * 2004,000,000$8,000 * 100800,000$30,000*2006,000,00010,800,000
$20,000*1002,000,0002,000,000
Profit before tax2,000,0001,200,0004,000,0007,200,000
Tax rate38.01%0%35%
Tax paid760,20001,400,0002,160,200
Profit after tax1,239,8001,200,0002,600,0005,039,800

In these projections, Japan incurs a total cost of $20,000 to manufacture a single unit of a car. Japan then sells each unit to the plant in the US at $30,000. The total units manufactured in Japan are 200. Therefore, the plant in Japan makes a profit of $10,000 per unit. The plant in Cayman Island manufactures a unit of a car at $8,000. The plant sells a unit at $20,000 to the US plant. Therefore, the profit generated by the plant is $12,000 per unit.

The United States plant buys these units of cars from the fully owned subsidiaries and carries out painting and inspection on them. The cars are sold in the US at $40,000 per unit. Therefore, the profit made by the US plant is $4,000,000. The total profit before tax for these three plants is $7,200,000. The total tax paid is $2,160,000 while the profit after tax is $2,160,000.

Lowest possible overall tax

First scenario

Host country (Japan)Host country (Cayman Island)Home country
USA
Total
Sales$30,000 * 1504,500,000$30,000 * 1504,500,000$40,000 * 30012,000,00021,000,000
Costs$20,000 * 1503,000,000$8,000 * 1501,200,000$30,000*1504,500,0008,700,000
$20,000*1504,500,0004,500,000
Profit before tax1,500,0003,300,0003,000,0007,800,000
Tax rate000
Tax paid570,15001,050,0001,620,150
Profit after tax929,8503,300,0001,950,0006,179,850

In this scenario, the number of cars produced in Japan will be reduced from 200 to 150 while the quantity produced in Cayman Island will be increased to 150. Further, the transfer price per car in Cayman Island will be increased from $20,000 to $30,000. This scenario will result in lower taxes for each country.

Second scenario

Host country (Japan)Host country (Cayman Island)Home country
USA
Total
Sales$30,000 * 1003,000,000$30,000 * 2006,000,000$40,000 * 30012,000,00021,000,000
Costs$20,000 * 1002,000,000$8,000 * 2001,600,000$30,000*2003,000,0006,600,000
$30,000*1006,000,0006,000,000
Profit before tax1,000,0004,400,0003,000,0008,400,000
Tax rate38.01%0%35%
Tax paid380,10001,050,0001,430,100
Profit after tax619,9004,400,0001,950,0006,969,900

In this scenario, the quantity of cars produced in Japan will be reduced from 200 to 100 while the quantity produced in Cayman Island will be increased to 200. Further, the transfer price per car in Cayman Island will be increased from $20,000 to $30,000. This scenario will result in lower taxes for each country.

Scenarios that will result in favorable tax position

Scenario 1

Host country (Japan)Host country (Cayman Island)Home country
USA
Total
Sales$30,000 * 00$30,000 * 3009000000$40,000 * 3001200000021000000
Costs$20,000 * 00$8,000 * 3002400000$30,000*002400000
$30,000 * 30090000009000000
Profit before tax0660000030000009600000
Tax rate0.380100.35
Tax paid0010500001,050,000
Profit after tax0660000019500008550000

This scenario will result in a favorable tax position because the tax paid will reduce from $2,160,200 to $1,050,000. All the units of cars will be produced in the plant located on Cayman Island.

Scenario 2

Host country (Japan)Host country (Cayman Island)Home country
USA
Total
Sales$30,000 * 2006000000$40,000 * 1004000000$40,000 * 3001200000022000000
Costs$20,000 * 2004000000$8,000 * 100800000$30,000*200600000010800000
$40,000 * 10040000004000000
Profit before tax2000000320000020000007200000
Tax rate0.380100.35
Tax paid76020007000001,460,200
Profit after tax1239800320000013000005739800

This scenario will result in a favorable tax position because the tax paid will fall from $2,160,200 to $1,460,200. Production will take place in both in Japan plant and Cayman plant.

Scenario 3

Host country (Japan)Host country (Cayman Island)Home country
USA
Total
Sales$30,000 * 2006000000$50,000 * 1005000000$40,000 * 3001200000023000000
Costs$20,000 * 2004000000$8,000 * 100800000$30,000*200600000010800000
$50,000 * 10050000005000000
Profit before tax2000000420000010000007200000
Tax rate0.380100.35
Tax paid76020003500001110200
Profit after tax123980042000006500006089800

This scenario will result in a favorable tax position because the tax paid will reduce from $2,160,200 to $1,110,200. Therefore, the company will gain from this arrangement.

Scenarios that less likely result in an IRS audit

Scenario 1

Host country (Japan)Host country (Cayman Island)Home country
USA
Total
Sales$30,000 * 00$40,000 * 30012000000$40,000 * 3001200000024000000
Costs$20,000 * 00$8,000 * 3002400000$30,000*002400000
$40,000 * 3001200000012000000
Profit before tax0960000009600000
Tax rate0.380100.35
Tax paid0000
Profit after tax0960000009600000

In this scenario, there will be no production in the Japan plant. All production will take place in the plant located on Cayman Island. The company will also increase the transfer price for Cayman Island to $40,000 from $20,000. This scenario will attract an IRS audit because the tax for the whole company is zero. It is a scenario of tax avoidance.

Scenario 2

Host country (Japan)Host country (Cayman Island)Home country
USA
Total
Sales$30,000 * 00$60,000 * 30018000000$40,000 * 3001200000030000000
Costs$20,000 * 00$8,000 * 3002400000$30,000*002400000
$60,000 * 3001800000018000000
Profit before tax015600000-60000009600000
Tax rate0.380100.35
Tax paid00-2100000-2100000
Profit after tax015600000-390000011700000

In this case, all production will take place in the plant located on Cayman Island. Also, the transfer price within this Island will be increased from $20,000 to $60,000. This scenario will result in a negative tax of $2,100,000. This implies that the company will be seeking a repayment from the IRS and it will attract an audit.

Scenario 3

Host country (Japan)Host country (Cayman Island)Home country
USA
Total
Sales$20,000 * 1002,000,000$45,000 * 2009,000,000$40,000 * 30012,000,00022,000,000
Costs$20,000 * 1002,000,000$8,000 * 2001,600,000$20,000*2002,000,0006,600,000
$40,000 * 2009,000,0008,000,000
Profit before tax06,400,0001,000,0007,400,000
Tax rate38.01%0%35%
Tax paid00350,000350,000
Profit after tax06,400,000650,0007,050,000

In this scenario, the company will produce 100 units in Japan. The the transfer price for cars manufactured in the US will be the same as the price in Cayman Island. Thus, the company will be avoiding the tax in Japan. Further, 200 units will be produced in Cayman Island. Besides, the transfer price in Cayman Island will be $45,000. The overall tax paid by the company will be significantly low (Sheppard, 2010).

Audit Defense

The pricing and allocations of revenue used by the company are arrived at after taking into consideration a number of dynamics in the market. The first dynamic is the increased cost of operation. As can be seen in the documentations provided, the cost of production in the two plants has risen significantly. Therefore, the methods used by the company ensure that there are no losses (Stuart, 2009). There is adequate documentation to support the cost of operation and revenue earned by the company.

Besides, the company uses of accredited team of experts who carries out the allocation of the revenue and costs. Thus, they carry out their duties while taking into account the laws and regulations. Thirdly, Japan and Cayman Island have different tax laws and other regulations. Therefore, the allocations take into account the tax laws of the companies. Finally, the allocations are in line with the company’s goal of profit maximization (King, 2008).

Audit tools and plan

Audit review of transfer pricing by the IRS is a common practice. Thus, multinationals should put in place effective control and review them on a period basis to ensure that the company complies with the requirements of the IRS.

Tools

There are a number of tools that can be used by an IRS auditor to carry out the activities. The first tool is the International Returns (IR). The tool is used for appraising the tax returns for controlled entries. The second tool is Tax Information Gateway (TIG). The report is used to review financial data for companies across the world. The third tool is Capital IQ. It will be used to relate results to industry results. The final tool that can be used is Compustat. It aids in understanding the business of a company (Styron, 2007).

Audit plan

The audit plan will be made up of three phases. A summary of the plan is presented in the table below.

Phase of auditingActivitiesTime frame in month
Planning
  1. Pre-examination review
  2. Opening meeting
  3. Orientation of the taxpayer
  4. Construction of risk analysis
6
Implementation
  1. Gathering of information and evidence
  2. Development of the issue being audited
14
Resolution
  1. Presentation and determination of the issue
  2. Terminating the case
6

This strategy for conducting the audit is comprehensive because it takes into account all the basic stages of an audit, which are pre-audit, audit, and post audit. Besides, the time allocated is sufficient considering that the review will cut across various countries that have different laws (Gustafson, Peroni, & Pugh, 2011).

References

Gustafson, C., Peroni, R., & Pugh, R. (2011). Taxation of international transactions. St. Paul, MN: Thomson West Law Group.

King, E. (2008). Transfer pricing and corporate taxation: problems, practical implications and proposed solutions. USA: Springer Science & Business Media.

Sheppard, L. (2010). . Web.

Stuart, A. (2009). Transfer pricing: a world of pain. Web.

Styron, J. (2007). Transfer pricing and tax planning opportunities for U.S. corporations operating abroad. Web.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2022, April 9). Transfer Pricing and Corporate Taxation. https://ivypanda.com/essays/transfer-pricing-and-corporate-taxation/

Work Cited

"Transfer Pricing and Corporate Taxation." IvyPanda, 9 Apr. 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/transfer-pricing-and-corporate-taxation/.

References

IvyPanda. (2022) 'Transfer Pricing and Corporate Taxation'. 9 April.

References

IvyPanda. 2022. "Transfer Pricing and Corporate Taxation." April 9, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/transfer-pricing-and-corporate-taxation/.

1. IvyPanda. "Transfer Pricing and Corporate Taxation." April 9, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/transfer-pricing-and-corporate-taxation/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Transfer Pricing and Corporate Taxation." April 9, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/transfer-pricing-and-corporate-taxation/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
Privacy Settings

IvyPanda uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance your experience, enabling functionalities such as:

  • Basic site functions
  • Ensuring secure, safe transactions
  • Secure account login
  • Remembering account, browser, and regional preferences
  • Remembering privacy and security settings
  • Analyzing site traffic and usage
  • Personalized search, content, and recommendations
  • Displaying relevant, targeted ads on and off IvyPanda

Please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy for detailed information.

Required Cookies & Technologies
Always active

Certain technologies we use are essential for critical functions such as security and site integrity, account authentication, security and privacy preferences, internal site usage and maintenance data, and ensuring the site operates correctly for browsing and transactions.

Site Customization

Cookies and similar technologies are used to enhance your experience by:

  • Remembering general and regional preferences
  • Personalizing content, search, recommendations, and offers

Some functions, such as personalized recommendations, account preferences, or localization, may not work correctly without these technologies. For more details, please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy.

Personalized Advertising

To enable personalized advertising (such as interest-based ads), we may share your data with our marketing and advertising partners using cookies and other technologies. These partners may have their own information collected about you. Turning off the personalized advertising setting won't stop you from seeing IvyPanda ads, but it may make the ads you see less relevant or more repetitive.

Personalized advertising may be considered a "sale" or "sharing" of the information under California and other state privacy laws, and you may have the right to opt out. Turning off personalized advertising allows you to exercise your right to opt out. Learn more in IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy.

1 / 1