“Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection” is a peer-reviewed article published in New England Journal of Medicine. The paper was critically reviewed to make its publication in the mentioned journal possible. Therefore it presents common known information.
The article has a clearly stated problem and purpose. This clarity gives the reader an apparent picture and focuses on what the author is trying to achieve. According to Hooton (2012), urinary tract infection is a question that deserves medical attention today. The article presents a precise medical issue, which allows the author to be specific enough. In addition, the focus of the paper is quite narrow for the reader to follow and make an informed decision on the matter presented.
The article uses secondary data, which is why the author did not discuss data collection methods in the paper. The nature of the problem presented in the article provides a solution presented in the description and by synthesizing previous studies. The article makes use of different relevant in medical field printed materials to provide varied ways in which a medical practitioner can handle recurring urinary tract infection (UTI).
The information in the article is organised in a logical way making it easy for readers to follow. At the beginning of the paper, the author states the problem of the study that is a recurring UTI. Further, they give a preview of the different perceptions and assumptions underlying UTI (Hooton, 2012). This organisation makes it easy for the reader to develop certain curiosities, which encourages further reading.
As mentioned before, the paper contains secondary data. In the entire article, the author integrates relevant information from earlier studies to make it easy to read. Evidence-based practices are the new modes of operation in both medicine and health. For this reason, the information from other studies compiled in this article is quite relevant to finding a reasonable solution to the recurrence of UTI in women.
The article only presents the history of the medical condition and the issues underlying the urinary tract infections. For this reason, it does not provide the procedures used to achieve the results of the study because that information is not relevant in this case. However, the information provided makes it easy for any practitioner to choose the treatment suggested by the author in the recommendation part. The article presents all the upsides and downsides of various ways of handling UTI, thus making it easy to replicate the study (Hooton, 2012).
The author does not discuss the data collection method, on the contrary, he presents the results of other studies relevant to the problem. The purpose of the study was to provide the most effective solution to a recurring urinary tract infection (Hooton, 2012). For this reason, analyzing different ways of solving the matter was ideal for this research.
The interpretation of the results is agreeable because it allows the medical practitioners to reduce chances of UTI recurring in the future.
The entire article is quite informative to both the medical personnel and the public. The author provides different ways for the risk group to manage the situation at a personal level thus enhancing the health. The most interesting thing in the paper is how the researcher integrates information from various renowned studies. The major strength of the paper is in the way the author presents the information: simply, but yet covering all the relevant parts of a research. The major weakness of the paper is the author’s inability to offer new information. However, the paper is memorable as it presents a piece of significant medical information in a simple and precise way.
Reference
Hooton, T. (2012). Uncomplicated urinary tract infection. N Eng J Med, 366(11), 1028- 1039.