Introduction
Re-introduction of the Military Draft is one of the most controversial debates in America, because too many American citizens, mentioning of the Military Draft elicits in the painful memories of the Vietnam War that left America a devastated continent. Although this is the case, most of these individuals forget the current threats faced by the American continent, because of the increased cases of insecurity associated with terrorism.
It is important t note that, the well-being of any nation depends on its security because in any secure environment many developmental projects will thrive hence, promoting not only the economic status of a country but also the social and political institutions within a nation. Maintaining of peace and security is a function of all American law-enforcing agents, although it is necessary to note that, it is only the military that offers its service beyond national borders; hence, the importance of having enough military personnel.
Considering this, and the fact that most American security endeavors face many obstacles; a fact that is prevalent in the war in Iraq and Afghanistan, and many security threats from Somalia and Korea, there is need for the re-introduction of the Military Draft, because the present all-volunteer force method of military recruitment is likely to fail (Carter & Glastris, 2005, p.1).
Why Re-Introduce the Military Draft?
Presently, America uses the all-volunteer mechanism of recruiting military personnel, a practice that uses opposite policies to those of the Military Draft.
According to the Military Draft, all male-American citizens should be members of the selective service, a practice aimed at ensuring that America has enough men whom the government can use in case any security problem arises. It is important to note that, the last time the U.S. used the policy was during the Vietnam War; a war that left American a ravaged continent hence, the nature of opposition the concept of reintroducing the draft faces.
Although the draft faces much antagonism, considering the current and future demands of military demands, there is a need for the government to reconsider the option of reintroducing the Military Draft. Also, the fact that currently there are many changes in the American foreign policy, there is a need for the continent to prepare itself for any security needs that may arise, as technological and human inventions have changed terrorism and insecurity trends.
Yes, no one can deny that the all-volunteer method of recruiting military personnel is the best, however, in case security threats arise that will require more military personnel; can the available military personnel numbers support such needs? For America to retain its military prowess (which defines its position as a superpower), there is a need for change in military recruiting policies whereby, the only best option is to use the Military Draft (Carter & Glastris, 2005, p.1).
One main reason why most individuals oppose the Military Draft is the nature of costs associated with it. It is true that to sustain and maintain a conscript military, the government must increase its budgetary allocations to the defense department, something that may jeopardize developments in other development sectors. This was prevalent in early cases where the government applied the method, which had minimal achievements (Williams, 2006, p.1).
However, are the costs and dangers of insecurity comparable to dedicating more funds to the defense department? Weaknesses in a nation’s defense department can be very costly both socially and economically, as most crime cases cause extreme destruction of property, lives, and anarchy to a nation. Considering this, it is very advantageous for the government to allocate more funds to the defense department than face the pain associated with crime.
In addition to many, the introduction of the Military draft will mean that the government will force many young adults to participate in war, a fact taken by many as disrespect of human rights. This is one argument that is questionable on logical grounds, considering the fact that millions of Americans are always complaining of increased insecurity, a situation they are not ready to offer a solution to themselves.
For example, although terrorism is a global problem, one of the worst affected continents is the American continent; however, how many are ready to serve in the military as a mechanism offering aid to the current overstretched military? The answer is none, although these same individuals are the always cry foul whenever a security tragedy faces America.
To register in the selective service is a show of patriotism and readiness of the young and energetic population to protect their nation, whenever the need arises hence, not lack of respect to human rights, as many put it.
Yes, it is purely immoral for the government to force young Americans to go to war against their wishes; however, is it moral to place the entire burden of national security on a small volunteer military force? It is true joining the military is a personal choice; but, what if a security threat arises that needs services of more military security personnel, and nobody is ready to join the forces? In this like a case, with the Military Draft in place, such threats are easy to deal with; hence, the need for the re-introduction of the draft (Hotter, 2010, p.1).
Conclusion
In conclusion, considering the many benefits associated with the Military draft, for example, a meeting of America’s present and future security demand, it is necessary for the government to reintroduce the Military Draft, as a show of preparedness to protect the American citizenry. Also, it is important to note that, registering in the selective service is not a guarantee that individuals must go to war, but rather a deployment of individuals into war zones must follow specific protocols.
Reference List
Carter, P., & Glastris, P. (2005). The case for the draft. The Washington Monthly. Web.
Hotter, P. (2010). The case for reinstating the military draft in the USA. Helium. Web.
Williams, W. (2006). Reinstating the military draft. Capitalism Magazine, 3202. Web.