Introduction
Today’s feminist philosophy must be revolutionary praxis. It must be founded in the richness and promise of life, and it must take a holistic approach, looking at the bigger picture. Assume feminism is viewed as information comparable to ancestry, a suggestion to alter life from a broad viewpoint. In such a situation, it is possible to engage with academics, political debates, and personal and group battles of women to reform an unequal and unfair economic, social, and political structure. As a consequence, this feminist developmental theory, like the androcentric theories of dependency, modernization, and economic history, regarded caring work as a partnership with the private sphere that does not generate value and thus is further than the scope of progress.
Economic Development and Happiness
Gender concerns have gradually penetrated economics, both comprehensively and passionately, after a prolonged period of neglect. The current social-economic development appears to have substantially influenced and directed the development of new sub-disciplinary study topics (Kabeer, 2020). Early feminist economics might be seen as a legitimate reaction to the dominant dogma, with the goal of evaluating women’s roles in society and economic growth or addressing long-neglected gendered problems in order to shape a gender-aware government policy debate.
Conclusion
Males and females are regarded to be physiologically, mentally and emotionally, and ethnically distinct, so this assumption may result in the expectation that the two sexes will diverge in the way they view, emotionally react, and cognitively reference groups to outer circumstances, as well as socialize with other people, thereby trying to shape female trends of happiness. The primary connection of the aspect with this teaching experience is that teachers train women to conquer new heights in their careers and consider themselves in the discussion of economic events.
Reference
Kabeer, N. (2020). Women’s empowerment and economic development: a feminist critique of storytelling practices in “randomista” economics. Feminist Economics, 26(2), 1-26.