Introduction
The English language has gained a wide acceptance and is being used by many people across the world. This language is used as an official language in many countries. Globalization is said to be the major cause of English Internationalization. Many nations are currently under pressure to involve English in their communication. The non native speaking countries are also under pressure to learn the language in order to facilitate communication in the international world.
This paper summarizes the arguments provided in the article “An Essay on the Work of Composition,” which has been written by Min-Zhan Lu. The article is found in the journal titled “College composition and communication” that was published in the year 2004.
Argument Summary
As the language attracts considerable users across the world, there is a need to establish what is meant by being a responsive and a responsible user of English. There are assumptions, which have helped in the development of responsible and responsive approaches to the relationship between English users and the language itself.
The reason for summarizing this essay is to ensure that it is possible to reiterate the major points of the argument faster, at any time, and anywhere. In addition, it is important to incorporate summaries in any paper that has been written in order to communicate the main ideas of the work effectively.
Thesis
There has been a set of reasons as to why English users need to be responsive and responsible. Globalization has been mentioned to be among the drivers for the increased use of the language. In fact, the aspect of globalization can be argued to be the main reason for the spread of the English language. The aspect of globalization tends to bring countries together to interact through business transactions.
However, the use of the English language varies depending on the purpose and individual users. The author of the article presents assumptions, which are likely to develop considerable responsive and responsible approaches in the relation between English and its users. The main argument presented in the essay is that the assumptions developed by the author can help in the composition of the English language against the grain of all systems and relations of injustice.
Sub-arguments
In supporting her argument, the author says that people should be responsible especially in the catastrophe of the modern world. Being responsible will help people who are using the language. This is especially in selecting the best places where they can use the language, as well as how it should be used. People have to overcome the fears of communication breakdowns resulting from language imperfection. This will ensure responsibility and responsive communication is achieved.
If a language is not effective, then it can as well be termed as dead. The language effectiveness depends on its ability to pass on the required message at the right time. Language should not be biased for it to be effective. In this case, the non native speaking countries are making efforts to learn the language in order to communicate effectively using the language.
As the language continues to become international, it is being differentiated into various versions with varying accents and pronunciation depending on the country that is using the language. The pressure to learn the language will eventually submerge the other cultures in the process.
The use of English as a monopolistic language is likely to lead to capitalism, which is said to be in the interest of the US. An approach that is said to be behind this relationship of English and other languages is the commodity approach. Individuals learn the English version they need depending on the commodity they want.
There is a fear that the designers of tools for learning such a language are likely to suppress the efforts to acquire or learn the language. This becomes challenging since people do not understand how the English users establish the different ways to design standards of learning the language.
Users of the English language experience some level of dissonance in their discursive resources, and this has an influence on the English they are interested to learn. In fact, potential dissonance can assist an English writer in grasping the context of the language.
If efforts are made to make the redesigned language to an existence of collectiveness, this is likely to bring long term changes. Therefore, the composition need to be redesigned. In the long run, this will help in the composition of the English language irrespective of all the challenges.
Conclusion
The English language has become or is becoming an international language at a high rate. The language has gone on to include a number of versions, which are dependent on the country in which the language is being used. As a result, learners will learn the version they wish to know depending on their interests.
Different approaches define the relation between the English language and other languages. Nonetheless, there have been fears that the increased pressure to learn the US English is likely to result into capitalism. That is why the new approaches need to be embraced.