The first flight of the C-Series had been anticipated for a while. In actuality, Bombardier had not formally initiated the program for more than five years. In particular, the business had done so by announcing a letter of intent for the type from German flag carrier Lufthansa immediately before the 2008 Farnborough Airshow. However, there were significant setbacks throughout the development and subsequent manufacture of the first aircraft. Bombardier had planned to test-fly the type in the latter half of 2012, with the aircraft entering service the following year. In June 2012, the company reiterated this promise.
Additionally, due to supplier problems, the first flight had to be postponed until June 2013, and its launch was also delayed by a year. Although Bombardier showed off the prototype in March 2013 when it was nearly finished, the date of its first flight was repeatedly postponed. Transport Canada ultimately gave the go-ahead to start high-speed taxi and flight testing that August. There are different claims regarding the special day when Bombardier ceased using C-FBCS as a test plane. In any case, its flying lifespan was far shorter than an A220 used for commercial purposes. Given the above facts, Bombardier Aerospace should be more critical of the continuation of the C-Series
In this topic, three simple alternatives can be worked out to help the C-Series situation. The first approach is to create more stable models based on existing aircraft. This will help reduce development costs and ensure the design’s engineering reliability with already developed and operated solutions. The second approach is to find alternative ways to commercialize aircraft and find new contractors. Despite the international nature of the market, aircraft sales are usually fragmented and concentrated in simple sectors.
Extending the model line for specific needs can also be a third alternative. Professional sports, socially oriented, and civil service aircraft, taking into account the characteristics of customers, can be beneficial for production based on a more concentrated production cycle and potential payback.