Cite this

Comparing and contrasting social cognition models Essay


Social Cognition models play a big role in regulation of human behavior. They explain vital cognitions in a view of relating them to human behavior. There are two types of models which are commonly used in determining people’s behavior. Through observation and analysis a relationship between a person’s reaction to treatment and his healthy behavior can be drawn. The two cognition models include Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and Health Belief Behavior (HBM) models (Ajzen, 1988 and Rosenstock, 1966).

The HBM model is a key model used to determine certain actions of a person that they engage in with an aim of preventing health problems. (Rosenstock 1966; Becker 1974) For this reason, there are two types of human behavior observed and analyzed under this model. One of the behaviors is a person’s readiness to deal with the health problem when it pops up.

The second behavior is a person’s preventive mechanism towards health problems. Kasl and Cobb (1966) introduce illness behavior and sick -role behavior as examples of HBM. Illness behavior is described as including the behaviors of a sick person in seeking suitable remedy, whereas sickrole behavior is the activity that the person undergoes in receiving treatment.

It involves surrendering to a quailed medical practitioner. Severity of the illness and the illness itself acts as barriers to action perception (Rosenstock, 1974). However the benefit of a perceived action arises in cases where a person has laid down the funds ready to meet the costs of the illness he had perceived.(Nejad, Weirthheim and Greenhood, 2004).

According to Sheehan and Abraham, the modifying variables include costs and constraints of the illness. (Sheeran and Abraham, 1996). In switching variables the HBM model aims to determine why people engage in unhealthy activities despite their knowledge of the risks it can pose to them.

The difference between the HBM model and the TPB is that there is no specific mode of behavior determination. It is assumed that independent variables may cause prediction of certain human behaviors. This model has however been met with criticisms from other scholars (Norman and Conner 2006). Despite the criticisms it has been established that this method is effective in behavior analysis in different situations due to its flexibility (Barsen-Engquist and Parcel, 1992).

TPB model is an extension of the Theory of Reasoned Action (Fishbein & Ajzen, 1975). It majors in the following predictors of Human behavior: attitude change, Subjective norm and perceived behavioral control (Ajzen, 1985, 1988).

Attitude is defined as a person’s belief in relation to the outcome of the behavior in conjunction with that person’s belief for evaluation of the behavioral outcome. Subjective norm is defined as a person’s belief in others accompanied by an evaluation of whether she is motivated by the others action ( Cialdini, Kallgren and Reno 1991).

Perceived behavior control variable involves determining a person’s belief in control in whatever behavior he engages in. This variable is used to analyze whether a person’s belief in control either catalyses his engagement in the behavior or inhibits it. Despite its weaknesses of lack of health assessment as a threat, lack of sequence in events and timing coupled with the fact that it predicts intention only, TPB has been labeled a better predictor than other models

There are certain similarities between the two models from previous studies (Weinstein 1993, Garcia and Mann, 2003). One major similarity is that both the TPB and the HBM can predict positive behavior (Beck, 1981). Another similarity arises from the fact that apart from predicting positive health behaviors this two cognition models can be used to predict negative health behavior.

In conclusion, both the TPB and the HBM are relevant methods of predicting behaviors since research shows that they have been successful in the prediction of certain type of behaviors for instance predicting sexual behavior in students (Rutter, 1989), eating sugary foodstuff and smoking(Mullen, Hersey and Iverson, 1987). These two methods help a great deal in reduction of deaths caused by unhealthy behavior.

References

Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to action: A theory of planned behavior, Newyork: Springer.

Ajzen, I. (1988) Attitude Personality and Behavior, Chicago: Dorsey Press

Barsen- Engquist, K. & Parcel, G. S (1992) Attitude, norms and self efficacy: A model of adolescents HIV related risk sexual behavior Health Education Quaterly, 19,263-277

Beck, K.H. (1981) Driving while under the influence of Alcohol: relationship to attitudes, beliefs in college population, American journal of alcohol and drug abuse 18,377-388

Cialdini, R.B., Kallgren, C.A, & Reno, R. R. (1991) A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior, Advances in Experimental social Psychology 24, 201-234

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Garcia, K. & Mann, T. (2003) from ‘I wish” to ‘I will”: Social cognitive inhibitors of predictors of behavioral intentions. Journal of Health psychology, 8,347-360

Kasl, V. & Cobb, S. (1966).Health Psychology (pp. 329-339). New Delhi: Global Vision

Mullen, P.D. Hersey, J.C and Iverson, D.C. (1987) Health behavior models compared Social Science and Medicine 24, 973-981

Nejad, L.M. Weirthheim, E.H. & Greenwood, K. M (2004)Predicting dieting by using modifying and extending the Theory of planned behavior, Journal of planned Psychology 34, 2099-3431

Norman, P & Conner, M.E. (1996) The role of social cognition models in predicting health behaviors, Buckingham England: Open press University.

Rosenstock, I. M. (1966). “Why People Use Health Services.” Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 44:94–124

Rosenstock, I. M. (1974) Historical Origins of the Health Belief Model. Health Education Monographs. (2) 4

Rutter, D. R. (1989) Models of belief behavior relations in health. Health psychology Update, 8-10

Sheeran, P & Abraham, C. (1996) The Health Belief Model, Buckingham: Open Press University.

This Essay on Comparing and contrasting social cognition models was written and submitted by user LennyBalinger to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly.

LennyBalinger studied at Montana State University, USA, with average GPA 3.07 out of 4.0.

Need a custom Essay sample written from scratch by
professional specifically for you?

Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar

301 certified writers online

GET WRITING HELP

Cite This paper

Select a citation style:

Reference

LennyBalinger. (2019, January 7). Comparing and contrasting social cognition models [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://ivypanda.com/essays/comparing-and-contrasting-social-cognition-models/

Work Cited

LennyBalinger. "Comparing and contrasting social cognition models." IvyPanda, 7 Jan. 2019, ivypanda.com/essays/comparing-and-contrasting-social-cognition-models/.

1. LennyBalinger. "Comparing and contrasting social cognition models." IvyPanda (blog), January 7, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/comparing-and-contrasting-social-cognition-models/.


Bibliography


LennyBalinger. "Comparing and contrasting social cognition models." IvyPanda (blog), January 7, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/comparing-and-contrasting-social-cognition-models/.

References

LennyBalinger. 2019. "Comparing and contrasting social cognition models." IvyPanda (blog), January 7, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/comparing-and-contrasting-social-cognition-models/.

References

LennyBalinger. (2019) 'Comparing and contrasting social cognition models'. IvyPanda, 7 January.

More related papers