Introduction
The most common coding errors experienced by programmers include runtime and syntax errors, where the latter involves incorrect grammar in the computer language while the former is computer incompatibility. One of the policies and procedures that can enhance the detection and prevention of runtime errors is conducting multiple tests on the application using different computers. The testing will identify what computers prevent the code from running (Ibaraki et al., 2021). For syntax errors, the organization needs to implement the policy of computer language proofreading, where coders should reread the code to confirm no grammar mistakes are available to prevent its execution. Generally, proofreading computer language and conducting multiple tests are imperative policies that will detect and prevent the two errors and other coding mistakes.
Discussion
The two main challenges experienced while developing the compliance policy include finding comprehensive procedures for all coding errors and failure to achieve sustainability in the use of resources. In computer programming, numerous errors extend from runtime, logic, compilation, syntax, and others. Formulating a compliance policy that integrates all the coding errors is challenging, meaning one has to find procedures that work on about 98% of the mistakes. Besides, developing a compliance policy makes one ignore the importance of sustainability (Ibaraki et al., 2021). For instance, in the procedure mentioned above, the cost of power has been ignored by conducting multiple tests on different computers. The negligibility of such resources often leads to unsustainable use of essential assets.
Conclusion
Despite the challenges the compliance policy faced, the group gained some experience. Firstly, the group acknowledged that an efficient compliance program could help an organization detect and prevent rule violations, which ultimately offsets the possibility of being at crossroads with legislative bodies. Secondly, developing a compliance policy exposes one to problems that might result if not developed adequately (Ibaraki et al., 2021). For instance, if the compliance policy for coding errors fails to measure against common mistakes conducted by programmers, possible security breaches might be experienced by software end-users.
Reference
Ibaraki, S., Theissen, N. A., Archenti, A., & Alam, M. M. (2021). Evaluation of kinematic and compliance calibration of serial articulated industrial manipulators. International Journal of Automation Technology, 15(5), 567-580.