Concept Analysis of Loneliness, Depression, Self-esteem Research Paper

Abstract

The purpose of this direct study was to look at levels of depression, self-esteem, loneliness, and communal support, and the relationships stuck between these variables, in the middle of teenage mothers participating in the New Parents Project (formerly identified as the Young Parents Project). Therefore, the example consisted of 21 teenage mothers recruited from the three most important health care practices in dissimilar Midwestern cities. It was established that despair scores were in the high variety (CES-DC [greater than] 15) for 53% of the participants. Strong, important relationships were found, apart from between despair and self-esteem. The implications for the improvement of the New Parents Project, to improve meet the mental needs of adolescent mothers, are talking about.

Introduction

This research focused on the truth that the well-being of elder adults is universal, and their loneliness in exacting, are important themes in new deliberations in the Western earth. Furthermore, the social addition and contribution of older adults in civilization are seen as indicators of creative aging, and the mitigation of loneliness forms a fraction of policies aimed at achieving the objective of ‘successful’ aging. Discussions concerning loneliness day back to ancient times, when they were led by theorists (Peplau, L., & Perlman, D, 2002). They wrote first and foremost about ‘positive’ loneliness. Therefore, this optimistic type of loneliness – as indicated in the concept of ‘Einsamkeit’ used in German text until 1945 – is perceived to be connected to the unpaid withdrawal from the everyday hassles of life and leaning towards senior goals, such as mirror image, thought and message with God.

Loneliness is one of the nearly everyone all-encompassing person experiences, yet it is very difficult to describe. No doubt, Medora and Woodward (1986) distinct it as a reply to the absence of an adequate optimistic relationship to persons, places, or belongings (Peplau, L., Miceli, M., & Morasch, B, 2002). Peplau and Perlman (1982) referred to loneliness as the mental state those results from discrepancies flanked by one’s wish and one’s real relationships.

Definitions

According to Rook (1984), “loneliness is distinct as a lasting condition of emotional distress that arises at what time a person feels alienated from, misunderstood, or discarded by others and/or lacks appropriate communal partners for preferred activities, chiefly activities that provide an intelligence of social addition and opportunities for moving intimacy”.

According to the expert analysis, Peplau also authorized this mechanism as the cause of loneliness. The roots of this knowledge she has described as being “the consequence of early on life experiences in which isolation, indifference, and bareness were the code themes that characterized the child’s relations with others.”

Fromm-Reichmann has referred to ”real loneliness” as the condition of the brain “in which the information that there was populace in one’s history life is more or less beyond and the expectation that there may be interpersonal relations in one’s prospect life is out of the kingdom of hope or imagination.”

“Self-concept is the ability to be able to see ourselves “from the exterior”; the picture we increase of how others see us. This image affects the method in which we get care of ourselves bodily, expressively, and in the way we luxury others. People who contain a low self-concept might feel that they do not value others’ notice or care (Ouellet, R., & Joshi, P, 2000, 821-822). Moreover, the growth of self-concept does not forever depend on accurate evaluations. Even if we disgustingly misconstrue our self-image those misjudgments turn out to be part of our daily lives.”

“Webster defines self-worth as a conviction in oneself; self-respect. Self-worth is the mixture of self-assurance and self-respect. It is the confidence that you are commendable of living. Therefore, a person’s self-esteem fluctuates and is exaggerated by life’s experiences. Optimistic self-esteem is significant because when the populace experience it, they sense good, they are effectual and creative, and they react to people and themselves strongly and optimistically (Brennan, T., & Auslander, N, 2003). A being with unenthusiastic self-esteem tends to sense unloved, undeserving, and frequently experiences nervousness and despair.”

Concept of Loneliness

First, however, the obvious, workable meaning of loneliness is essential. In the numerous writings which I have researched for this document, there is not an obvious Definition. To come up with such a meaning von Witzleben illustrious two types of loneliness. One is caused by the defeat of a thing (being abandoned, deserted), while the additional is intrinsic, inborn in everybody – the feeling of life from unaccompanied and helpless in the earth.

Loneliness is sometimes old as a synonym of unaccompanied. However, a lot of authors who have on paper about loneliness concern that it not be puzzled with separation, solitude, aloneness, division, and estrangement (Mahon, N, 2002, 343-347). These writers especially care that loneliness is distinguished from aloneness. If a being feels being alone, he has reserved willingly. If he feels loneliness, he has withdrawn unwillingly and feels that he has been alienated and remote by forces that lie exterior himself.

When this loneliness becomes great, there is the feeling of no relationship, the emotion that there is no important human being in the world using whom one relates at all. Furthermore, whereas being alone may be positive, loneliness is usually unhelpful.

Clark wonderfully outlines in open detail what she considers to be an appropriate meaning for this concept of loneliness:

1. Man has required transcending his separateness.

2. This need produces nervousness.

3. Relief of tensions is required through self-transcendence by:

3.1 Direct means (association with others).

3.2 Indirect means (original expression).

4. If these means are winning, feelings of loneliness are relieved, at the smallest amount temporarily.

5. if these incomes are unsuccessful, barriers exist (Some of the fences to self-transcendence are self-alienation, disgrace and fault, social ostracism, cultural mobility and keeping out, lack of faith, and ache.)

6. If he is unable to conquer the barrier to self-transcendence, there is an add to in tensions which leads to:

6.1 An Increase in nervousness.

6.2 An add to the amount of loneliness.

7. The unrelenting unfulfilled require for self-transcendence leads to:

7.1 Further add to anxiety

7.2 A degree of loneliness experiences as supernatural pain.

8. Defenses (denial, repression, repression, alcoholism, somatic complaints, etc.) are used to

Decrease the nervousness and protector next to the pain.

9. Such defenses consequence in further estrangement from the self and others.

10. This estrangement leads to add to in loneliness and anxiety.

11. As loneliness and anxiety increase, military protection no longer works.

12. As the defenses disintegrate, the lonely being attempts to escape into earth of unreality (personality disintegration).

When this meaning is applied to the symbolic tree, it is willingly seen that as loneliness becomes more powerful and progresses up the tree from side to side the branches, leaves come into view which represents the extreme run away to unreality, resultant in the demonstration of hallucinations and delusions.

The interpersonal association theory and clothes of existentialism can too be practical to the symbolic tree, allowing for additional exploration and a deeper sympathetic of the ensuing phenomena of hallucinations and delusions (Olson, D., Larsen, A., & McCubbin, H, 2002).

Although more than a few writers consider that loneliness is a fundamental factor in cerebral illness, Sullivan is single of the few who has attempted to explore the developmental course of this phenomenon. Sullivan supposed that the components which end in the knowledge of loneliness begin in childhood and exist in every developmental era (Medora, N., & Woodward, J, 2004, 391-402). He referred to this mechanism as being connected to the need for tenderness in infants, the need for mobile play in children, the demand for compeers in the young area, and the need for a more close kind of association in preadolescence.

Attributes of this Research

Few adolescents flee the pain of loneliness. In information, many theorists and investigators propose that loneliness is widespread and particularly intense throughout adolescence. According to Woodward (1988), teenage years are regularly characterized by alienation, loneliness, loneliness, and suffering.

The importance of loneliness in the learning of affective disorders among young people cannot be overemphasized. It has been connected to drug mistreatment and alcoholism, adolescent criminal behavior, and suicide.

According to the expert analysis, Sullivan (1953) theorized that loneliness is an essential component of all psychopathology and that the move violently to find relief as of loneliness is a central inspiring factor in much of human performance. Fromm-Reichmann (1959) asserted that understanding loneliness will guide to a better understanding of the etiology of most cerebral illnesses.

An appraisal of the literature suggests that loneliness is connected with many variables. Beck (1967) reported that the approach of loneliness, sadness and indifference were considerably related to despair in the subjects he studied. Furthermore, the association stuck between loneliness and depression has been substantiated by young people and university scholars.

Several studies have recognized that loneliness is unenthusiastically connected to self-esteem in the middle of young people, and one recognized this association with college scholars. Lonely populace frequently senses worthless, useless, and unlovable (Moore, D., & Schultz, N, 2003, 95-100).

This research focused on the truth that the relationship stuck between loneliness and family strengths has not especially been examined amongst young people. Goswick and Jones (1981) reported that one changeable implicated in the knowledge of loneliness in the middle of school students, but not in the middle of high school subjects, was parental indifference. Brennan and Auslander (1979) recognized family; school, and gaze settings as the major variables linked with loneliness and interpersonal displeasure amongst young people.

If we analyzed then we come to know that the relationship stuck between loneliness and parent-adolescent message has not been substantiated (Mahon, N, 2003, 66-76). However, Mahon (1982) and Franzoi and Davis (1985) establish an inverse association between self-disclosure and loneliness in the middle of young people.

Several studies with teenager subjects have established a significant negative association stuck between age and loneliness. Brennan and Auslander (1979), though, reported no appreciable association stuck between the two variables.

According to the expert analysis, numerous investigators have examined loneliness and gender in the middle of adolescents. Females have reported considerably higher loneliness scores than males.

To date, merely a limited number of studies have empirically examined the natural world of loneliness in teenager populations; much of the obtainable data on loneliness concerns school students. Thus, their study was intended to extend this line of question to midwestern young people.

Purpose

If we analyzed then we come to know that the first objective was to examine the extent to which loneliness was knowledgeable by adolescent’s presence in public schools in four midwestern groups of people. A second objective was to investigate whether present was dissimilarity in loneliness scores for the example under investigation and those in preceding studies with a diversity of populations. The third object was to determine whether there was dissimilarity in loneliness scores stuck between male and feminine subjects (Faulstich, M., Carey, M., Ruggiero, L., Enyart, P., & Gresham, F, 2004). The final object was to methodically examine loneliness in family members to depression, self-esteem, relations strengths, parent-adolescent message, and period of the adolescents.

Hypotheses Tested

1. There is a significant dissimilarity in loneliness scores stuck between male and feminine young people.
2. Loneliness among midwestern young people is significantly connected to (a) depression, (b) self-esteem, (c) family strengths, (d) father-adolescent message, (e) mother-adolescent message, and (f) age.

Method

Sample

This research focused on the truth that the convenience example consisted of 156 adolescents present junior and senior far above the ground schools in four midwestern communities. The subjects built-in 62 males and 94 females stuck between the ages of 11 and 18; denote age was 14 (SD = 1.56). Most of the subjects were pallid, Protestant or Catholic, and lower-middle to center group.

Instruments

Loneliness Inventory. Woodward’s (2001) Loneliness Account (Short Form) is a 10-item record which measures loneliness under varied conditions and situation. Response alternatives are scored on a 5-point rating level, which ranges from approximately always to by no means. The superior the score on the Loneliness Inventory, the senior the adolescent’s appraisal of loneliness. The sum of the responses is alienated by the number of questions answered to decide the mean loneliness score. Convergent soundness of.97 was recognized by correlating the Loneliness Inventory with a self-rating gauge of loneliness. Good interior constancy was found, as evidence by a coefficient alpha of.96 through an example of 387 respondents ranging in age beginning 8 to 20 years. In the in attendance learn, the coefficient alpha was.74.

Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale for Children (CES-DC). The CES-DC is a 20-item survey suitable for studies of the epidemiology of depressive symptomatology in the universal inhabitants (Franzoi, S., & Davis, M, 2005, 768-780). Cognitive, emotional, behavioral, and somatic indications linked with depression are assessed by 16 items, and optimistic effect is assessed by 4 items. For every item, respondents point to the incidence or period with which they have knowledgeable a specific feature throughout the previous week on a balance from 0 to 3. Higher scores point to better symptomatology. Concurrent soundness of.44 (p |is less than~.005) was recognized by comparing scores on the Children’s Depression Inventory to CES-DC scores. A Cronbach’s alpha of.84 for the CES-DC was established for an example of 148 respondents ranging in age from 8 to 17 (Faulstich et al., 1986). An alpha coefficient of.88 was obtained in the there learn.

Rosenberg’s Self-Esteem Scale (RSE). Self-esteem was deliberate by Rosenberg’s (1965) Self-Esteem Scale. The RSE is a 10-item, 5-point score scale that measures young people’s approaches in the direction of the self. Positively and unenthusiastically worded items are built-in in the scale in arrange to reduce the option of a response set. When five items on this record are reverse scored, higher scores point to higher perceptions of self-esteem. A significant association of.60 was establish flanked by the RSE and Coopersmith’s Self-Esteem register. Test-retest dependability of the RSE over two weeks was.85 in the middle of adolescents. Rosenberg (1965) moreover reported a Guttman scale dependability coefficient of.92 amongst adolescents. The coefficient alpha was.85 in the there learning.

Family Strengths Inventory. The Family Strengths Inventory is a 12-item, summit score level which measures the degree to which families can manage the predictable troubles and conflicts that happen in family livelihood (Olson, Larsen, & McCubbin, 1982). The senior they achieve, the higher the obvious family strengths. Olson et al. (1982) reported that construct soundness was obtained from side to side issue analysis with varimax rotation (N = 2,740). The Cronbach’s alpha was.83, and the test-retest dependability coefficient was.58 in the middle of their sample of young people and youthful adults. In the in attendance learn, the coefficient alpha was.79.

Cases

Case: Mr. and Mrs. George

If we analyzed then we come to know that this couple has been seen in a Marriage and Family treatment Clinic for an era of twenty-one sessions. The wife had been experiencing delusions.

The therapists concerned were a male relations therapist and me. Before my flattering

involvement, one more female therapist and their male therapist had seen this pair for a total of ten sessions. The male psychoanalyst and I have seen this pair intended for eleven sessions.

Mrs. George has a conventional previous analysis which began several 15 years ago. The newest therapy occurred concerning two existence ago. This is the primary time to the companion has also conventional treatment (Gaev, D, 2001, 237-240). During the appearance of this container, it will become obvious that having the companion in therapy was the dangerous changeable that completes the important difference as to whether Mrs. George’s familiarity requirements would be met And because this requirement was met, Mrs. George no longer had the require to experience delusions.

At the first stage of the treatment in which I was concerned, both Mr. and Mrs. George was 53 years of period and had been wedded 31 years. They had three broods, two of whom had died from brawny dystrophy (Fromm-Reichmann, F, 2004). The one livelihood son was 20 years of period.

Mrs. George exhausted most of her near the beginning early existence in an orphanage and was later located in several promote homes. She repeatedly felt that she have to “prove” herself and that If she did not “behave properly” then she would be asked to go away. She finally was adopted by relations, but in a state that she performs correctly or she would be absent alone. She affirmed that she had felt discarded all of her existence and as a youngster, she did not have any shut relationships with the additional populace (Diamant, L., & Windholz, G, 2001). She has had a period of annoyance, despair, and unrestrained destructive tendencies, and spoken her approach of loneliness and her constant fear of life form lonely and life form left unaccompanied

Mrs. George’s delusions come into view to be pathological jealousy, throughout which she has comatose extramarital sexual impulses also heterosexual or homosexual, which are then predictable onto her companion and come into view clinically as delusions of unfaithfulness. It is significant to note that the cause for these impulses or needs was again the dictate to complete the need for familiarity. This familiarity need was not just a sexual one but quite a need for an emotional nearness with one more being.

Mr. George. was a passive-aggressive person who had extreme complexity in expressing his approach. He stated that he was forever taught as a youngster to control his approach and thus appeared very bland, unbending, and stone-faced as an adult. He withdrew and become dividing when Mrs. George was feeling upset.

He stated that he didn’t know how to react or what when Mrs. George became distressed. It Is very tongue in cheek that even as Mrs. George felt left out of Mr. George’s existence and his wellbeing, he lived vicariously from side to side Mrs. George’s many activities. He had a lot of feelings of shamefulness and insufficiency and had also knowledgeable loneliness but did not know how to set up close relations. The degree of Mr. George’s loneliness was not as extreme as his wife’s.

Thus, though Mrs. George came to the Clinic as the recognized enduring, it was obvious that the difficulty was an association in which neither companion nor companion was having his or her familiarity needs to be met. As a consequence, both were experiencing an approach of loneliness and shamefulness. Mrs. George’s loneliness manifested in additional abnormal performance than Mr. George’s but both persons played an important role in the estrangement to every felt.

• Step One – Establishing A Therapeutic Nurse-Patient Relationship

One of the most necessary needs in this association was to set up trust since the main anxiety was loneliness. A good-faith relationship by now existed with the male psychoanalyst and Mr. and Mrs. George when I entered the healing sessions as a co-therapist. However, it became essential for me to set up a close association with the wedded pair.

That a be short of trust exist, became obvious in my second sitting with Mr. and Mrs. George Mr. George. would not seem me in the eye at what time he spoke to me. I then realized that I have to interfere and remark on my surveillance to Mr. George. and explain the emotion I was experiencing as a consequence of his avoiding looking at me (von Witzleben, H.D, 2001, 37-43). This allowed Mr. George. to be acquainted with that I was paying attention to him as a being and wanted more significantly get in touch with him. After my interference, we both gave each additional direct eye to get in touch with when responding to every other. Hence as a consequence of that interference, an intelligence of trust urbanized.

• Step Two – The Therapist’s Acceptance of Her Own Feelings of Loneliness

My acceptance of my approach of loneliness was a very important stage of the

interference process. I had before learned the significance of this step when an enduring inquired if I was ever feeling alone since I was away from home. At that time, I was rather defensive at the suggestion that I might also be experiencing such feelings (Ferreira, A, 2001, 201-207). It helped me realize that next to period the ache of loneliness is simply too sore for people to state and consequently we construct defenses to protector against this revelation. However, the class I erudite optional that if therapists refute their approach of loneliness, then they might be not capable to believe the patient’s look of these feelings or may pay no attention to any nonverbal performance representative loneliness.

The receipt of my feelings of loneliness was therefore not a difficulty using the married pair in question since of my previous knowledge.

• Step Three – The Therapist’s Acceptance of Her Own Humanness

A receipt of one’s humankind overlaps with the previous step but is additional general. At this pace, I needed to be eager to accept my possess humanness. It was essential for me to have knowledgeable, recognized, and have a consciousness of the approach of fear, contentment, pain, loneliness, annoyance, and other important emotions (Clark. E, 2001, 33-50). To the amount that I was bright to do this, the climate of the therapy sessions was an unlocked, gullible one which allowable the patients to make known their genuine approach.

Procedure

The essential design of the study consisted of a cross-sectional example of the inhabitants using a written survey for data collection. A letter explaining the purpose of the study and parental and teenager consent forms were mailed to possible participants (Clark, E, 2003, p. 33). Instructions in particular that young people’s responses would be kept secret. Students were administered the survey at school. It consisted of the instruments and demographic items.

Pearson product-moment association coefficients and t-tests were old to examine the data. The.05 level of meaning was used for difficult hypotheses.

Results

The subjects attained a denote loneliness achieve of 2.59. Woodward and his connections reported that loneliness scores in their previous sixteen studies ranged from.78 to 2.99 (on a level from 0 to 4). For purposes of contrast, the adolescents in the in attendance learn were found to be the fourth loneliest collection; only urban older high school girls, rural Nebraska adolescents, and country gifted adolescents were establish to be lonelier.

The feminine adolescents’ mean loneliness achievement was 2.55 (SD =.57) and the males’ mean achievement was 2.64 (SD =.57). This dissimilarity was not important.

Of the independent variables examined, depression was the majority highly connected with loneliness (r =.646, p |is less than~.001). A statistically important relationship was establish stuck between loneliness and self-esteem (r = -.482, p |is less than~.001). Lower self-worth scores suggested better loneliness. Loneliness was unenthusiastically related to relations strengths (r = -.276, p |is less than~.001) and mother-adolescent message (r = -.252, p |is less than~.01). However, there was no important correlation stuck between loneliness and father-adolescent communication. The older young populace was lonelier (r =.227, p |is fewer than~.01) than younger young people.

Consequences

The findings presented are hesitant because a convenience example was utilized in this learning. They also are supposed to be interpreted carefully since the basic plan of the investigation consisted of a cross-sectional example of the inhabitants (Sullivan. H.S, 2002, p.132).

It was established that the midwestern adolescent respondents were feeling alone, as evidenced by mean loneliness achieve of 2.59. Researchers have exposed that adolescents are at senior risk of experiencing loneliness than a lot of other populations, counting the old.

The judgment that there was no major difference in the loneliness scores of a gentleman and female young people contrasted through those of Medora and Woodward (2002), and Woodward and Frank (2001), who reported that females were lonelier than males. extra studies should look at how loneliness is influenced by the sexual group in the middle of adolescents.

A major judgment was that loneliness was considerably related to teenager depression, as has been time after the time noted in previous investigations. The lonely populace often ports an approach of despair, sadness, and weariness.

In the present study, loneliness was inversely connected to self-esteem. This is in accord with the findings of Woodward and Frank (2002). According to Peplau (2001), low self-esteem is often entrenched in an interrelated set of self-defeating cognitions and behaviors that damage social competence and add to the danger of loneliness.

If we analyzed then we come to know that there was an important negative association between loneliness and relations strengths. Jones (2001) reported comparable findings in the middle of their example of college students.

In addition, loneliness was inversely connected to mother-adolescent communication. However, loneliness was not connected with father-adolescent communication (Crandell, R, 2004). Future studies are supposed to look at how loneliness is prejudiced by parent-adolescent messages to decide whether the present findings can be simulated.

Older young people were lonelier than younger young people. This judgment might be explained by the information that as young people become older, they might skill greater communal isolation.

Implications And Recommendations

According to the expert analysis, the findings suggest the need for appraisal and treatment of loneliness in the middle of young people. According to Beck, Rush, Shaw, and Emery (1979), cognitive treatment is an effective move toward treatment; adolescents can be confident to adopt dysfunctional beliefs and self-defeating consideration patterns. Interventions are supposed to also promote social hold up as well as feelings of self-confidence and capability in communal interaction and difficulty solving. Stokes (1985) contends that young people with a helpful system tend to be less lonely since such networks provide intelligence of a group of people and belonging. Counselors, educators, and health mind professionals should work together to plan programs on interpersonal difficulty solving and communal skills training to assist young people to learn how to get support from one more and relations members (Brennan, T, 2002).

Further, investigation is wanted with larger random samples of young people from varied backgrounds. Longitudinal studies are also warranted to decide whether the factors concerned in teenager loneliness alter over time.

Limitations

This research focused on the truth that the findings should be interpreted carefully because of the little sample size. Further, it was an expediency example, which prevents the answer from being generalized to the better population. In addition, the elevated CES-DC scores may point to selection bias. Because the investigators relied on self-report measures, diagnose of despair might not be confirmed.

Recommendations for Future Research

The additional investigation should be conducted with a better, random example of adolescents from a diversity of geographic locations and dissimilar socioeconomic, racial, and religious backgrounds. The emotional characteristics of young person mothers participating in the New Parents Project might be examined, using a longitudinal design, throughout the first year of fatherhood. In addition, the characteristics of teenager mothers who have a home right of entry to the New Parents Project could be compared with those of teenager mothers who do not.

Summary

This exacting case connecting the suggested treatment intervention was very winning and satisfying. It is very significant, however, that therapists understand that these seven steps were satisfactory in this exacting case, but steps four to seven may be customized using every pair.

However, the first three ladders are more than likely necessary to some effectual interference commerce with loneliness. Also, the excerpts as of this case occur to exemplify the tourist attractions that were connected to loneliness. The therapists documented to there were other issues and concerns that also wanted to be dealt with using and which were, but the dictate for familiarity seemed to contain top main concern.

Loneliness entrenched in the representative tree cannot be dealt with by nerve the leaves; it has to be dug out by the ancestry. Psychotherapy needs a treatment psychotherapist whose determination adds to this digging.

References

1. Fromm-Reichmann. F: loneliness Psychiatry 22: 7-15,2001.
2. Sullivan. H.S.: Conceptions of Modern Psychiatry, Washington. D.C.: Wm. A. White Foundation. 2002, p.132.
3. Clark, E.: “Aspects of Loneliness: Toward a Framework of Nursing Intervention.” In Developing Behavioral Concepts in Nursing. Georgia: Southern Regional Education Board. 2003, p. 33.
4. Peplau, H.: Loneliness. American Journal of Nursing,LV, No 12 (1955). 1476
5. Clark. E.: Aspects of Loneliness: Toward a Framework of Nursing intervention in Developing Behavioral Concepts in Nursing. Georgia: Southern Regional Education Board. 2001, 33-50.
6. Ferreira, A,: Loneliness and Psychopathology. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, XXII, No. 2 (2001), 201-207.
7. Fromm-Reichmann, F.: Loneliness. Psychiatry (2003) 22: l-15.
8. von Witzleben, H.D.: On Loneliness. Psychiatry, XXI, No 1 (2001), 37-43.
9. Brennan, T. (2002). Loneliness at adolescence. In L. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 269-290). New York: John Wiley.
10. Brennan, T., & Auslander, N. (2003). Adolescent loneliness: An exploratory study of social and psychological predispositions and theory (Vol. 1). Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Mental Health, Juvenile Problems Division.
11. Crandell, R. (2004). The measurement of self-esteem and related constructs. In J.P. Robinson & P. Shaver (Eds.), Measures of social psychological attitudes (pp. 45-162). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.
12. Diamant, L., & Windholz, G. (2001). Loneliness in college students: Some therapeutic considerations. Journal of College Student Personnel, 22, 515-522.
13. Faulstich, M., Carey, M., Ruggiero, L., Enyart, P., & Gresham, F. (2004). Assessment of depression in childhood and adolescence: An evaluation of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for Children (CES-DC). American Journal of Psychiatry, 143, 1024-1027.
14. Franzoi, S., & Davis, M. (2005). Adolescent self-disclosure and loneliness: Private self-consciousness and parental influences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 768-780.
15. Fromm-Reichmann, F. (2004). Loneliness. Psychiatry, 22, 1-15.
16. Gaev, D. (2001). The psychology of loneliness. Chicago, IL: Adams Press.
17. Goswick, R., & Jones, W. (2002). Loneliness, self-concept, and adjustment. Journal of Psychology, 107, 237-240.
18. Mahon, N. (2002). The relationship of self-disclosure, interpersonal dependency, and life changes to loneliness in young adults. Nursing Research, 31, 343-347.
19. Mahon, N. (2003). Developmental changes and loneliness during adolescence. Topics in Clinical Nursing, 5, 66-76.
20. Medora, N., & Woodward, J. (2004). Loneliness among adolescent college students at a midwestern university. Adolescence, 21, 391-402.
21. Moore, D., & Schultz, N. (2003). Loneliness at adolescence: Correlates, attributions, and coping. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 12, 95-100.
22. Olson, D., Larsen, A., & McCubbin, H. (2002). Family strengths. In D. Olson, H. McCubbin, H. Barnes, A. Larsen, M. Muxen, & M. Wilson (Eds.), Family inventories (pp. 78-92). St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota.
23. Ouellet, R., & Joshi, P. (2000). Loneliness in relation to depression and self-esteem. Psychological Reports, 58, 821-822.
24. Peplau, L., Miceli, M., & Morasch, B. (2002). Loneliness and self-evaluation. In L. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research, and therapy (pp. 135-151). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
25. Peplau, L., & Perlman, D. (2002). Perspectives on loneliness. In L. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research, and therapy (pp. 1-20). New York: John Wiley & Sons.