Introduction
Globalized and local entities have held the concepts of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in order to achieve varied business objectives that match the current dynamic markets. This paper focuses on the different strategies used by organizations that chose to work with local communities, and their effectiveness in conducting themselves as corporate and global entities.
According to IISD (2011), CSR is the internal enactment of regulating policies, which ensures that the involved organization conforms to the legal, social, environmental, and ethical concerns of the society. Numerous organizations have realized the importance of practicing CSR in enhancing their market share and the overall public perception.
CSR involves the utilization of set standards within the company to ensure that the company acts responsibly and meets the aforementioned requirements.
Quality is one of the ways through which an organization can express its commitments to CSR (Calabrese 2004). It means that the involved organization care for its clients hence endeavours to serve them with the best. CSR is an in-built drive governed and steered with appropriate policies through viable business models.
Focusing on the different strategies used by organizations working with local communities, and their effectiveness to conduct themselves as corporate and global citizens
Viable CSR starts with mutual cooperation with communities to enhance equality, impartiality, and nurturing of the unique potentials presented by different individuals. Creating regulations that enhance adherence to ethical and human rights concerns is critical within organizations. CSR endures to achieve both internal and external compliances to the moral demands of the society.
This is achievable through stringent observation of the self-regulative policies and ratification of competitive business models within the organization. CSR strives to capture the community with ethical products and by-products that do not disfavour the community (Bidgoli 2006). It relates to the aspects of sustainable development where the industrial activities of today do not compromise the survival of tomorrow’s generation. Most organizations have formulated a unique approach to CSR as indicated in a while.
Such companies have long-term strategies to ensure their compliance with the legal, ethical, social, and environmental demands of the concerned societies. For example, GM Motors strives to provide the society with due comfort as one drives with a guaranteed safety on the roads (Schwartz 2011).
As a strategy, policies and business models that ensure the achievement of these provisions constitute the ethical and legal aspects of CSR. In this context, the organizations have developed safety mechanisms to guarantee this provision.
To improve the safety skills of a community, most organizations have organized education on issues affecting proper living. This aspect indicates the significance of CSR and its contribution to the corporate schemes (ETATS-UNIS 2007).
Providing the society with quality products is one of the ethical concerns of CSR. It is the mandate of the concerned organization to achieve value for money. Additionally, it is ethical to produce quality products that will eventually impress clients. Most organizations are in the forefront in quality provision.
Additionally, most organizations understand the benefits of quality products not only to the clients but also to the company’s growth (Stoian & Zaharia 2012). The strategies used by organizations working with local communities to embrace quality have been lucrative to the concerned entities.
The aspects of quality contribute vividly in the attainment of CSR objectives as mentioned earlier. Organizations focus on the product quality, excellence, and management quality (IISD 2011). These efforts eventually influence the company’s growth with successful results.
As another strategy, most organizations enhance the success of the society through ample impacts of CSR. The sustainable and profitable expansion of the company indicates economic sensitivity to the society. Nissan’s conformity to the international legal requirements, ethical issues within the industry, and environmental concerns form the substantial aspects in the realms of embracing CSR.
This provision contributes to the company’s CSR achievement. Most organizations trust the concerns of the public and endeavor in their capacity to ensure that the public attains their ethical rights for a sustainable development (Hunter & Piltzecker 2003). Recognizing the significance of every stakeholder in the operational context is a crucial phenomenon in most companies.
Thus, the company strives to attain beneficial management practices as it endures to conform to the demands of the CSR and dynamic world markets. It is evident that the integration of the CSR principles into the company operation enhances the aspects of compliance demanded.
Precisely, CSR endures to manage the viable business processes in order to inflict a remarkable impact on society. Another example is that Coca Cola Company has strived to achieve its objective through integration of CSR within their systems as a major regulatory factor.
The concepts of CSR demand socially sensitive regulations that hardly hinder projects meant to favor the well-being of the society. The efforts to provide striking products to customers with elegant services are major objectives of most organizations.
Nissan Motors; nonetheless, this does not compromise its goodwill for the society. Instead, the aspect has increased the humanitarian support to ensure that the company grows together with the society (Dahlsrud 2008). As a strategy, most organizations have focused on the humanitarian aids, educational support, and the environmental fortification.
For instance, as a policy of the company, Starbucks Company liaises with humanitarian organizations in order to reach varied masses globally. Its contributions to the society on charitable grounds are remarkable.
Additionally, the company emphasizes on the education of the current children for a sustainable future development (PROBST 2010). It is a business law to integrate such CSR principals within the business models in order to achieve full impact (Banerjee 2007).
CSR fronts numerous benefits to an organization that have established and ratified its principles. This is crucial in earning the public trust on operational and business grounds. One advantage of CSR in governance is the ability to develop competitive advantages over other contenders following its impacts on the society (IISD 2011).
CSR manages to enact social, ethical, economic, and environmental values in the organization. It is crucial to agree that CSR is no longer a mere provision in most organization but rather a necessity for sustainable development within the organization (Mullerat & Brennan 2010, P. 317).
Evidently, organizations have set their core CSR areas to help them realize its mandates to the public. It is crucial to agree that CSR contributes immensely to the corporate strategies and governance since it reshapes concerned organizations in the realms of their operations and service to the people.
Most organizations have incorporated the CSR principles as any other policies within their business models. This effort benefits the company in achieving its corporate objectives with limited hindrances. Organizations have varied economic, societal, and environmental strategies depending on their mission and passion for the society.
It is crucial to recognize individual/corporate strategies in order to design appropriate CSR objectives. Nonetheless, CSR has numerous benefits to both the concerned organization and society, which it serves. While considering the social objectives of CSR, the involved corporate will observe the issues relating to education, public services, rejuvenation, and workers volunteering.
Precisely, the concerned organization will observe the social aspects of the public upon ratifying the CSR principles. This provision is evident in Pepsi company following its passion to give back to the public (Egan & Mather 2005). The significance of CSR in this context is its ability to mould the company’s operations to observe the ethical and social aspects in its service delivery.
Eventually, most organizations incorporate CSR principles in their endeavors as mentioned earlier. The economic contributions of CSR relates to the issues of jobs, business principles, and product value (IISD 2011). Organization that observes CSR in this aspect will ensure that their products have the recommended value commensurate to their prices.
Contextually, General Electric Company (based in the U.S.) has observed the issues of the product value earning it a massive competitive advantage. Thus, CSR will force the concerned organization to enact business processes with positive influence on the society as indicated before (Beurden & Go¨ssling, 2008).
CSR is a self-regulating phenomenon whose benefits forces any given company to consider the concerns of its surrounding. Any responsible organization will embrace the aspects of CSR voluntarily since its benefits are bountiful. Attaining a positive public perception is a remarkable achievement for any organization aiming to expand its market territories.
As a strategy, most organizations have put varied strategies to ensure that they enact viable CSR in their daily operation (Hillenbrand, Money & Ghobadian 2013). The company has a globalized fame emerging from its competitive automobiles and participation in numerous global social events and policymaking. It is crucial to consider and understand the concepts of CSR in the Nissan’s context.
This is achievable by dividing its participation into several units that have added to the achievement of its CSR goals independently (Egan & Mather 2005). Numerous corporations have realized substantial profits in their business upon the ratification of viable CSR policies within their business models.
This incorporated the enactment of policies that considered the public interest and the current global demands in the realms of environment protection and economic intensification for poverty suppression (Borchgrave 2001).
As a strategy, most organizations have developed numerous key CSR areas to help them achieve their strategic goals in the realms of business and service provision to the society. To conform to the demands of CSR, companies have developed a philosophy that establishes a safe coexistence amid the society and nature.
In their endeavours, they strive to attain a sustainable and mobile society with limited adverse effects to the environment. Evidently, CSR endures to protect the interest of the society.
Most organizations have observed this demands hence established self-regulating policies that ensure a viable and sustainable environment (Nissan 2011). Despite the companies’ desire to attain huge returns, they prioritize the issues relating to the environment. Companies have identified three principal areas to achieve this mandate (Jakobsson & Ramzan 2008).
Firstly, most institutions endure to reduce the emission of CO2 and CO gases through the production of environmental friendly commodities. The emergence of new technologies forces organizations to reinvent vehicles that hardly utilize fossil fuels known to pollute the environment upon combustion.
This occurs besides the efforts to produce motors that hardly emit the known dangerous gases to the environment (Nissan 2011). Additionally, the company mandates to provide automobiles that would help in protecting the air, soil, and water among other lucrative resources. This will help the current and future generation in attaining a sustainably environment for other coming generations.
Establishing, developing, and championing these environmentally responsive technologies are core in this context. It is through technologies that the organization realizes its CSR through appropriate business models (Fischer 2009). Lastly, Nissan recycles numerous resources to ensure an efficient but sparing use of the available resources. This ensures little or no wastage of resources.
Most organizations have achieved their global might and business prevalence by fostering the individuality that exists amid employees and the society at large. Realizing the benefits of workforce diversity, and its impacts to the society are critical. Besides harnessing individual potentials, employees feel ethically valued hence ready to work and propel the company further (EC-COUNCIL PRESS 2011).
The diversity within the Nissan’s workforce fraternity is its driving force meant to achieve its client’s demands and attain a sustainable growth. As demanded by its CSR policies, the company has respect for diversity, creates a learning culture, embraces internal communication, and builds ambient workplaces (GEVA 2008).
These achievements have met the international standardization requirements regarding the establishment and ratification of CSR (Grünewälder, 2008).
As another strategy, numerous organizations dedicate their economic achievements to the society through ample impacts of CSR. The sustainable and profitable expansion of the company indicates economic sensitivity to the society. Nissan’s conformity to the international legal requirements, ethical issues within the industry, and environmental concerns form the substantial aspects in the realms of embracing CSR.
This provision contributes to the company’s CSR achievement. Nissan trusts the concerns of the public and endeavors in its capacity to ensure that the public attains their ethical rights for a sustainable development (Hunter & Piltzecker 2003). Recognizing the significance of every stakeholder in the operational context is a crucial phenomenon in most companies.
Thus, the company strives to attain beneficial management practices as it endures to conform to the demands of the CSR and dynamic world markets. It is evident that the integration of the CSR principles into the company operation enhances the aspects of compliance demanded. Precisely, CSR endures to manage the viable business processes in order to inflict a remarkable impact on society (Fifka 2013).
Conclusion
CSR is a critical provision in most organization meant to enact self-regulating policies. Most organizations strive to comply with the lawful, societal, ethical, fiscal, and environmental concerns in order to achieve their business objectives. CSR is voluntary requirement with its principles helping in conforming to the mentioned provisions with limited hindrance.
Contextually, most organizations have enacted CSR in numerous aspects ranging from their environmental concerns to the philanthropic passions. Organizations that chose to work with local communities employ different strategies.
The aspects of the society, environmental safety, quality, goodwill, internal governance, and promoting CSR through the value chain similarly demonstrate the concepts of CSR at the organizational level. CSR has numerous benefits, and it contributes immensely to the corporate success.
List of References
Banerjee, S2007, Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
Beurden, P. & Go¨ssling, T 2008, ‘The Worth of Values – A Literature Review on the Relation between Corporate Social and Financial Performance’, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 82, is. 1, pp. 407–424.
Bidgoli, H 2006, Handbook of Information Security Volume 3, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.
Borchgrave, A 2001, Cyber threats and information security: meeting the 21st century challenge, CSIS Press, Washington, D.C.
Calabrese, T 2004, Information security intelligence: cryptographic principles and applications, Delmar Learning, Clifton Park, NY.
Dahlsrud, A 2008, ‘How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Mgmt, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–13.
Egan, M & Mather, T 2005, The executive guide to information security: threats, challenges and solutions, Addison-Wesley, Indianapolis.
ETATS-UNIS 2007, Department of defense sponsored information security research: new methods for protecting against cyber threats, Wiley publishing, Indianapolis (Ind.).
Fifka, M 2013, ‘Corporate Responsibility Reporting and its Determinants in Comparative Perspective’, Review of the Empirical Literature and a Meta-analysis Journal, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–35.
Fischer, A 2009, Creating a national framework for cybersecurity: an analysis of issues and options, Nova Science Publishers, New York.
GEVA, A 2008, ‘Three Models of Corporate Social Responsibility: Interrelationships between Theory, Research, and Practice’, Business and Society Review, vo. 113, no. 1, pp. 1–41.
Grünewälder, A 2008, Corporate social responsibility: Implementation in German companies, GRIN Verlag GmbHm, München.
Hillenbrand, C., Money, K & Ghobadian, A 2013, ‘Unpacking the Mechanism by which Corporate Responsibility Impacts Stakeholder Relationships’, British Journal of Management, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 127–146.
Hunter, E & Piltzecker, T 2003, MCSE exam 70-296 planning, implementing and maintaining a Windows Server 2003 environment for an MCSE certified on Windows 2000: study guide & DVD training system, Syngress Pub, Rockland, MA.
IISD (International Institute for Sustainable Development) 2011, Corporate social responsibility (CSR). Web.
Jakobsson, M & Ramzan, Z 2008, Crimeware: understanding new attacks and defenses, Addison-Wesley, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Mullerat, R & Brennan, D 2010, Corporate social responsibility: the corporate governance of The 21st century, Kluwer Law International, Alphen.
Nissan 2011, Nissan’s Approach to CSR. Web.
Schwartz, M 2011, Corporate social responsibility: An ethical approach, Broadview Press, Peterborough.
Stoian, C & Zaharia, R 2012, ‘CSR development in post-communist economies: employees’ expectations regarding corporate socially responsible behaviour – the case of Romania’, Business Ethics: A European Review, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 380–401.