Ethics in Organizational Communication
In organizations across the globe, there are laid down structures formulated in to keep staff in healthy and stable mind in their duty of serving company’s interest through regulatory ethical communication models. These models define expected behavior, procedural patterns, and response to every deviation.
As a matter of fact, stable mind performs optimally with little or no supervision. In line with this, an organization will always work alongside its staff to promote healthy communication ethics by recognizing and where necessary, supporting staff that make steady commitment in practicing accepted desirable healthy organizational communication ethics in their work departments.
Thus, this reflective treatise attempts to explicitly identify reasons why communication ethics are key leadership and organization issues. The paper then presents a reflective personal philosophy concerning communication ethics and support the philosophy with quantifiable effectiveness.
Organizational and leadership ethics determine the level of participation by the employees who after interaction with each other, identify hale and hearty workplace interventions passed through a feasibility test for implementation to initiate cultural shift in organization. Besides, communication ethics define content policy based on the need to address work related habits in order to strike a balance on environmental friendly work place in practice.
Besides, the target of this policy implementation is the entire hierarchy of staff members from the top management to the casual laborers at bottom of the ladder. As a result of properly structured communication ethics, the work environment becomes holistic, soft and socially friendly to the staff.
Besides, healthy ethical communication culture creates structural goals which develop norms, expectations of specific behavior display, and appropriate guideline controlling interaction with one another. Thus, “as saliency, time, and willingness to communicate increase, coping and constructing, further along the continuum, may be chosen” (Modaff, DeWine, & Butler, 2008, p.23).
My personal philosophy concerning ethics would revolve around strong working culture, thus healthy work habits exists where ethics are fairly quick in response to a stimulus as they are aligned to organizational values characterized by smooth consistent operations, similar to a well maintained computer software program optimal in operation with very minor hiccups. In relation to this philosophy, the elements of aspiration and principles form the underlying regulatory mechanism (Zaremba, 2003).
Among the aspired ideals in this model will include the need for an organization to strive to develop good culture by fostering a strong alignment on the monitored path of achieving its goals, missions and vision. This will include written rules of engagement, expected behavior, and repercussions for deviation.
Each member of the organization community will become part of the philosophy upon confirming allegiance. Periodically, the organization will restructure these goals in consistency with the changing markets and requirement of its staff. Consequently, when people are absorbed and made to feel part of these goals, they would strive to give their best towards the organization (Elearn, 2006).
The part of principles will encompass laid down rules to enable the organization to be more efficient. This will be in the form of a well organized hierarchy of workforce from management with administrative roles to service providing worker. Managers are empowered by the organization’s constitution to perform the role of prefects and offer leadership solutions upon consultation with one another.
To control group behavior, desirable leadership attributes are necessary, which are possessed by the managers gained over time in experience. Management plans, tests and implement company policies in line with the preset ethical goals (Sinclair, 2010).
As human nature dictates, the above philosophy carries with it enticements. When these are timely offered, they may lead to a deep attachment with the object over which such a motivation token is given in a strategically planned communication model. “Strategic communication planning consists of one overarching principle (recognize) and three separate strategies, or practices: contain, cope, and construct” (Modaff, DeWine, & Butler, 2008, p.21).
Motivation can be in the form of behavior review and increment, recognition for a well performed duty, equality, and fair treatment. Whenever there is a strong professional relationship nurtured on the values of appreciation and respect, hidden talents are easily displayable and are needed for organizational ethical sustainability (Sinclair, 2010).
In conclusion, the aspect of organization communication system should be made effective in order to minimize conflict of interest. Thus, the concept of aspired and profiled structures must be laid down to aid exchange of information, professionalism, and pro-activeness in issue based interaction.
Organization Communication Skills Evaluation
Organization communication skills are acquired through series of and creativity inspiration in communication systems in organization. When successfully carried out, redundancy thus, emotional strains are kept at bay as constant interaction is a means of boosting confidence and personality a recipe for good organizational culture. Thus, this reflective treatise attempts to evaluate own organizational communication skills in order to develop a self evaluation skills that will facilitate development of a plan to improve one’s own communication.
My personal communication skills reflect on a constant communication culture characterized by individual professionalism, consistency, qualification, reverence in intra and inter personal relation, rule of consultation in intra personal operation, healthy working environment, sensitive management and personal organization with minimal complications on performance and health.
I have created a working stressors regulator by expressing anxieties proactively to exceedingly manage psychological and physical demands for comfortable cope up with the unfamiliar situations.
In addition, this regulator manages unrealistic personal pressure among other excessive demanding works and personal cognitive factors inclusive of health issues, relationship and inability to adjust to sudden changes (Elearn, 2006). Thus, I have managed to successfully handle personal communication challenges at work place, in family association, and physical health (Sockeley-Zalabak, 2011).
Self evaluation skills in communication ethics encompasses actual and expected outcome. Reflectively, “by promoting the principles of specialization, standardization, and predictability in organizations, classical theorists were essentially attempting to minimize the occurrences of misunderstandings” (Modaff, DeWine, & Butler, 2008, p.27). Therefore, self evaluation skills development should encompass these aspects.
I intend to set up simple practical strategies to get to know and offer solutions to personal artificial impairment in communication before it generates into an interaction risk or harm (Sinclair, 2010). Through designing tolerance model levels, the plan aims at developing dependence of interest attached to an activity, creating proactive relationships, and monitoring their interaction with physical and psychological health.
Eventual resilience will vary depending on the period taken to implement the plan which may totally be different from another. However, this must be accompanied by definite values. This is informed by the fact that “misunderstandings based on a conflict of values also occur when particular “voices” are not valued within an organization. Women and minorities in particular are faced with situations in which their contributions are not given due consideration, either intentionally or unintentionally” (Modaff, DeWine, & Butler, 2008, p.15).
In order to improve on ethics of personal communication, I would concentrate on establishing a good work intra and inter personal communication relationship as a security strategy for confidential sharing of work related hiccups with fellow employees or a trusted staff mate. In addition, I would concentrate on preventive policy of creating informal inter-group meetings where the staff is given an opportunity to share on experiences and encourage each other.
I would then research on any pre evidence of a recognizable stressor I know or ought to have known because of the work nature besides the work environment. Instead of playing blame game, I would then concentrate on addressing these issues and where necessary providing personal rehabilitation program since “misunderstandings that occur because of a disparity between individual and organizational values are not likely to be resolved easily, if at all” (Modaff, DeWine, & Butler, 2008, p.15).
In conclusion, it is in order to affirm that personal stress is as a result of improper handling of personal communication skills, disrespectful of the need to constantly monitor structures in place handling behavior and employee’s interests. In most cases, short term depression may be a challenging motivational factor when it falls under good stress.
However, prolonged periods of stress may be catastrophic in safety management, heart complications, substance abuse, irritability and anxiousness, failed relationships, indecisiveness, frequent headaches, and error prone as a result of communication breakdown. With a properly planned personal communication skills model, it is possible to accomplish proactive communication from within and without informal and formal interactions.
References
Elearn, J. (2006). Managing Health, Safety and Working Environment. Alabama: Elsevier.
Modaff, D. P., DeWine, S., & Butler, J. (2008). Organizational communication: Foundations, challenges, and misunderstandings (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
Sinclair, M. (2010). Fear and Self-Loathing in the City: A Guide to Keeping Sane in the Square Mile. London: Karnac Books.
Sockeley-Zalabak, P. (2011). Fundamentals of Organizational Communication: Knowledge, Sensitivity, Skills, Values. New York: Allyn & Bacon, Incorporated.
Zaremba, A. (2003). Organizational communication: foundations for business & management. California: Thomson/South-Western.