When confronted with the most critical factors in clinical judgment, nurses consider the decision about a patient’s anxieties, health issues, and needs and judgments regarding the possible future developments from the intervention (Tanner, 2006). Nurses must acknowledge the physiological, pathological, and diagnostic facets of a patient’s clinical manifestations and illnesses. Additionally, they should analyze the patients’ social and medical background knowledge to aid in decision-making. Their physical, interpersonal, and psychological well-being and coping mechanisms are required for making sound clinical judgments. An elaborate definition of clinical judgment includes establishing a clinical intervention baseline to aid with contemporary medical challenges presented. Nurses understand patients’ conditions better when they handle each issue individually or with the client’s family members to assist in communicating the expectations of each individual’s necessities.
Clinical judgment is the technique through which a nurse chooses what information to gather about a client, analyzes the data, arrives at a treatment procedure, and determines appropriate nursing interventions (Tanner, 2006). The clinical judgment process involves problem-solving, clinical judgment, and logical analysis of the patient’s data. Nurses are often confronted with a complicated intervention scenario; knowing how to react, whether instantly or later, successful application of these metrics enhances job competence and improves patient care. On the other hand, entry-level nurses must think analytically; they should understand how to detect a medical fault. They should further discern how a particular component of theoretical information applies in the treatment process and acquire technical knowledge that permits refining, expanding, and modifying academic knowledge to suit the treatment. According to Dr Tanner’s notion of clinical judgment, competence surpasses medical experience and is incomplete and ineffective on its own.
The article proposes a researched-based paradigm of clinical decision-making. The intervention procedure is broken into four distinct stages: noticing the aspects that will alter in clinical scenarios which demand attention (Tanner, 2006). The aspects comprise the physician’s vision of outstanding practice and ethics regarding the patient’s condition. Secondly, developing a sufficient comprehension of the medical circumstance to foster an appropriate reaction, commonly referred to as “interpreting.” The third stage includes choosing a path of action suitable for the particular case immediately or later, widely referred to as “responding.” Interpreting and responding are commonly intertwined; a nurse must understand and react to circumstances requiring clinical decision-making by evaluating the evidence, which will aid in responding to specific clinical findings. The final stage is called “Reflecting,” which involves paying attention to patients’ reactions during and after treatment. Reflection contributes to the continuing development of clinical knowledge and the ability for future clinical decision-making.
Wise and intelligent decisions are inherent in every circumstance involving clinical judgment, as wrong judgment may lead to severe conditions in the patient’s health (Tanner, 2006). Clinical education is enhanced by providing nurses with a supportive environment and workmates with established discipline and skills to foster reflections on treatment. Informed thinking necessitates accountability, linking one’s actions to possible consequences. Reflection also influences treatment outcomes, including enhancing knowledge and understanding of the repercussions of individual clinical medications.
In healthcare, intuition has always been related to experience, characterizing experienced practitioners. In the contemporary healthcare environment, when quantitative, evidence-based treatment is demanded, the role of intuition as an aspect of the judgment is frequently dismissed (Tanner, 2006). However, research suggests that intuition occurs due to expertise and is integral to clinical decisions. As a result, medical scholars state that the importance of intuition in clinical practice, administration, education, and clinical research cannot be overstated. Studies indicate that synthesizing information, skill, and work experience results in intuition development.
According to a study, intuitive rationale processes contribute to hospital practitioners’ judgment and decision-making. Despite some qualms about using the phrase “gut feelings,” many respondents expressed that their intuition did lead them, although they were vigilant not to be misled (Tanner, 2006). They were cautious since intuition lacks probative power, such as in medical cases. Although perspectives on the veracity of intuition differed, the majority concurred that intuition added value to their judgment. Intuition guides the clinical judgment process and acts as a trigger for more examinations, allowing for quick decisions when required and eliminating wasteful investigations. Most medical experts employed a combination of intuitive and quantitative thinking in their diagnosis process, although the equilibrium between the two was impacted by specialty and personality. I will synthesize information, skill, and work experience to foster intuition development based on research. I will further employ intuitive and quantitative thinking in my clinical decision-making process.
Clinical judgment is the technique through which a nurse chooses what information to gather about a client, analyzes the data, arrives at a treatment procedure, and determines appropriate nursing interventions. The clinical judgment process involves problem-solving, clinical judgment, and logical analysis of the patient’s data. Nurses are often confronted with a complicated intervention scenario; knowing how to react, whether instantly or later, successful application of these metrics enhances job competence and improves patient care. Research indicates that knowledge and experience are complementary in the clinical decision-making process. Studies indicate that synthesizing information, skill, and work experience results in intuition development. Most medical experts employ a combination of intuitive and quantitative thinking in their diagnosis process, although the equilibrium between the two is impacted by specialty and personality.
Reference
Tanner, C. A. (2006). Thinking like a nurse: A research-based model of clinical judgment in nursing. Journal of nursing education, 45(6), 204-211.