Instance of a School Fight: Case Transcription Report (Assessment)

Exclusively available on IvyPanda Available only on IvyPanda

Introduction

Assisting a child in their development is critical to the further growth and the development of a cognitive, emotional, and communicative insight. In order to identify challenges that a child may face during the developmental period and assist them in coping with the emergent difficulties, one should pay special attention to their interactions with their peers (Carey, Harris, Lee, & Aluede, 2017). Due to the lack of proper understanding of sharing as a concept, students may have conflicts at the school playground, which have to be addressed by offering therapy aimed at shaping their sense of empathy.

We will write a custom essay on your topic a custom Assessment on Instance of a School Fight: Case Transcription
808 writers online

In the case under analysis, a second-grade student starts a fight with his peers after refusing to share a swing set with them. Jonathan, the student, is a Native American and the only child in his family. While his cousins often come to visit him at his home, he usually assumes the role of a leader and makes his cousins follow him. Therefore, the lack of empathy and the inability to build an emotional connection with others, thus learning to value their feelings and needs, should be seen as the key problem in the described scenario.

The role of a counselor in the case mentioned above includes helping Jonathan define his emotions, acknowledge and accept the needs of others, and learn the essential playground etiquette. Jonathan is the only child that should be taken into consideration since it may indicate that the upbringing strategy that his parents use may have led to him failing to acknowledge other people’s needs. Alternatively, the student may suffer difficulties at home and vent his anger or irritation on other students. Thus, a counselor should assume the role of a mediator, conflict manager, and leader.

Transcription and Analysis

Verbatim TranscriptionCounseling Skills and CompetenciesEvaluation of the Counselor’s Response
Counselor (C): You seem to be upset.EmpathyThe counselor starts the discussion by asking the student to describe his feelings. Thus, an analysis can begin.
Jonathan (J): You bet I am!
C: Could you tell me why?Emotional support
J: Because they’re my swings, too!
C: What do you think happened in the playground?The counselor invites the student to analyze the situation, assisting him in recounting the events, and looking at them critically.
J: I wanted to play, and they didn’t let me!
C: How did that make you feel?EmpathyBy driving the discussion to the analysis of feelings, the counselor utilizes the Humanistic perspective of the Psychodynamic approach. Thus, the student is convinced to explore his emotional experiences.
J: I don’t know (shrugging his shoulders).
C: Please, try to tell me. Did you feel angry?Empathy
J: Yes, a lot. I wanted to have fun, too!
C: Right, after all, you had two classes, and you needed to have fun.EmpathySince the student seems to have trouble defining his emotions, the counselor exemplifies how emotional experiences can be described.
J: Yeah, it was English, and then Math, and I got so tired!
C: So you came to the playground…
J: … and I saw that kid on my swings!
C: You must have been very annoyed.EmpathySimilarly, since the student is experiencing difficulties defining his emotions, the Counselor assists him in denoting his feelings.
J: Yeah, I couldn’t get on my swings!
C: I see. Is that student from your class?The counselor sets the premises for the analysis of the case and the introduction of the idea of appreciating others’ emotions to Jonathan.
J: Yes.
C: So you’ve had the same classes.
J: Right.
C: Then he must have been pretty tired, too.The Counselor carefully suggests the idea of empathizing with others and their feelings to the student in accordance with the key principles of the Psychodynamic approach.
J: But he could have used another one! There’s plenty of other things! There’s the playhouse, and the slides, and the seesaw…
C: So the slides aren’t yours?
J (reluctantly): No, they’re for everyone.The conflict between the Id and the Superego is identified at the specified point of the discussion according to the principles of the Psychodynamic theory (Hohenshil, Amundson, ‎& Niles, 2015). Particularly, the Psychoanalytical part of the framework is deployed to analyze the core of the conflict. Facing the scenarios to which the student is not used to, specifically, the unavailability of a particular toy, he uses force as opposed to reasoning in accordance with the principle of regression (Corey, 2015). Thus, the counselor has to teach the student to apply different behavioral strategies to resolve the identified conflict.
C: Then, why should the swing set be any different?
J: Because I like it!
C: Other children may like it, too.
J: So what?
C: How about sharing it?Open question
J: How do you share a swing?The specified exchange shows that the student is becoming open to the idea of solving conflicts in a more mature way.
C: You can take turns.Suggestion
J: What if I don’t want to wait for my turn?The counselor points to the significance of communication skills and the need for the student to learn socially acceptable behaviors. At the specified stage of the analysis, when the student welcomes a positive change, the suggestion of other behaviors is very timely.
C: Well, that’s how you behave in a team. But if you really want it, you can ask nicely, and other kids may share it with you.Negotiation
J: (sulkily) That’s stupid. What if they don’t let me?
C: Yes, that can happen. But hitting them won’t do you any good. If you hurt people just because they don’t do what you want, they won’t want to play with you or be your friends.The Counselor explains that fighting is not only useless but also harmful in the long term since it will destroy the student’s chances of gaining friends.
J: So I can’t fight with them, and I have to ask them whenever I want the swing. They’ll make a laugh out of me!The specified point of the discussion is critical since the child indicates his fear and, thus, motivation for violent behavior is. He is afraid of losing control and authority over his peers. Being incapable of maintaining any other type of relationship, Jonathan is at a loss.
C: Jonathan, other children like you not because you can win in a fight. They like you because you think up fun games like the one you did yesterday.GenuinenessThe counselor’s response is critical at the specified point of the discussion. The counselor points to the fact that Jonathan’s priorities in conversing with his peers are misaligned, and that he needs to change his behavior for other children to communicate with him. The response shows the student that people value him for his other qualities, thus prompting empathy and the willingness to change.
J: So they won’t laugh?
C: If you are friendly and believe what you say, they certainly won’t. In fact, you can teach them a couple of things about sharing!GenuinenessThe specified moment of the conversation is also critical to the further outcome of the dialogue. The student is provided with a new role that will allow him to change his behavior naturally. Since Jonathan is afraid of losing his power that he currently exerts over other children, it is necessary to show him that he can win their friendship and respect with other strategies. Specifically, the role of a peer educator and the charismatic leader of a team will assist Jonathan in transferring from one mode of behavior to another.
J: (surprised): Me?
C: Sure! A lot of kids need to learn how to share and why it’s important.Positive rewardThe counselor explains to the student that he is not alone in managing anger and experiencing the emotions that are typically termed as negative, such as greediness and jealousy. Thus, instead of condemning these feelings, the counselor explains that others also have these feelings, points to the need to recognize them, learn the reasons for experiencing them, and develop the strategies for managing them.
J: And how am I supposed to do that?
C: Well, you can start by saying you have a great idea about stopping fighting on the playground.Negotiation
J: And then I’ll tell them how to share and take turns.Instead of arguing against the solution provided by the counselor, the child offers his solutions to the possible confrontations that he may face in the playground. The observed phenomenon indicates that the student is ready to make a positive shift.
C: That’s right.
J: Well, I’ll try, but what if other kids start hitting me?
C: You should tell me, and we’ll have a conversation together.Emotional support
J: But wouldn’t that be bad? Like, telling on someone?
C: Of course not. You won’t be telling on them to get them punished – you will tell me about it because you want to get the problem solved, is that right?
J: I guess…
C: I’m happy to hear that, Jonathan. We are very happy to have you here, and with a little change, you will make a lot of friends here. Come here whenever you need to talk.Emotional supportJonathan accepts the proposed solution, which means that the conversation should be over. The counselor explains that the student will be provided with the necessary support.
J: Okay, bye.
C: Bye.

Table 1. Transcript of the Conversation with the Student.

Theory and the Interview Questions

In order to approach the case described above, one should use the Psychodynamic approach as the key counseling theory. By definition, the Psychodynamic framework implies that each person is unique and thus needs to be approached in an entirely original fashion, thus allowing a counselor to incorporate the Humanistic and Psychoanalytic strategies (Foxx, Baker, ‎& Gerler, 2016). Particularly, the Psychodynamic framework will allow determining the external factors that may be damaging the development of the child (Barish, 2018). For instance, the factors that motivate the child to behave in a specified manner and refuse to share the swing set with other children, as well as a fight instead of communicating calmly, will be located.

The questions of the interview align with the selected theory fully. Particularly, at the beginning of the conversation, the counselor does not attack the child by accusing him of violence but, instead, asks about his feelings. The unexpected turn of the dialogue takes the child by surprise, and he explains sincerely what bothers him. Afterward, the discussion diverges smoothly to the analysis of the factors that make the student feel the urge to fight.

Thus, anger management issues are identified and discussed successfully. The specified step leads to the next stage of the conversation when the counselor asks the child about the worries and anxieties that he has. Consequently, the counselor discovers the core of the problem in the process. Specifically, the fact that being the only child, Jonathan does not have the habit of sharing is recognized and taken into consideration.

1 hour!
The minimum time our certified writers need to deliver a 100% original paper

The final questions launch the negotiation process and help the student to recognize the fact that his behavior is unacceptable, also prompting the desire to change. Consequently, the child becomes open to the suggestions that the counselor has to offer, and the student selects the behavior with which he is most comfortable and which helps him manage conflicts on the playground constructively. The Psychodynamic framework allowed facilitating awareness in the child and assisting him in shaping his behavior and recognizing his emotional and social needs, as well as the needs of others.

Self-Reflection

The case described above provided a profound insight into the theory of counseling and the use of counseling skills as the means of prompting a behavior change in students. Specifically, the case has shown the significance of recognizing the need for individuals to develop positively and socialize effectively in the academic environment. Utilizing the Psychoanalytic approach helped the student to acknowledge the problem and strive to resolve it by shaping his behavior. Thus, the self-knowledge that was acquired during the session included the ability to distinguish between different scenarios in which appropriate counseling theories should be deployed.

In addition, the case helped to develop the self-knowledge associated with emotional intelligence (EI). Although sometimes being underestimated, EI as a counseling skill is critical for identifying the presence of a problem in a student’s development, which the case in question has shown quite clearly. Particularly, the dialogue with the student has revealed that the counselor was capable of locating a problem in his development based on the changes in his emotional patterns. In addition, the selected theoretical framework, which allowed appealing to the learner’s emotions directly, served as the tool for giving the learner agency in his further self-improvement actions. Therefore, the counselor has learned to provide students with independence and encourage self-introspect in them to motivate them to change.

However, the transcript has also shown that the counselor could improve certain skills and focus on acquiring new abilities in the future. For instance, the counselor did not use open questions in order to invite the student to contemplate the problem under analysis. Thus, the counselor should use different techniques for prompting dialogue and eliciting information. In addition, the counselor may need to acquire the skill of self-disclosure (Barish, 2018). Being a powerful tool for helping students to share their emotional experiences, self-disclosure can be deemed as a critical skill that the counselor has to develop.

Thus, the overall counseling experience can be regarded as positive. The student has been convinced to alter his behavior, whereas the counselor has learned to deploy the theory rooted in the understanding of external and integral factors shaping a child’s choices. Due to proper timing, adequate responses, and the selection of the appropriate theory, the counselor managed to elicit a positive response from the student and convince him to shape his behavior.

References

Barish, K. (2018). How to be a better child therapist: An integrative model for therapeutic change. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.

Carey, J. C., Harris, B., Lee, S. M., & Aluede, O. (2017). International handbook for policy research on school-based counseling. New York, NY: Springer.

Remember! This is just a sample
You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers

Corey, G. (2015). Theory and practice of group counseling (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.

Hohenshil, T. H., Amundson, N E., ‎& Niles, S. G. (2015). Counseling around the world: An international handbook. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

Foxx, S. P., Baker, S. B., ‎& Gerler, E. R. (2016). School counseling in the 21st century (6th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

Print
Need an custom research paper on Instance of a School Fight: Case Transcription written from scratch by a professional specifically for you?
808 writers online
Cite This paper
Select a referencing style:

Reference

IvyPanda. (2020, December 20). Instance of a School Fight: Case Transcription. https://ivypanda.com/essays/instance-of-a-school-fight-case-transcription/

Work Cited

"Instance of a School Fight: Case Transcription." IvyPanda, 20 Dec. 2020, ivypanda.com/essays/instance-of-a-school-fight-case-transcription/.

References

IvyPanda. (2020) 'Instance of a School Fight: Case Transcription'. 20 December.

References

IvyPanda. 2020. "Instance of a School Fight: Case Transcription." December 20, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/instance-of-a-school-fight-case-transcription/.

1. IvyPanda. "Instance of a School Fight: Case Transcription." December 20, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/instance-of-a-school-fight-case-transcription/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Instance of a School Fight: Case Transcription." December 20, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/instance-of-a-school-fight-case-transcription/.

Powered by CiteTotal, easy essay citation creator
If you are the copyright owner of this paper and no longer wish to have your work published on IvyPanda. Request the removal
More related papers
Cite
Print
1 / 1