Legal Implications of the Canadian Passport Term Paper

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® • No AI

Executive Summary

A passport is an individual identification and travel card for interior use issued by a supreme state, usually to its individual residents, and foreigners as well. Most common are the passports that are issued by countries depending on a person’s nationality. Though they may seem to be very official, they may be unauthorized. Passports sold or given out by profit-making sellers are usually illegal and, thus, worthless. Many regimes delegate attorneys to operate as their official representatives on second nationality matters. Also, there are particular travel credentials such as diplomatic passports, which are given out by certain countries or worldwide institutes. Diplomatic passports are usually legal if given out by the worldwide institute the person stands for or property authorities of the state , and only in situations whereby the passport owner is properly qualified as an envoy in the receiving country.

Raising habitation necessities to qualify as residents is one alternative for tackling problems brought about by the passport package. Canada’s three year occupant condition for citizenship after being given permanent habitation status is very short, comparing with other countries. For instance, the United States and Britain normally necessitates five years while Germany necessitates eight. Whereas some may see raising citizenship necessities as anti-migration, this outlook is erroneous. To the opposite, higher residence necessities would arrange applicants depending on their intentions. People looking for the passport package solely would see longer residency as expensive. Those planning to live in Canada would also face some impediment in gaining nationality, but could subsist in Canada in the course of the delay. Adopting longer habitation requirements would generate more space in immigration streams for those who would add greatly to Canada.

A Canadian passport is a precious file that must be reserved in a protected place at every time. Once a passport is announced to be missing or stolen, it becomes invalid and thus can not be used for travel. This guarantees that it is not used for illegal functions. However, Passport Canada or the Government of Canada cannot be held accountable for any problems at boundary crossing when one tries to make use of a passport that has been announced missing or stolen.

Introduction

A Canadian passport is normally issued to Canadians for the utility of worldwide travel; letting the possessor to travel in overseas countries in agreement with visa necessities; calling for the fortification of the passport owner while overseas and easing the procedure of securing aid from Canadian consular officials overseas, if essential (Zhang, 2006). However, a Canadian passport cannot be used as a main testimony of Canadian nationality in Canada. As a result, it cannot be used to obtain an identification card, a nationality certificate or a driver’s license.

In Canada, each passport application is established solitary by three distinct federal government agencies. These three country wide agencies which collect passport applications include: Canada Post, Service Canada and Passport Canada (Citizenship and Immigration Canada, 2011). Although passport Canada is regarded as the most straight venue to get hold of a passport, the other two agencies complement these services, mainly in cases where accessing public services has been hard traditionally. A part from the case of children who are under three years, Canadian passports are legitimate for five years. For this special group of children, under three years, passports are legitimate for three years.

Normally, it takes ten weeks to develop requests sent by letters in Canada or presented through a receiving agent, Service Canada or Canada Post. Developing applications sent by mail from the United States takes at least 15 weeks (Zhang, 2006).

Barely two yeas ago, only 56.2% of Canadians had a legitimate Canadian passport (Vancouver, 2009). Even though these passports are owned by individuals, they remain to be a property of the Government of Canada (Fong, 2006). In the year 2010, Passport Canada confirmed that the issuing of e-passports would commence in a span of two years (Citizenship and Immigration Canada, 2011). This will allow Canada to hold fast to international values and preserve the simplicity of intercontinental travel that Canadians presently take pleasure in.

Dual citizenship was originally recognized by Canada in the year 1970. It is now allowed in some shape by more than one hundred and fifty countries, with South Korea, China and Cuba being distinguished exceptions (Zhang, 2006; Granatstein, 2006).

The passport package can be tailored by making its fortification be valid only to those dual citizens who have shown themselves overseas as Canadians (Hansen, 2006). To achieve this, a tourist would be forced to apply for a similar visa and be subject to similar circumstances as other Canadians, although they could shun these conditions by using other passports to travel. This loom has the appeal of having natives who wish to be taken care of as Canadians take a trip as Canadians. Conversely, it creates differences that would be hard to implement. In a calamity, it would mean vacating some citizens and leaving others. Also, help could be deprived of to some incarcerated Canadians.

Fong (2006) also asserts that a more radical resolution would be to prohibit Canadians from owning dual citizenship. Any Canadians obtaining other citizenship would be considered to have forsaken their Canadian citizenship and potential citizens would be required to forsake all other citizenships. Barring dual citizenship may dishearten persons from immigrating to Canada who alternatively would consider staying there.

Issuing passports in Canada is an imperial prerogative but not an Act of Parliament. As articulated in the passport note, passports are given out in the specific name of the monarch in power. Nevertheless, the role of issuing passports is entrusted to Passport Canada.

Applying for a Passport

So as to obtain a Canadian passport, candidates must complete the necessary forms. They must have two passport images and a confirmation from a guarantee. Policies regarding replacement of passports and the confirmation from guarantors were last restructured in 2007 (Department of Justice Canada, 2011). Currently, applicants may replace the passport by use of a short request form, provided that they are inhabitants in Canada at the time of application, subsisted in Canada and were more than sixteen years old at the instant of their earlier application and are in ownership of a Canadian passport that was given out under their present name subsequent to January 31, 2002, is legitimate for five years, and not spoilt or reported missing or stolen (Department of Justice Canada, 2011). Furthermore, a guarantor could be a Canadian who at the moment owns a valid or less than one year expired, five-year Canadian passport; has recognized the candidate for over two years; is above eighteen years old; and were above sixteen years during their own passport application (Zhang, 2006). For the populace overseas, high commissions, local embassies or consulates hand in passport requests to a passport centre (Ley, & Kobayashi, 2005).

Types of passports

Prior to 1947, there were only two kinds of passports. At present, there are six kinds of Canadian passports. According to Vancouver (2009), “these six types of passports include: regular passport, frequent traveler passport, temporary passport, emergency passport, special passport and diplomatic passport.

A regular passport is normally issued for travel purposes. It has 24 pages. Its validity period differs with the age or maturity of the passport owner. According to Vancouver (2009), children aged from three to fifteen years and grown up aged from sixteen years and above acquire passports with a validity of up to five years. Children aged below three years acquire passports with a validity of up to three years.

Frequent traveler passports are normally given to regular travelers, like businessmen. The cost of frequent travelers passports is normally high than that of a regular passport (Vancouver, 2009). These passports have forty eight pages and have similar durations of validity with the regular passports. Temporary passport are usually given out to Canadians with a pressing and confirmed need for a provisional passport while out of the country. Emergency passports (are normally given to Canadians for straight come back to Canada or to a different Canadian mission where complete passport services may be available (Passport Canada, 2005) Special passports are normally given out to people in lieu of the Canadian administration on official dealings, among them being members of parliament, cabinet members and public servants (Passport Canada, 2005). Finally, diplomatic passports are usually given to Canadian envoys, diplomatic messengers, top position government officers, and residents designated as diplomatic delegates (Vancouver, 2009).

Physical appearance

Standard Canadian passports typically have the Royal Arms of Canada inscribed in the centre of the face cover and are usually deep navy blue in color (Department of Justice Canada, 2011). Vancouver (2009) explains that the statements “PASSPORT•PASSEPORT” are inscribed below the coat of arms, and “CANADA above” (p.47). The passport’s cover shows the textual parts of Canadian passports being written in the two official languages in Canada, English and French. According to Department of Justice Canada (2011), a typical passport has 24 pages, ID-3 size, and 125 × 88 mm with novel security facets akin to those on bank notes having been supplemented.

According to the Department of Justice Canada (2011), the personal data page for Canadian passports contains:

“Photo of the passport holder, Type (P), Issuing Country (listed as “CAN” for “Canada), Passport No., Surname, Given Names, Nationality (Canadian/Canadienne), Date of Birth, Sex, Place of Birth (The city and country are listed, even if born outside Canada), Date of Issue, Issuing Authority, Date of Expiry, the signature of the passport holder and the information page ends with the Machine Readable Zone” (p.1).

Furthermore, the Department of Justice Canada (2011) explains that inside the Canadian passport is a note which states,

“The Minister of Foreign Affairs of Canada requests, in the name of Her Majesty

the Queen, all those whom it may concern to allow the bearer to pass freely without let or hindrance and to afford the bearer such assistance and protection as may be necessary” (p.1).

Passports issued from 2007 onwards have an emblem for the Federal Department of Foreign Affairs Canada (Department of Justice Canada, 2011)

Ethics

Those applying for passports may ask, in script, that their state of origin is not listed on the data page of the passport (Service Canada, 2011). In reaction to China government, adjustments to the necessities for the issuance of visas exist. Passports given out to Canadians who are born in Macau or Hong Kong just list the location of birth, devoid of a complementary country code, except upon appeal (Skelton, C. 2006). The place of birth of Canadian residents who are born in Jerusalem is only recognized by the city’s name, lacking state designation, due to the unsettled lawful condition of Jerusalem.

Passport Canada, the main body entrusted with issuing passports in Canada, ensures that Canadian travelers get to know of any changes that may occur in the processes or procedures of issuing passports. This body also motivates Canadians to commence their travel files application procedure as soon as they start to plan to travel, so as to make sure that the right documentation is acquired in good time, prior to an overseas trip (Service Canada, 2011).

Parents and authorized guardians are normally required to plan for additional time so as to ensure that they obtain right documentation before presenting travel document requests for their children. In case the right documentations are not presented, it is likely that the child’s application for travel credentials will be cast off.

Laws Regarding Canadian Passports

Any person found in possession of a vague passport that was initially given out to a direct member of his family shall undergo interception followed by a revocation of the passport in agreement with Canadian Passport Order (CPO) paragraph 10(2)(b.

Any passport owned by a person who has unmodified credentials of two of his kids shall undergo revocation grounded on paragraph 10(2) (b) and 10(2) (c) of the CPO correspondingly. In such a case, the impact of a pronouncement by third parties not to instigate the criminal procedure will result to suspension of the passports, depending on the aggravating and mitigating reasons. The mitigating reasons leading to retaining could be admittance, support and demand by the family. Conditions not favoring retaining could include: having acted on charitable reasons and earning pecuniary losses. The aggravating factor in this case could be latent effect on the children’s travel in prospect. Merging the aggravating and mitigating grounds could result to a 15-month lessening of the suggested five-year suspension time. Accompanying outsiders is a disparity on the prior type, whereby the third individual being ushered is carrying a fake document that is typically altered (Zhang, 2006).

A case of overseas interception in the companionship of travelers with distorted passports could be interpreted as promoting unlawful migration. In such, a revocation as stated by 10 (b) of the CPO could be sustained in the reasoning that the alien authority, by failing to file unlawful charges against the person vindicated her (Department of Justice Canada, 2011). This verdict shows how the predominance of proof is established, by investigating the credibility of the negation and substantiation filed.

A case of overseas Interception in the companionship of an individual with a fake passport could be interpreted as enhancing unlawful migration. In such, a revocation as stated by 10(2) (b) of the CPO could be sustained from the date associated with the day on which the identified offence was denied, rather than a succeeding statement for a limited legitimacy passport claim on empathetic grounds. Impermanent passport services issued on empathetic basis are not perched for a specified duration. Identical application may basically be discarded as stated by 9(a) of the CPO.

The recognized standard in the file is that a provisional passport application on imperative compelling empathetic situation that is discarded on the grounds of information considered dissenting cannot result in deferment, for a fixed time, of prospect applications on similar basis (Passport Canada,2011). Lending credentials is at times done for payment, and at times simply as a favor, to let a third person to penetrate the state either by changing the document by replacing his/her personal photograph or by pretending to be the legal holder, the lender, at the position of entry.

In a situation whereby loss of a passport has been affirmed and then the document is intercepted with a third party the person is charged with credibility of dissent of having permitted use of his passport. In such, revocation as required by 10(2) (c) (d) of the CPO is sustained. Evidence could be collected during discussions with consular officials leading to deferment of passport services valid to all types of travel files. The suggestion for deferring services for five years could be maintained, though, as of the day on which presumption of theft was replaced with theory of loss, and not the day of the very last accounts in support of the novel presumption.

Whereby a person lends a passport to an allied individual, and the subject admits, the scale and reason of the subjective test could be to decide on the sanction to enforce. In such a scenario, revocation of the passport as stated in 10(2) (c) of the CPO could be maintained.

This verdict elucidates the two steps in arbitrating approval to revoke passports and deny passport services. In this particular file, key mitigating conditions could have influenced the adjudicator’s verdict to affect a 24-month decrease to the suggested 5-year period of holding back passport services.

Letting another individual to use one’s passport could be interpreted as omission or an act that could probably result to unlawful use of the passport. Handing over a passport to a third party infringes the duty to maintain the passport. In such a situation, proposal to revoke as stated by 10(2) (c) can not be accepted. Letting another individual to make use of the passport could be construed as referring to the passport’s principal use. In other words, allowing somebody to utilize the passport for distant travel. In such a scenario, it could be unsuitable to impose endorsements for an imaginary circumstance that could incriminate the possessor in a third party, giving offences that did not take place or that could be irrational to think but. It could be alleged that the subject, by allowing another individual to utilize his/her own passport, infringed his duty to safeguard the passport and to be the solitary individual who is supposed to use it. Such a duty could be sanctioned once more if the breach by deliberate act, omission or negligence led to deceitful utilization of the document by a third party, for exactly those functions for which the passport was given out (Department of Justice Canada, 2011).

Modifying of passports in Canada happens decreasingly, mainly since the establishment of the novel blueprint of the passport booklet and the necessity of personal passports for small children. Prior to 2004, the names of small children could be slotted in on a remarks tag attached to the visa sheets of the parents’ passports. Faced with the panorama of fraudulent inclusion of remarks tags becoming prevalent, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) pioneered the principle for each person to have a distinct passport (Department of Justice Canada, 2011). In compliance to this standard, Canada moderated the financial bang on families by instituting a plan with cheap fees for passports of small children.

Application of Legal Cases Learnt

Despite the fact that the concept of similar fact substantiation is derived from criminal law, it can be used to settle on the span of the time during which overhauls should be suspended, if it is considered rational to impose such a phase. Cases that have some connection with the subject of the executive suggestion, be it direct or inferred, assist in determining whether a character exhibits a trend or side view of the type of delinquency that Passport Canada is determined to discourage and sanction.

Cases should encompass some likeness with the event that has provoked the suggestion. This can be done by considering the mitigating factors and aggravating factors. Considering the case of Canadian passports, there are more reasons that can be cited for revoking or deferring passport services. For instance: ownership of fake travel documents, unlawful accusations set against the subject and movement limitations that are dictated by a court.

A sanctioning in the CPO provision can be feasible regardless of the verity that the passport may not have been employed towards its prime function, which is to aid outside travel. To begin with, passports are as well used as credentials representing identity. Second, every time a passport is distorted, regardless of the end followed by the use of the distorted document, or its alleged depiction in a scanned tainted image or copy, the giver of the passport and the passport itself must be leveraged in the charge of an offence.

Limited validity passport (LVP) service can be reflected on in a case of a life threatening sickness of a family element, pending the end of a security examination on his customary passport appliance, upon tabling of a divide standard request (Zhang, 2006). A candidate is required to present himself to an issuing agency to fill the form, give the appropriate fee and carry along documentation that backs up the forceful and pressing nature of his appeal.

Subsequent to reception of a decision, the subject may write to the judge seeking to know the effect of a decision on his nationality, and requesting for a file appraisal. In case, the adjudicator substantiates that the verdict firmly pertains to an appeal for Temporary Passport Services due to imperative compelling empathetic considerations, the decision will not affect his Canadian citizenship.

In cases whereby the regular passport request are still imminent, the objectivity and impartiality to judge the file qualities when and if the office conveys plans to revoke regular passport services must be secured.

Simplified revocation procedure, is employed in files that have explicit conditions for denial or revocation and those that have trustworthy information. Such information should be simply verifiable. In such cases the Passport Canada agrees with the claimant or passport owner in script to recommend that his/her request is being rejected or is being revoked. Such a resolution stays in effect up to the time when the client elucidates any erroneous information. The subject should be informed that an appeal to evaluate the decision may be prepared with the adjudicator of Passport Canada.

The notion of the equivalency test that relates to files whereby the subject is arraigned outside Canada with the charge of an offence that would make up an impeachment offence, if charged in Canada. As a result, any dispute that may have tried to indicate that the revocation and deferring of passport services would be premature should be discarded.

The CPO offers power to reject to issue a passport to an individual already in detention of a legitimate passport. Nevertheless, from a prejudiced standpoint, passport holders can claim new passports when their existing legal documents are about to expire. In such occasions, applicants give in their old passports that are at the verge of expiring. The agency calls off the old passport and gives out a novel one.

The agency can suggest revocation if it finds out that the passport that is still valid but about to expire was suspected to have been employed to commit a chargeable offence. If these conditions were absent, the application would apparently have been processed with no further impediment. The suggestion to decline to issue the passport as stated in 9(g) of the CPO can be carried out without upsetting the objective and function of the provision, which is to stop the double ownership of Canadian passports.

In a situation whereby loss of a passport has been affirmed and the document is intercepted with a third party the person is charged with credibility of dissent of having permitted use of his passport. In such, revocation as required by 10(2) (c) (d) of the CPO is sustained. Letting another individual to use one’s passport could be interpreted as omission or an act that could probably result to unlawful use of the passport. Handing over a passport to a third party infringes the duty to maintain the passport. In such a situation, proposal to revoke as stated by 10(2) (c) can not be accepted. It could be alleged that the subject, by allowing another individual to utilize his/her own passport, infringed his duty to safeguard the passport and to be the solitary individual who is supposed to use it infringed his duty to safeguard the passport and to be the solitary individual who is supposed to use it. Such a duty could be sanctioned once more if the breach by deliberate act, omission or negligence led to deceitful utilization of the document by a third party, for exactly those functions for which the passport was given out (Department of Justice Canada, 2011).

Recommendations and Lessons Learnt

Basing on the foundations set out in the Canadian Passport Order, Passport Canada can revoke a passport or decline to renew or give out a passport. Such foundations could be: criminality, perversion in getting a passport and failure to present a full application. Nevertheless, whether a Canadian passport should be revoked or rejected on the center of public security alarm is an issue that has much been debated. I shall summarize this section by narrating the encounter of Abdurahman Khadr. In the year 2004, Abdurahman Khadr was deprived of a Canadian passport by the then Canadian Governor on the basis of the state security of Canada and the guard of Canadian hordes in Afghanistan. The regime invoked imperial prerogative in order to disallow Khadr a passport, since state security was not aligned in the Canadian Passport Order as a basis for denial by then, although, , on September 22, 2004, section 10.1 was supplemented to Canadian Passport Order, letting the Minister to reject or revoke a passport as a result of state security distress.( Renshon, 2002).

Khadr searched for the judicial evaluation of the minister’s verdict to decline his passport, and in the following year, 2008, the Federal Court declared that the regime did not have the authority to turn down Khadr’s passport in the lack of a definite authority defined in the Canadian Passport Order. If the order were to be amended, as it had been the verity, Khadr would probably lack capability to dispute the revocation. In March 2008, the Federal Court confirmed section 10.1 of the Order to be unauthorized and thus invalid, although the court perched its declaration of invalidity for sometime so as to give the government duration to adjust the order. The federal regime instigated an appeal and a ruling issued in January, 2009 reversed the lower court verdict in March 2008. The court collectively agreed that the refutation of passport service on state basis is in agreement with the Charter, quoting the restriction clause as its chief decision spot.

Thus, the denial of passport service on state basis is in agreement with the Charter, with the restriction clause quoted as its chief decision spot up to date.

Other Recommendations

Before obtaining a passport, it is important to ensure that it orders extensive acceptance and reputation in the global community. If it’s unlikely to be acknowledged by all other nations, it is of no value from the beginning. In this era of direct communication, it requires only hours or a few days, prior to the international customs and immigration administrators detecting fake passports.

If you plan to become a resident of another country, and perhaps spend time there, your reflection should include: language, geographic site, solidity of the legal and political structure, trade environment, banking and visa-free travel potential (Dobrota & Gloria, 2006).

Canadians may desire to reconsider the center on which individuals become citizens through ancestry, habitation, or birth. In every case, alterations could be made that place larger emphasis on similarity to Canada.

Raising habitation necessities to qualify as residents is one alternative for tackling problems brought about by the passport package. Canada’s three year occupant condition for citizenship after being given permanent habitation status is very short, comparing with other countries. For instance, the United States and Britain normally necessitates five years while Germany necessitates eight (Wagner, 2006). Whereas some may see raising citizenship necessities as anti-migration, this outlook is erroneous. To the opposite, higher residence necessities would arrange applicants depending on their intentions. People looking for the passport package solely would see longer residency as expensive (History of passports, 2011). Those planning to live in Canada would also face some impediment in gaining nationality, but could subsist in Canada in the course of the delay. Adopting longer habitation requirements would generate more space in immigration streams for those who would add greatly to Canada.

Ancestry as a foundation to nationality could be adapted to create an anticipation of recognition with Canada. Second and afterward generations born overseas could be anticipated to at least take constructive ladders at age 18 to maintain their Canadian nationality (Konrad & Nicol, 2008).

The current basis for automatic nationality by birth covers likelihoods varying from, at one corner, being born to travelers or illegal inhabitants who come to Canada purposely to qualify their offspring to be Canadian citizens and those born in the country by Canadian parents. Granting nationality mechanically to children born to travelers or prohibited inhabitants appears atypically relative to the procedures and necessities anticipated from others. Policy makers should restore confidence in themselves that preserving these categories of nationality by birth are suitable components of the passport package.

Dual citizenship also ought to be eradicated. Dual citizenship refers to a situation whereby an individual can boast each or many of the civil rights and responsibilities that hold on to a citizen in all of the numerous countries in which he or she is a resident, in spite of of the length of duration of actual habitation in a state or the character of his or her fiscal ties (Renshon, 2002). Dual citizenship was originally recognized by Canada in the year 1970. It is now allowed in some shape by more than one hundred and fifty countries, with South Korea, China and Cuba being distinguished exceptions (Zhang, 2006; Granatstein, 2006).

The passport package could be tailored by making its fortification be valid only to those dual citizens who have shown themselves overseas as Canadians (Hansen, 2006). To achieve this, a tourist would be forced to apply for a similar visa and be subject to similar circumstances as other Canadians, although they could shun these conditions by using other passports to travel. This loom has the appeal of having natives who wish to be taken care of as Canadians take a trip as Canadians. Conversely, it creates differences that would be hard to implement. In a calamity, it would mean vacating some citizens and leaving others. Also, help could be deprived of to some incarcerated Canadians.

Immigrants frequently face uncertain endings and until they really experience living in Canada they may be reluctant to slash their home attachments. Yet staying in Canada as a lasting resident does not present the same protection of habitation as that accessible to citizens. Facing a desire to surrender their original nationality people may opt to immigrate to other nations. While such a plan would eradicate several who are just shopping for a further passport, Canada may also loose enviable potential settlers.

Supporting the Package

The passport package is sustained by taxes issued to Canadian administration. As a result of Canada’s utilization of habitation as a foundation for taxation, only individuals who subsist in Canada are deemed as inhabitants for tax reasons (Junor & Usher, 2004). To extend the support of the passport package, the Canadian government could adopt either of the two approaches. It could follow the US, by taxing its citizens everywhere they reside. Conversely, it could charge an exceptional passport replenishment fee for Canadians who are non-resident (Mintz, 2006). All of these looms would dishearten people who embrace Canadian citizenship merely for convenience by elevating their costs and at the same time, raising income from those who go on to cling to the passport package.

Relating income taxes to every citizen in spite of place of habitation would generate several troubles. The employment of taxes would not be impartial among citizens living in states with diverse levels of taxation. Agreements to avoid double taxation mean that Canadians living abroad gain the income taxes elsewhere (Mallan, 1995). Canadians paying small taxes where they live in may have to give considerably more taxes, while individuals facing lofty taxes would pay slight or nothing extra. For this last group, the appliance of the tax would not dishearten those sharing the Canadian passport simply for expediency, as they would put up with no extra costs.

A more considerable issue is the requirement to set up a reporting and observance apparatus, specifically for taxing Canadians existing overseas. An enhanced way to hold up the package would be by levying an exceptional passport rejuvenation fee for non-resident citizen who don’t pay any tax ( Ley & Kobayashi, 2005). This technique would use an accessible apparatus, the passport rejuvenation arrangements, for collecting the fee. It would too be self- enforcing as non-resident habitats would have to conform to hold on to their passport. It can be impartial by necessitating all non-resident people to donate the same quantity anywhere they live. Some would condemn this method for levying the similar fee to all non-resident people, in spite of of their financial class. Doing conversely would necessitate setting up a highly structured apparatus to settle on the capability to pay of individual non-residents.

Application to its Scenario in regard to loss in a foreign Country

If a passport is stolen or missing, the holder is expected to explain the conditions of the loss or theft to the local police and Passport Canada. In case you are in another country, out of Canada, you will be expected to report the loss or theft to the nearby government of Canada office in that country and to the local police. Nevertheless, prior to replacement of the document, Canadian authorities normally carry out investigations on the event. This normally results to delays in handing out the substitute passport. A substitute passport, which could only be legitimate for a restricted period, may be endorsed if strict necessities are met. This involves the giving in of a fulfilled application form ratified by your underwriter; documentary proof of Canadian citizenship; two similar, modern photos; suitable fee; and a legal declaration regarding the missing Canadian passport.

The principle of substantiation for passport negation, revocation and preserving suggestions is a balancing of likelihoods, a sort of negation required to offset circumstantial evidence. For circumstantial evidence to guide a judge to discover that a person’s statements are not honest, the sequence and arrangement of factors have to lead to a plain, convincing and logical conclusion. Where there comes out to be a well-built prima facie case against a person, to refute it, it is not adequate to reject having committed the assumed offence by presenting hazy elucidation and placing the duty on the Bureau to confirm the claim in a more express or sustainable way than with circumstantial evidence.

Wherever a prima facie case has been established, it is wise for the subject of the suggestion to present at least some equally sturdy, but if possible stronger, elements supporting his or her refutation. This is not to articulate that the burden of proof budges to the individual against whom claims have been made. What is significant to understand is that the proof submitted by the Bureau and the subject will be considered on a balance of likelihoods, which calls for a pronouncement of what is further likely to be factual than not factual.

In this case, the Bureau recognized a rational prima facie case that the announcement of loss for a passport was challenging. The factors in the case record fashioned a strong notion that the person who endeavored to use the personality of the subject was enthusiastically supported by the latter.

This doubt was not defied with any significant essentials that would prevail over the sequence of factors which logically recommended that the subject either permitted a third party to make use of the passport he had stated lost or, at minimum, made an announcement of loss for that document that was not convincing. It was hence concluded that the Bureau had convened its burden of proof in ascertaining that the substitute passport issued in the subject’s surname had been acquired by means of fake information.

Conclusion

A Canadian passport is a precious file that must be reserved in a protected place at every time. In Canada, each passport application is established solitary by three distinct federal government agencies. These three country wide agencies which collect passport applications include: Canada Post, Service Canada and Passport Canada (Citizenship and Immigration Canada, 2011). Although passport Canada is regarded as the most straight venue to get hold of a passport, the other two agencies complement these services, mainly in cases where accessing public services has been hard traditionally.

At present, there are six kinds of Canadian passports. According to Vancouver (2009), “these six types of passports include: regular passport, frequent traveler passport, temporary passport, emergency passport, special passport and diplomatic passport. A regular passport is normally issued for travel purposes. It has 24 pages. Its validity period differs with the age or maturity of the passport owner. According to Vancouver (2009), children aged from three to fifteen years and grown up aged from sixteen years and above acquire passports with a validity of up to five years. Children aged below three years acquire passports with a validity of up to three years.

Though passports may look as if they are very official, they may be unauthorized. Passports sold or given out by profit-making sellers are usually illegal and, thus, worthless. Once a passport is announced to be missing, it becomes invalid and thus can not be used for journeys (Department of Justice Canada, 2011).This guarantees that it is not used for illegal functions. However, Passport Canada or the Government of Canada cannot be held accountable for any problems at boundary crossing when one tries to make use of a passport that has been announced missing or stolen.

Finally, simplified revocation procedure, is employed in files that have explicit conditions for denial or revocation and those that have trustworthy information. Such information should be simply verifiable. In such cases the Passport Canada agrees with the claimant or passport owner in script to recommend that his/her request is being rejected or is being revoked. Such a resolution stays in effect up to the time when the client elucidates any erroneous information. The subject should be informed that an appeal to evaluate the decision may be prepared with the adjudicator of Passport Canada.

References

Citizenship and Immigration Canada (2011) Application for a citizenship certificate. Web.

Department of Justice Canada (2011). Canadian Passport Order. Web.

Dobrota, A. & Gloria G. (2006). Ottawa to review help for non-resident citizens. The Globe and Mail 26, 1.

Fong, P. ( 2006). Put an end to citizenship review. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Granatstein, J. L. (2006). Canada’s dual citizenship problem. Web.

Hansen, R. (2006). Citizenship reforms. London: Sage.

Junor, S. & Usher, A. (2004). Access and student finance in Canada. Canada: Canadian Millennium Scholarship Foundation.

Karas, S. (2006). Residency rules for immigrants. Canadian Employment Law Today, 3622-23.

Konrad, V.A. & Nicol, H.N. (2008). Beyond walls: re-inventing the Canada-United States boundaries. New York: Blackwell Publishers.

Ley, D. & Kobayashi, A. (2005). Back to Canada: return migration or transnational sojourn? Global Networks 5 (2), 111-127.

Mallan, C. (1995) Wrong time, wrong place: how two Canadians ended up in Brazilian jail. New York: Key Porter Books.

Mintz, M. (2006). The price of citizenship: dual citizenship in Canada. New York: Oxford University Press.

History of passports (2011). Web.

Renshon, S. (2002). Dual citizens in America: an issue of vast proportions and broad significance. New York: Oxford University Press.

Service Canada (2011). About service Canada. Web.

Skelton, C. (2006). Taiwan strait war would mean evacuation chaos. London: sage.

Vancouver, D. (2009). Canadian citizenship. Web.

Vincent, I. (1995). See no evil: the strange case of Christine Lamont and David Spencer. Canada: Reed Books.

Wagner, J. (2006) History of migration from Germany to Canada 1850-1938. New York: Allan Unwin.

Zhang, K. (2006). Recognizing the Canadian Diaspora. Canada Asia Commentary, 41.

More related papers Related Essay Examples