We will write a custom Essay on Morals and Monopoly: Exploring Changes in the US Policies specifically for you
301 certified writers online
Forces Shaping the DADT Policy
The problem of systematic oppression and marginalization of members of the LGBT community has been in existence in the United States for a significant amount of time, making its way into a range of domains, the military is one of the key areas. Therefore, by lifting the ban on homosexual people being in the military, Barak Obama made a massive breakthrough in the relationships between gay and straight people in American society. When considering the forces behind the change, one must mention the propensity in the society toward building diversity-oriented social justice. The influence of political changes, particularly, the reinforcement of the Liberal Party’s principles, can be considered as the driving force behind the alterations that the U.S. society underwent at the time.
Social Values and the Implementation of Policy Changes
The observed phenomenon owes its existence to the notion defined by Parry (2012) as the “tribal psychology of politics.” Particularly, the propensity among the members of a particular society to follow the principles of justice set and supported by the majority provide the foundation for a massive change in people’s perception of homosexuality, societal taboos, morality, and the role of complying with moral standards.
Additional Examples of Social Values
As the results of a quiz offered by the Moral Foundation (2018) show, most Conservative respondents indicated that they valued morality and compliance with societal standards as high as justice, prevention of harm to others, fairness, and other essential notions that allow providing people with their irrefutable rights (Parry, 2012). Therefore, it can be assumed that the changes in the political landscape of the state served as the basis for enhancing the principles of acceptance within the state (Moral Foundation, 2018). It could be argued that the specified changes were reciprocal and that the results of the elections that allowed Liberals to become the majority were the effect of a shift in social values. Nevertheless, the specified case is a prime example of political factors defining the development of societal relationships.
Monopoly and Government Interventions
When considering the effects of monopoly on the present-day market environment, one must admit that the specified force cannot be described as strictly negative or positive. Instead, it provides a mixed effect that can be used for different purposes, including the encouragement of economic growth.
In addition, one must keep in mind that the modern global market does not contain the specimens of what can be termed as a pure monopoly. The absence thereof can be explained by the rise in product diversity and the increase in opportunities that companies can pursue in the global economy. The resulting emergence of numerous organizations operating in the same niche as corporate giants creates little to no room for absolute monopoly.
However, monopolies also set high-quality standards for the products and services that they deliver. Therefore, opportunities for improving the state economy and promoting active development can be built. The emphasis on the R&D processes and waste management will encourage new entrants in the global market to explore their potential and locate innovative decisions that will make them stay afloat even in the realm of increasingly high competition.
Therefore, introducing tools for governmental regulation of the global market does not seem a sensible idea. Because of the inability to embrace the nuances that guide decision-making processes in the specified environment, governments will fail to create the setting in which organizations will be able to function. Although basic supervision is crucial to ensure the legitimacy of market transactions, rigid control should not be introduced since it will hamper economic growth.
Moral Foundation. (2018). Moral foundations questionnaire. Web.
Parry, M. (2012). Jonathan Haidt decodes the tribal psychology of politics. Chronicle of Higher Education, 58(22), B6.