Optimal Portfolio and Stocks Management Research Paper

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

Introduction

There are ten stocks in the portfolio, including Amazon, Inc., Intel Corporation, Twitter, Inc., Visa, Inc., Nokia Corporation, Ford Motor Company, Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Universal Forest Products, Inc., Tesla, Inc., and MKS Instruments, Inc. The reasons for selecting these stocks are their recent price gains and positive financial news. The stock performance and its volatility of all stocks are provided in the following.

Table 1. Stock Performance and Volatility.

AMZNINTCTWTRVNOKFCHKUFPITSLAMKSIS&P^IRX
Means(0.025)(0.006)0.015(0.017)0.0140.0070.064(0.016)0.003(0.015)(0.006)0.002
Standard deviations0.0810.0630.1480.0440.0900.0660.1990.0970.1180.1020.0350.002

Main body

It is noted that the top performer was Chesapeake Energy Corporation, and the bottom performer was Amazon, Inc. on a monthly return basis. However, Amazon had the highest stock gain of 425.86% over the five years, and Chesapeake Energy Corporation made the most significant stock loss. The highest volatility was recorded in the stock value of Chesapeake Energy Corporation, and the lowest was of Visa, Inc. The S&P 500 index had an average monthly loss of -0.5723% over the last five years (see table 1). Its volatility was 0.03483, which was less than all stocks included in the portfolio that implies that it is well-diversified, and investors will be exposed to lower risk if they have an investment in all 500 stocks.

The correlation matrix between all the stocks over the past five years is provided in the following.

Table 2. Correlation Matrix.

AMZNINTCTWTRVNOKFCHKUFPITSLAMKSI
AMZN1.000
INTC0.2851.000
TWTR0.1820.2031.000
V0.6890.3520.0701.000
NOK0.1390.1010.3080.1511.000
F0.2390.3000.3830.314(0.030)1.000
CHK0.2660.3340.0640.1780.0320.3401.000
UFPI0.3790.3590.0450.386(0.126)0.3780.2661.000
TSLA0.1240.2210.1150.1260.0470.0260.165(0.006)1.000
MKSI0.3160.6500.1060.256(0.032)0.2890.3230.3870.1691.000

Table 2 indicates that the coefficients of correlations between AMZN and V and INTC and MKSI are more than 0.6 (see table 2). It could be due to the close relationship between these companies. There is a significant number of business transactions on Amazon’s e-commerce website, which is paid by users using VISA credit cards. Moreover, Intel, Inc. and MKS Instruments have similar businesses related to products/equipment used by other companies and industries. There are three combinations of companies’ stocks, including CHK/TWTR, CHK/NOK, and TSLA/F, which have small coefficients less than 0.1 (see table 2).

It implies that these companies are entirely unrelated to each other. For example, Tesla and Ford Motor Company are competitors, and their stocks are not correlated. The coefficient of TSLA/UFPI is negative (see table 2), which cannot be explained as both companies are operating in different industries and are not related to each other at all. The covariance matrix is provided in Appendix A. The optimal portfolio is created by determining the lowest value of the portfolio variance. In this case, short-selling is allowed, and the results are provided in the following:

Table 3. Optimal Portfolio.

Portfolio Return-0.0064
Portfolio Variance0.0014
Portfolio Std. Dev.0.0369

The lowest value of portfolio variance is 0.0014, and the expected portfolio return is -0.64% (see table 3). The weight of each stock is provided in the following.

Table 4. Stocks’ Weightage (No Short Sale).

StocksWeights
AMZN0.00000.0%
INTC0.125212.5%
TWTR0.00000.0%
V0.526152.6%
NOK0.122512.3%
F0.172817.3%
CHK0.00000.0%
UFPI0.00000.0%
TSLA0.05335.3%
MKSI0.00000.0%

The highest weight is assigned to Visa, Inc., and no allocation of funds is made to AMZN, TWTR, CHK, UFPI, and MKSI (see table 4). The weight does not seem reasonable as it left out stocks such as AMZN, TWTR, and MKSI, which had significant growth rates recorded over the last five years. I will be reluctant to present this portfolio choice to a client. The minimum variance frontier is given in the following.

Minimum Variance Portfolio.
Figure 1. Minimum Variance Portfolio.

The expected return is nil when the standard deviation is 0.037 (see figure 1). The use of historical information as inputs to portfolio theory is useful in many ways. The historical stock returns are crucial to determine the performance of stocks over a period. It is the primary indicator observed by investors when making their decisions about investing in stocks. The primary objective of an equity investment is to maximize the expected return.

If a firm has poor stock performance in the past, then investors will be reluctant to invest in its stocks. The covariance between stocks assists in determining which stocks to be included in the portfolio. It is a statistical measure used by portfolio theory to lower the overall risk. It is also suggested that stocks that have a negative covariance with each other reduce the portfolio risk. Negative covariance, as it has been noted between TSLA and UFPI, is a good indicator and suitable for developing an efficient portfolio. It can help in creating an efficient portfolio of stocks that can optimize the portfolio return at a low level of risk.

It is stated that the standard deviation is a measure of the systematic risk of investing in an individual stock. Its use by portfolio theory helps in understanding how investors can reduce the degree of investment risk by reviewing the historical data and then choosing stocks that have lesser volatility. The criticism of the Modern Portfolio Theory lies in its use of historical data, which states that it is difficult to select a representative subset of historical data to use. Moreover, there may be certain economic events in the past that could have distorted the trend in the stock return.

If no short sales are allowed, then the optimal portfolio is achieved where the Sharpe Ratio value is the highest (see table 5).

Table 5. No Short Sale Allowed.

Bordered
Port Variance0.0124
Port S.D.0.1115
Port Mean0.0398
Risk-free rate0.00191
Monthly Sharpe Ratio0.3400
Annual Sharpe Ratio1.1777

The weight assigned to each stock is provided below:

Table 6. Stock Weightage.

Weights
AMZN0.00000.00%
INTC0.00000.00%
TWTR0.08648.64%
V0.00000.00%
NOK0.398839.88%
F0.00000.00%
CHK0.514951.49%
UFPI0.00000.00%
TSLA0.00000.00%
MKSI0.00000.00%

When this is compared with the previous optimal portfolio, it is noted that the allocation to INTC, TSLA, and F is reduced to zero. On the other hand, funds are allocated to stocks, including TWTR, CHK, and V, which had zero allocation in the previous portfolio. Furthermore, investment in NOK is increased, and still, no allocation is made to AMZN (See table 6).

I decided not to invest in Nokia because of its misleading advertising case reported in 2012 as it attempted to deceive its customers by using false imagery in its advertisements. Furthermore, I excluded Chesapeake Energy Corporation as it was involved in a land price manipulation case. The following optimal portfolio was achieved without these two stocks.

Table 7. Green Listing.

Port Variance0.0061
Port S.D.0.0784
Port Mean0.0102
Risk-free rate0.00191
Monthly Sharpe Ratio0.1054
Annual Sharpe Ratio0.3650

Conclusion

In this case, the Sharpe Ratio is 0.3650 (annualized) (see table 7), as compared to 1.1777. It implies that this portfolio is more efficient than the previous one. Moreover, the weight assigned to each stock is given below.

Table 8. Stock Weightage (Green Listing).

Weights
AMZN0.00000.0%
INTC0.00000.0%
TWTR0.358735.9%
V0.00000.0%
NOK0.00000.0%
F0.628662.9%
CHK0.00000.0%
UFPI0.00000.0%
TSLA0.01271.3%
MKSI0.00000.0%

The cost of the above portfolio is determined by using the current price of these stocks along with their allocation (see table 8).

Table 8. Portfolio Cost.

Aug-0825-Oct
WeightAllocationPriceSharesPriceValue
TWTR0.35935,870,000.042.07852,62630.1025,664,059.9
F0.62962,860,000.09.416,680,1278.7058,117,109.5
TSLA0.0131,270,000.0238.305,329313.641,671,518.3
TOTAL FUNDS100,000,000.085,452,687.61

It is noted that the value of the portfolio has reduced from August 8, 2019, to October 25, 2019 (see table 8).

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2021, July 5). Optimal Portfolio and Stocks Management. https://ivypanda.com/essays/optimal-portfolio-and-stocks-management/

Work Cited

"Optimal Portfolio and Stocks Management." IvyPanda, 5 July 2021, ivypanda.com/essays/optimal-portfolio-and-stocks-management/.

References

IvyPanda. (2021) 'Optimal Portfolio and Stocks Management'. 5 July.

References

IvyPanda. 2021. "Optimal Portfolio and Stocks Management." July 5, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/optimal-portfolio-and-stocks-management/.

1. IvyPanda. "Optimal Portfolio and Stocks Management." July 5, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/optimal-portfolio-and-stocks-management/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Optimal Portfolio and Stocks Management." July 5, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/optimal-portfolio-and-stocks-management/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
Privacy Settings

IvyPanda uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance your experience, enabling functionalities such as:

  • Basic site functions
  • Ensuring secure, safe transactions
  • Secure account login
  • Remembering account, browser, and regional preferences
  • Remembering privacy and security settings
  • Analyzing site traffic and usage
  • Personalized search, content, and recommendations
  • Displaying relevant, targeted ads on and off IvyPanda

Please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy for detailed information.

Required Cookies & Technologies
Always active

Certain technologies we use are essential for critical functions such as security and site integrity, account authentication, security and privacy preferences, internal site usage and maintenance data, and ensuring the site operates correctly for browsing and transactions.

Site Customization

Cookies and similar technologies are used to enhance your experience by:

  • Remembering general and regional preferences
  • Personalizing content, search, recommendations, and offers

Some functions, such as personalized recommendations, account preferences, or localization, may not work correctly without these technologies. For more details, please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy.

Personalized Advertising

To enable personalized advertising (such as interest-based ads), we may share your data with our marketing and advertising partners using cookies and other technologies. These partners may have their own information collected about you. Turning off the personalized advertising setting won't stop you from seeing IvyPanda ads, but it may make the ads you see less relevant or more repetitive.

Personalized advertising may be considered a "sale" or "sharing" of the information under California and other state privacy laws, and you may have the right to opt out. Turning off personalized advertising allows you to exercise your right to opt out. Learn more in IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy.

1 / 1