In his work Politics and the English Language, Orwell reflects on the language and the implications of its use. There are certain associations with specific words that have manifested in society due to the influence of the phenomena related to these words provided. I agree with him on that matter because it is clear that the impact some events make pertains to the national and global level, shaping public opinion on both them and related matters. However, the conception of maximum simplification of language was slightly confusing to me. I can see that abstract words are usually not understood by the majority of the population; however, I do not think that simple language would solve that particular problem. It is often the complex nature of some concepts that are discussed than the language that people lack understanding of, in my opinion.
I think that Orwell’s rhetoric was quite effective for his age, but today, the context of society and politics have changed. In his writing Politics and the English Language, he states that not only many abstract words have become incomprehensible to the average person, but that they have lost the concreteness of understanding for everyone. Perhaps it was a standing issue during his time period, but nowadays, with the increasing globalization process and diversity. I think that people started to understand each other in general and the politicians specifically even more.
Still, in his rhetoric, Orwell made a very important remark, from understanding the problematic nature of which we are moving away to this day. He states that some words are chosen as the most important in generating both sharply positive texts and sharply negative ones. Therefore, for example, mass media are not particularly interested in the concreteness of their messages; they are interested in the effectiveness of these words. I fully agree with that statement, and I think it is especially effective today when the opinions of the people are largely manipulated by the media.