Pornography’s Harm as a Feminist Fallacy Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda®
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment

Introduction

The argument of feminists regarding the harmful status of pornography has no statistical significance hence no basis for college-level discussions. Having read pornographic magazines, I do not see their harm. Feminists criticize the porn content but should minimize the case as they consume it too. Scientific studies have not proved that explicit photography is harmful. If pornography had massive harm, it would affect the consumers and people involved in production (Sanderson 82).

An argument refers to a collection of statements stating facts and giving reasons for their beliefs. It is an attempt by people to try and convince others of a certain concept. Fallacies refer to mistakes made in an argument that persuades the listeners to believe in the statements. These fallacies will now be discussed in the following essay. A fallacy is a deductive argument because the arguer is guaranteeing a truth with the conclusion by providing premises that speak the truth. In the argument, feminists conclude that revealing photography is harmful to humans (Sanderson 82).

Argument

P1. How is pornography harmful to humans, despite the role, they take on it, be it watching or participating in producing the scenes?

Conclusion

The involved magazine should address the issue and set the record straight.

The feminists were arguing in the exact manner that has been represented above. The fallacy presented the same single argument.

It has already been established that these arguments are deductive in nature. However, they lack sufficient proof to be true. Pornographic magazines have been in supply for years and there has not been much-reported harm associated with them. In fact, I have read them, and I have not endured any harm either physically or emotionally. In addition, scientific studies have concluded that pornography is not harmful to humans in any way (Sanderson 82).

However, taking a closer look at this argument, its strength can be described as weak. The lack of scientific proof to support this statement weakens the argument. For something to be termed as true, there needs to be evidence. In this scenario, scientific research has proven the argument not to be true (Baumeister and Kathleen 98).

The fallacy affects the strength of the argument in that it makes it questionable. The argument is only based on word of mouth and opinion, hence the validity of the argument is not believable. Convincing listeners without sufficient proof could be challenging and attacks by feminists majorly lead to weaker societal bonds associated with issues like divorce (Baumeister and Kathleen 99). It shows the feminists put the blame on pornography whereas the problem does not lie there.

Research indicates that when men attempt to watch these videos, it is mainly because they are lacking a form of satisfaction that they should be receiving in their homes. However, the feminists overlook this fact and place the blame on the multi-billion dollar industry. If only they change their opinion on the matter, then relationships in society would begin to improve and lower the rate of divorces that take place. The argument that pornography is harmful to people is the fallacy that is committed to this argument (Baumeister and Kathleen 105). It is so because the whole argument revolves around the idea that human beings are being hurt. It is weakened by the fact that people are not forced to watch the video.

Works Cited

Baumeister, Roy F, and Kathleen D. Vohs. Encyclopedia of Social Psychology. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications, 2007. Print.

Sanderson, Catherine A. Social Psychology. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley, 2010. Print.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2022, January 24). Pornography's Harm as a Feminist Fallacy. https://ivypanda.com/essays/pornographys-harm-as-a-feminist-fallacy/

Work Cited

"Pornography's Harm as a Feminist Fallacy." IvyPanda, 24 Jan. 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/pornographys-harm-as-a-feminist-fallacy/.

References

IvyPanda. (2022) 'Pornography's Harm as a Feminist Fallacy'. 24 January.

References

IvyPanda. 2022. "Pornography's Harm as a Feminist Fallacy." January 24, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/pornographys-harm-as-a-feminist-fallacy/.

1. IvyPanda. "Pornography's Harm as a Feminist Fallacy." January 24, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/pornographys-harm-as-a-feminist-fallacy/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Pornography's Harm as a Feminist Fallacy." January 24, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/pornographys-harm-as-a-feminist-fallacy/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
Privacy Settings

IvyPanda uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance your experience, enabling functionalities such as:

  • Basic site functions
  • Ensuring secure, safe transactions
  • Secure account login
  • Remembering account, browser, and regional preferences
  • Remembering privacy and security settings
  • Analyzing site traffic and usage
  • Personalized search, content, and recommendations
  • Displaying relevant, targeted ads on and off IvyPanda

Please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy for detailed information.

Required Cookies & Technologies
Always active

Certain technologies we use are essential for critical functions such as security and site integrity, account authentication, security and privacy preferences, internal site usage and maintenance data, and ensuring the site operates correctly for browsing and transactions.

Site Customization

Cookies and similar technologies are used to enhance your experience by:

  • Remembering general and regional preferences
  • Personalizing content, search, recommendations, and offers

Some functions, such as personalized recommendations, account preferences, or localization, may not work correctly without these technologies. For more details, please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy.

Personalized Advertising

To enable personalized advertising (such as interest-based ads), we may share your data with our marketing and advertising partners using cookies and other technologies. These partners may have their own information collected about you. Turning off the personalized advertising setting won't stop you from seeing IvyPanda ads, but it may make the ads you see less relevant or more repetitive.

Personalized advertising may be considered a "sale" or "sharing" of the information under California and other state privacy laws, and you may have the right to opt out. Turning off personalized advertising allows you to exercise your right to opt out. Learn more in IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy.

1 / 1