If you were President Ford would you have impeached or pardoned Nixon?
From Watergate’s incident, President Nixon deserved impeachment having attempted to cover-up the 1972’s political break-in at the DNC’s headquarter. In personal opinion, President Ford could have not pardoned Nixon following his unlawful deeds. As the then president of the US mandated to embraced justice, democracy, and integrity, Nixon deserved a thorough conviction having failed to satisfy these virtues. It was clear (as investigated by FBI) that Nixon and his administration were the principal schemers of the criminal incidences witnessed at the NDC headquarter indicated earlier (Bottom 1). This is a critical provision when considered critically.
Additionally, his attempts to cover-up the incident based on his authority as the then-sitting president were unlawful and impractical. For that matter, it is crucial to argue that President Nixon could have been impeached due to his illegal deeds and the misuse of the presidential office. Elections should be free and fair; nonetheless, the scheme (steered by Nixon’s administration) violated such principles. This indicates why such incidences should be charged before the court of law to establish, ratify, and embrace justice within the country.
Whether what he did was serious
It is crucial to agree that what President Richard Nixon did was serious when regarded in the democratic, political, and legal realms. The fact that the incident was political indicated how he wanted to rig his reelection to the white house for another term. This was politically incongruent with what was expected of a topmost leader. Additionally, the tape records grasped in his office indicated clearly how he was involved in the act (ICSI 1).
It is vital to claim that Nixon’s administration did not embrace democracy as demonstrated on various occasions. The fact that he attempted to cover-up the incident was a serious occurrence in his administration. He could have allowed for flawless investigations to occur on the matter rather than taking sides. Additionally, the fact that he indulged in illegal raids and attempted to cover-up the entire incident was serious in various contexts.
Would you have resigned if you were Nixon?
Due to the nature of the incidence, relevant investigations executed by FBI, and subsequent court orders, I could have also resigned if I were President Nixon. This was to reduce the anxiety and mistrust that Americans had started bestowing on Nixon’s administration. The pressure concerning the matter was uncontainable and the situation could have worsened in case Nixon failed to resign (NationalGeographic 1). This move was necessary to restore normalcy within the country. Additionally, it could have been hard to win the election due to the negative impacts fronted by the incident. Similarly, the fact that some of Nixon’s administrators had been vindicated worsened the situation. This shows why it was vital to resign from the docket of the presidency to allow for just and reasonable investigations to occur on the matter.
What do you think of President Nixon?
President Nixon wanted to manipulate his way back to the statehouse by disabling democrats in the political realms. This indicates the aspects of secrecy, selfishness, injustice, prejudice, and inequality embraced by Nixon in his previous presidential bids. Conversely, Nixon cooperated with the law, political dynamics, and loved the nation (US) more than his interests. This is evident by his presidential resignation and being the first American president to do so.
Works Cited
Bottom, Foggy. Watergate. 2012. Web.
ICSI. Watergate Scandal Summary. Web.
NationalGeographic. Watergate. 2012. Web.