Precis
The article by Sukamolson (2007) analyzes the different quantitative methods with a view of guiding scholars. During research, identifying the correct methodology to apply is essential in achieving better results. The study enhances the understanding of quantitative methods by introducing examples of methods scholars can use. It is important to know when to use different research methods. The author indicates that the research targets novice researchers who may not be able to distinguish between the right methods to apply. The paper analyzes the assumptions underlying the use of quantitative research and misconceptions that exist.
Based on the examination of different methods, the authors conclude that scholars use them when looking for breadth and when testing a hypothesis. The divide between subjectivist and realist ideologies is not clearly defined because researchers tend to use both strategies depending on the data. The synopsis provided by the author can be crucial in assisting other individuals during their research.
Summary of Steps Leading to Conclusion
Interest in quantitative methods is minimal because most people tend to prefer qualitative procedures. This is because qualitative measures are essential when searching for meaning and depth. The article provides information on the misconceptions and various assumptions involving quantitative research. The paper also provides the advantages and disadvantages of various methodologies. Due to the lack of studies that review quantitative methods, there has been a need for more scholarly work that addresses the gap. This analysis aims to bridge that gap by enhancing knowledge on different quantitative strategies. The work debunks the divide that exists between quantitative and qualitative methods. In doing so, the author champions the use of a mixed-methods approach.
The researcher argues that quantitative procedures are essential when investigating the breadth of a concept and testing a hypothesis. Data can be transformed from non-quantitative forms to quantitative forms through the use of measurement tools (Sukamolson, 2007). Scholars have to determine the procedure to use based on the data they possess. The conclusion provided by the author summarizes the misconceptions and assumptions presented in the main body. The conclusion states the main purpose of the paper and the need for carrying out the review. The major arguments presented by the author are briefly indicated.
Critical Evaluation
The article presents information that has already been provided by other researchers. This means that the paper does not contribute to the advancement of knowledge on quantitative methods. However, the paper is useful for novice researchers as it can assist them to understand the different procedures and their advantages. Another essential aspect is that the author provides a checklist that individuals can use when evaluating quantitative research proposals. This criterion is crucial as it can be used by researchers and academic institutions. The author provides different quantitative methods and their advantages and disadvantages.
The study does not follow the normal research article format. The paper only provides a synopsis of quantitative methods based on secondary sources. The author indicates the references used in creating the scholarly work. The writer has structured the paper in a way that enables the reader to follow from start to finish. The researcher fails to provide a substantive conclusion by not providing the synopsis of major arguments. The analysis is dependent on secondary data which limits the usefulness of the information. However, the paper provides a deep evaluation of different quantitative methods which can be helpful to novice researchers.
Reference
Sukamolson, S. (2007). Fundamentals of quantitative research. Language Institute Chulalongkorn University, 1(3), 1-20. Web.