Introduction
Salafism believes that the most principal and genuine type of Islam might originate in the existence of the initial, honorable ages of Muslims known as the Salaf, who lived near the Prophet Muhammad in both time and vicinity. Salafis strive to live independently of the secular world and Western cultural influences. They also oppose other Muslims’ beliefs, particularly Sufis and Shiites. They emphasize pure monotheism and counter behaviors like honoring Muslim prophets and leaders (Hardy, 2018). With late attacks and political ways of talking encompassing Islam and Muslims developing more hot, troublesome, and messy, explaining peoples’ terminology has become progressively crucial. All too often, the terms “Islamism,” “Salafism,” and “jihadism” are persecuted and grouped. Though we know that this list is not complete, here is a quick guide to the differences between three contemporary and, in some cases confounding Islamic gatherings that right now rule people’s titles and will proceed to do so for some time (Sabic-El-Rayess, 2021). Hence, this paper aims to find out through critical evaluation the full extent of Salafist ideology’s role in radicalizing young British women and men into violent extremism.
Religious Adherence, Duty and Observation, and Paradox of Radicalization
The current surge in political and social concerns calls for attention to the issue of good and bad religion. Recently there has been a development of the dichotomous categorization that has sought to place faith as extreme or moderate and good or bad. This categorization follows the presence of divergent beliefs and notions that emanate from members of a particular religious group. These individuals host the characteristics of adherence whereby they struggle to follow the ways stipulated by their religions. For Islam, some individuals believe they must mend the political system that most people agree with that their faith proposes, resulting in terrorism (Sharipova and Beissembayev, 2021). By scrutinizing most religions, peace is the ultimate goal they aspire to achieve. However, for the Muslims and the Salafis, reforming the political systems is the absolute objective leading to a paradox that the religion’s beliefs can indirectly justify.
Islamism and Salafist Ideology
Ideologies serve numerous purposes, and the first is to create awareness within a specific set of people that a particular subject merits their attention. Ideologies explain why social, political, and economic conditions are similar to that “in-group.” Third, ideologies are particularly alluring when people feel in a predicament because they seek explanations in times of crisis. Fourth, ideologies are connections between ideas, beliefs, and myths on the one hand and action on the other (Sharipova and Beissembayev, 2021). Finally, they can be preservation instruments to help a group maintain its political influence. The Salafi-jihad doctrine shares many similarities with radical leftist ideologies in the twentieth-century UK (Sas et al., 2020). The Salafi-jihad, like the extreme left, views its actions as a revolution against injustice, rejecting bourgeois principles, imperialism, and materialism. Both socialist movements and Salafi-jihadists have the same goal: to help bring about a more just society, with violence considered an acceptable means (Darden, 2019). Both Salafi-jihadists and extreme leftist revolutionaries think their operations’ scope, relevance, and goals are global.
Islamism, as a peculiarity, incorporates an immense scope of convictions and ways of behaving. Islamist associations accept that Islamic regulation or standards ought to assume a critical part in open life in the broadest sense. They receive that Islam remarks on how governmental issues ought to be run, how the law should be carried out, and how others, not simply themselves, ought to act ethically. Being or turning into an Islamist, then again, is a conscious demonstration of political confirmation. Modern liberal sensibilities are wary of assigning special status to any religion for fear of restricting individual liberty. Although the two might seem similar, a significant difference exists. Today, Salafis are noted in the Arab world for seeking to mimic the first Muslims’ traditions, such as dressing like the Prophet (Hassan et al., 2018). Salafists are less likely than mainstream Islamists to engage in active political activism instead of picking a “quietist” strategy for teaching Islamic educating and keeping away from a showdown with state specialists. Some Salafis have engaged in discretionary legislative issues and, surprisingly, made ideological groups.
Salafist philosophy is founded based on Salafism an ambiguous term used to describe various Muslim-based religious movements throughout the years. To comprehend Salafism’s involvement in the radicalization of Muslim communities and how this process plays out in the UK, one must initially investigate its qualities as a development in the Arab world. Salafism, in contrast to other conventional associations, needs various leveled frameworks. Salafis have a scattered and separated network structure. The different gatherings are driven by sheiks or researchers who have multiple ability levels in hadith science yet are not necessarily related to one another (Parsons, 2021). Young people typically recommend the most prominent scholars to others because of their extensive knowledge of religious matters. The Salafi community recognizes only an informal hierarchy based on the reputation of the many sheiks. There is no world-class or characterized authority because of the wealth of sheiks (Llorent-Bedmar et al., 2020). This decentralized cell structure makes sense of how simple it has been in the UK to shape gatherings or independent cells anxious to explode themselves without the requirement for direct orders from a more significant position.
The current definition of Salafism is vague and perplexing. This ambiguity is revealed at the point when numerous Salafis are uncertain of what Salafism incorporates, guaranteeing that it just means following the Qur’an and Sunna – a tricky depiction since it infers that different Muslims don’t. Besides, in light of the term’s dubiousness (Falkheimer, 2022). All Muslims guarantee Salafism in its broadest sense, in which the general Islamic ideal is to look like the Prophet and the early devout Muslim society. Each Muslim is a Salafi because they are committed to following the Prophet and his Companions in rehearsing Islam since the term Salafism suggests genuineness and legitimacy. It is excellent to realize that Salafis come in all shapes and sizes, from moderate to obsessive, from quietist to political lobbyist to jihadist or brutality situated (Speckhard and Shajkovci, 2018). While most Salafis settle on standards of Aqidah (religious philosophy), they differ on the statute and legislative issues.
Salafist and Radicalization to Extremism
Following the Islamist fear episodes in Manchester and an influx of illegal intimidation across the mainland UK, the danger level in the United Kingdom stays severe; it is very prone to infer that more assaults. Since 2015, the national counter-terrorism policy has emphasized the role of nonviolent Islamist extremism and extremist ideology in eventually pushing some people to commit acts of violence (Tahir, 2022). The radicalization process is widely seen as an exceptionally complicated one that differs from one individual to another. It is often felt that a mix of conditions can push or draw an individual toward or away from a vicious radical gathering. Such factors might add to a singular’s weakness in outrageous discourse. All models are instances of estrangement from society, the draw of the reason, a change in collective vibes, financial difficulty, and saw treacheries, like the system’s outrages.
The current world has digitalized following the eruption of the internet era. However, only 85% of homes in the United Kingdom have an internet connection. Opportunities for people desiring to use the internet for terrorism have expanded as society embraces it more (Larsson and Mattsson, 2022). Terrorists and extremists can connect, collaborate, and persuade through the internet. Lately, UK policymakers, professionals, and scholastics have started to examine what the web means for the radicalization interaction: how an individual comes to help with psychological warfare and related extremism. As a result, various Islamic institutions in the United Kingdom have advocated Islamist extremism while getting funds from outside the country. Although the issue of foreign-funded extremism gained increased public attention over a decade ago, it has since faded from the political agenda (Djorić, 2021). Nonetheless, the evidence suggests that foreign-funded and inspired Islamist extremism remains a substantial problem in the United Kingdom and that several countries continue to sponsor this ideology globally.
Numerous psychological militant gatherings depend on youngsters for help, with obligations going from gourmet experts to equipped warriors. Notwithstanding, the strategies used to enroll youngsters incredibly vary. Youthful people are frequently deceived, dealt with, captured, or coercively enlisted into fearmonger associations. Others join militant psychological associations deliberately due to the engaging quality of a gathering-based personality, impression of rejection, complaints, social risks, and monetary dependability. The opportunity for popularity, magnificence, and individual ties, such as family and kinship organizations, is essential. An assortment of elements can impact youth’s weakness to be psychological oppressor selecting, including geographic vicinity to a fearmonger bunch, friendly or political minimization perspectives, openness to lenient informal organizations, and openness to fanatic misleading publicity. Be that as it may, the corresponding significance of these attributes shifts by individual and by the topographical situation (Suljić and Wilner, 2021). Fear monger bunches regularly utilize both male and female youth in help, enrollment, and battle jobs; notwithstanding, male aggressors represent a lot larger number of adolescent warriors. Philosophy frequently restricts the jobs open to young ladies in Salafi-jihadist bunches like ISIS and al Shabab, like life partners and mothers.
A discriminatory classical of freedom for affluent white women at the cost of minority women sets,” according to Western feminism. It gives women agency based on Islamic beliefs, emphasizing that men’s and women’s responsibilities are complementary and cooperative rather than competitive (Mohammadi, 2021). Women signed an unofficial manifesto. The duties assigned to every orientation in the West relate to shallow and materialistic standards that have wandered from the jobs planned by God. However, there are some markers of female radicalization that can be discovered. While these indications may indicate radicalization, they do not have to lead to radicalization, nor can they be regarded as requirements for radicalization. Nonetheless, the following symptoms have been observed in women who traveled to Syria and Iraq or attempted to do so.
For propagation of the Salafi principles, the movement employs a variety of informal network channels, including personal interaction, mosque activities, seminars, and lectures. Religious classes provided in mosques were once the primary means of mobilization. Classes have been transferred to private houses, where surveillance is considerably more difficult due to tighter police controls and repression. Salafi views are also widely disseminated through publications. Scholars are prolific publishers, with their works extensively distributed throughout the Muslim world (Rane and Bull, 2019). In addition, Salafi scholars’ lessons and sermons can be reproduced via tape recordings and the internet, linking listeners in time and location and bringing the community closer together.
Since the unexpected appearance of the web during the 1990s, the alleged data upheaval has most certainly filled in cultural pertinence. Psychological oppressors and fanatics have a similar capacity and admittance to the web as the remainder of society: to convey, team up and convince. There is much extremist writing accessible on the web, and the number is increasing consistently (Hoffman, 2020). Accordingly, the web’s threatening potential has turned into a primary concern for lawmakers, and the way public safety chances are researched has been modified. States are becoming progressively aware of the web’s part in radicalization.
Prevention of the Salafist Ideology Radicalization
With the increase in young people being radicalized, it has called for various measures to be formulated to counter the different effects experienced in British society. Our current understanding should inform the methods for countering and preventing teenage involvement in terrorism of how young people join violent extremist groups (Muthuswamy, 2018). Terrorist or forceful extremist recruitment is extremely difficult. Numerous youthful people are convinced to participate by strong relatives or because they accept it will assist them with guarding their families or towns. Others are misdirected, handled, seized, or enrolled despite their desire to the contrary. Kidnappings or open brutality are typical ways for youngsters to be coerced into service. More moderate Muslim organizations in the UK, such as Sufis, have seen a tendency of its young people to gravitate toward Salafism in recent years and have partly linked this to the impact of Saudi-funded mosques and literature (Darden, 2019). The damage has been extremely severe in some communities. They are positively oriented to Salafi ideology due to such connections and their religiousness, a situation that does not occur outside of Islamist movements.
The UK administration has the chance to usher in a new era of counter-terrorism policies. It has made a good start by pledging to “restore individual rights in the face of increasing state power,” which includes the adoption of a “Freedom Bill,” also a survey of counter-psychological warfare regulations (Vergani et al., 2020). Forestalling illegal intimidation before it happens is an essential part of the counter-psychological warfare exertion, especially considering the domestic threat by focusing on individuals who intend to perform criminal activities rather than the current comprehensive approach to prevention, which targets all Muslims (De Bruyn, 2021). Broader cohesiveness initiatives are necessary, but they ought not to be sought after straightforwardly or from the perspective of safety. Big Society exercises can assist with building a more brought together society and, by implication, address some of society’s problems, including preventing the radicalization of young people into violent extremism.
In the social sciences, systematic reviews have recently been used to assess the usefulness of a particular intervention in addressing a social problem. For example, cognitive behavioral therapy or ‘alternative options for reducing young gang involvement have been implemented to address youth radicalization (Falkheimer, 2022). OnOn the other hand, this type of meta-analysis is most useful when addressing a specific subject. As a result of this growth, there is a growing need to understand why and how young people adopt ideological solid or religious ideas and sometimes conduct acts of violence (Matveeva, 2018). The conditions in which young people should and should be socialized as democratic citizens are not debatable. This process occurs by figuring out the techniques and numerous drivers of radicalization, especially those connected with strict radicalization (Wilson, 2017). It is fundamental for forestalling radicalization in Western Muslim diasporas (Kasehage, 2020). Strict fundamentalists are believed to be mental radicals, with just a little rate liable to become assailant fanatics.
Conventional ways to countering vicious radicalism (CVE) made inside law enforcement systems have been criticized. The arising practice is regularly not proof-based and ailing in portrayal and assessment. Universal solutions aimed at a larger audience should be examined (Bouzar and Bénézech, 2019). These aims are to limit the number of new people who adopt extremist ideas, what are more savage inclinations, perceive the fundamental social, social, and lawful determinants of wellbeing, and work with individual, family, and local area resources (Brown, 2019). While a large part of the ebb and flow research centers around teenagers, there is a rising contention for prior mediations that forestall misfortune, advance sound social and profound turn of events and cultivate flexibility (Carlsson et al., 2020). Individuals might benefit from some intervention to become sound and proactive members in networks that advance resistance and variety and reject fierce philosophies by lessening social disparities such as an open pay and tending to necessities.
A growing body of research for treating and preventing violent extremism focuses on building protective elements. For example, critical thinking or thinking abilities and examining ideas like individual character, and having a place with assistance make individuals versatile (Idris, 2018). Although there is proof that universal medicines can work on psychological wellbeing and prosperity in the near term, further examination is expected to determine the effect of these mediations on different segment gatherings and violent extremism (Höffler et al., 2022). Höffler et al.’s evidence support the importance of programs that promote peace and diversity by raising multicultural awareness, advocating pluralistic principles, and promoting human rights (2022). Consequently, when it comes to determining the best ways to boost prevention efforts, different perspectives on radicalization become important (Chua et al., 2020). When the beginning points for a phenomenon diverge, efforts to accomplish common goals are likely hampered (Wiktorowicz, 2006). As a result, we should abandon the notion that radicalization is a single cause that applies to all “radicals” (Ramakrishna, 2018). Living in a complex world necessitates the capacity to react quickly.
Conclusion
As additional examples of radicalization emerged, many people in the United Kingdom were affected. Law enforcement agencies are confronted with new obstacles in countering terrorism, as there has never been such a volume and quality of radicalization before. It creates an even more enormous difficulty for policymakers in the United Kingdom. While the global war on terror appears to be succeeding in conventional combat, it fails to prevent radicalization. Numerous fundamentalist associations and dread gatherings follow the Salafi philosophy as their essential perspective. The Salafi understanding of Islamic disclosure and its convictions brings about radicalism. Regardless of the wealth of studies and writing on strict radicalization, few seem, by all accounts, to be helping to comprehend radical inclinations and indoctrination of UK young by Salafi speech. Salafi mosques and religious institutes emerge throughout the UK due to this global logistical support.
Reference List
Bouzar, D. and Bénézech, M., 2019. Practical Guide of Assessment of Disengagement from Jihadist Violent Extremism. Journal of Current Medical Research and Opinion, 2(10), pp.256-284.
Brown, K.E., 2019. Gender, governance, and countering violent extremism (CVE) in the UK. International Journal of Law, Crime, and Justice, p.100371.
Carlsson, C., Rostami, A., Mondani, H., Sturup, J., Sarnecki, J. and Edling, C., 2020. A life-course analysis of engagement in violent extremist groups. The British Journal of Criminology, 60(1), pp.74-92.
Chua, S., Joma, G., Lishchenko, A., Lobo, J., Mejia, L., and Taylor, M., 2020. Responding to Violent Extremism in the Western Balkans.
Darden, J.T., 2019. Tackling terrorists’ exploitation of youth. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
De Bruyn, P.C., 2021. Evidence to Explain Violent Extremist Communication. Perspectives on terrorism, 15(4), pp.76-110.
Djorić, M., 2021. The Attitudes of Roma Women on Violent Extremism and Radicalization in Serbia: A Preliminary Study. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 27(2), pp.213-225.
Falkheimer, J., 2022. Strategies to Counter Extremism and Radicalisation in Swedish Schools–Managing Salafi Jihadists Attempts to Influence Students. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 26(1), pp.67-86.
Hardy, K., 2018. Comparing theories of radicalization with countering violent extremism policy.
Hassan, G., Brouillette-Alarie, S., Alava, S., 2018. Exposure to extremist online content could lead to violent radicalization: A systematic review of empirical evidence. International journal of developmental science, 12(1-2), pp.71-88.
Höffler, K., Meyer, M. and Möller, V., 2022. Risk Assessment—the Key to More Security? Factors, Tools, and Practices in Dealing with Extremist Individuals. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, pp.1-27.
Hoffman, B., Ware, J. and Shapiro, E., 2020. Assessing the threat of incel violence. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 43(7), pp.565-587.
Idris, I., 2018. Youth vulnerability to violent extremist groups in the Indo-Pacific. GSDRC. Web.
Larsson, G. and Mattsson, C., 2022. Social Work as a Tool for Countering Violent Extremism in Sweden. Radicalization, Extremism and Social Work Practice: Minority Muslim Youth in the West.
Llorent-Bedmar, V., Palma, V.C.C.D. and Navarro-Granados, M., 2020. Islamic religion teacher training in Spain: Implications for preventing Islamic-inspired violent radicalism. Teaching and Teacher Education, 95, p.103138.
Matveeva, A., 2018. Radicalization and Violent Extremism in Kyrgyzstan: On the Way to the Caliphate? The RUSI Journal, 163(1), pp.30-46.
Mohammadi, M., 2021. The Role of Education in Combating Violent Extremism in Developing Countries with an Emphasis on Afghanistan. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 9(3), 273-287.
Muthuswamy, M.S., 2018. A conceptual framework of Salafi radicalization: An underlying theme and its enablers. Available at SSRN 3131606.
Parsons, T., 2021. Police Responses to Islamist Radicalisation and Violent Extremism. In Policing in an Age of Reform (pp. 101-115). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Ramakrishna, K., 2018. The radicalization of Abu Hamdie: more comprehensive lessons for the ongoing struggle against violent extremism in post-Marawi Mindanao. Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, 5(2), pp.111-128.
Rane, H. and Bull, M., 2019. Islamism, Radicalisation and Violent Extremism: Perspectives of Young Muslim Australians. In Contesting the Theological Foundations of Islamism and Violent Extremism (pp. 115-135). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Sabic-El-Rayess, A., 2021. How do people radicalize? International Journal of Educational Development, 87, p.102499.
Sas, M., Ponnet, K., Reniers, G. and Hardyns, W., 2020. The role of education in preventing radicalization and violent extremism in developing countries. Sustainability, 12(6), p.2320.
Sharipova, D. and Beissembayev, S., 2021. Causes of Violent Extremism in Central Asia: The Case of Kazakhstan. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, pp.1-21.
Speckhard, A. and Shajkovci, A., 2018. The Balkan jihad: Recruitment to violent extremism and issues facing returning foreign fighters in Kosovo and Southern Serbia. Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 101(2), 79-109.
Suljić, D. and Wilner, A., 2021. From Conversion to Violent Extremism: Empirical Analysis of Three Canadian Muslim Converts to Islam. Journal for Deradicalization, (26), pp.110-151.
Tahir, H., 2022. Radicalization and Violent Extremism among Norwegian Youth. Radicalization, Extremism and Social Work Practice: Minority Muslim Youth in the West.
Vergani, M., Iqbal, M., Ilbahar, E. and Barton, G., 2020. The three Ps of radicalization: Push, pull, and personal. A systematic scoping review of the scientific evidence about radicalization into violent extremism. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 43(10), pp.854-854.
Wiktorowicz, Q. 2006. Anatomy of the Salafi Movement, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 29:3, 207-239. Web.
Wilson, T. 2017. Foreign-Funded-Islamist-Extremism-final. Islam Studies.