Abortion Policy Analysis
The introduction of regulation and informed consent measures in the case of abortion policies is feasible from the perspective of eliminating health risks for the population. Hence, the specific merits of these solutions should be taken into account to shed light on the effects of these practices. The consideration of this subject from legal and biblical perspectives is, therefore, crucial for demonstrating the way they work.
The advantages of the mentioned decisions, accompanying the official political course in this respect, are numerous; however, for the purposes of this paper, only several ideas are selected. As follows from the article published by Guttmacher’s Institute (2020), the common practices include adhering to ethics by organizations, increasing people’s awareness regarding the interventions, and educating the population about consequences for mental health. The benefits of a proper facilities’ approach are the presence of uniform measures when informed consent is obtained and the guarantee of free will, which are a critical complement to the healthcare system. In the case of spreading information, they ensure an optimal decision-making process and the availability of options explained to women. As for mental health, they are the attention to this aspect which is frequently neglected and the possibility of conducting careful analysis.
Thus, the merits of the chosen regulation/informed consent measures affect the suitability of interventions in each individual case. For instance, in terms of legal reasoning, the abortion policies after introducing the ethics are less harmful compared to when personal circumstances are ignored. In addition, from the biblical standpoint, this solution is crucial for elaborating standard procedures within medical facilities with respect to transparency of provided information and its high quality for patients’ awareness.
Objective Versus Opinion Writing
In the case of abortion policies, the examination of issues attributed to the non-compliance of these legal instruments with the actual population needs is thoroughly discussed by scholars and bloggers interested in the topic. However, there is a number of apparent differences in their approaches to the problem, and they should also be considered to form informed opinions among the affected persons. It means that opinion writing and objective, analytical writing about this area should be distinguished by the tools they adopt and the solutions they provide.
The main characteristic crucial for this purpose is the reliance on varying databases and their processing. In scholarly journal articles, they are primarily first-hand sources and credible studies suitable for making conclusions on the subject (Upadhyaya et al. 2021; Brown et al. 2020). In contrast, blog posts and similar publications include only secondary information and authorities’ statements, which can be either misleading or insufficient for presenting a clear picture (Morcelle 2021; Ali 2021). Moreover, the objectivity of the first type of writing is guaranteed by focusing on specific states and varying decisions, whereas the latter incorporates only generalized considerations, such as “the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act” (Upadhyaya et al. 2021; Morcelle 2021). Lastly, the academic publications are intended for developing practical solutions to the challenge of regulating abortions, and other popular sources only claim the presence of problems while lacking evidence underpinning opinions (Brown et al. 2020; Ali 2021). Therefore, the specified factors differentiating the two types of publications should be taken into account when choosing to trust one or another source.
In this way, the comparison of opinion and analytical writing showed that the distinguishing characteristics include the origin of information they use, the adoption of generalized or specific approaches to examination, and degrees of practicality. This conclusion implies that Solomon’s words in Proverbs 2:1-11 (Bible Gateway, n.d.) apply to both types while not guaranteeing that transparency correlates with effectiveness. Thus, the extent to which these articles reflect the search for insight is limited by the possibility of implementing findings.
References
Ali, Shaadie. 2021. “Stand Up For Abortion Rigths.” Web.
Bible Gateway. n.d. “Proverbs 2:1-11.” Web.
Brown, Benjamin P., Luciana E. Hebert, Melissa Gilliam, and Robert Kaestner. 2020. “Association of Highly Restrictive State Abortion Policies With Abortion Rates, 2000-2014.”JAMA Network Open 3, no. 11: e2024610. Web.
Guttmacher Institute. 2020. “Mandatory Counseling For Abortion.” Web.
Morcelle, Madeline. “Ensuring Equal Access to Abortion Coverage in Health Insurance: Introducing the EACH Act of 2021.” Web.
Upadhyaya, Ushma D., Ashley A. McCook, Ariana H. Bennett, Alice F. Cartwright, and Sarah C. M. Roberts. 2021. “State Abortion Policies and Medicaid Coverage of Abortion are Associated with Pregnancy Outcomes Among Individuals Seeking Abortion Recruited Using Google Ads: A National Cohort Study.” Social Science & Medicine 274: 113747. Web.