Introduction
The G4 movement involves four major countries: Brazil, Germany, India and Japan. These countries are pushing for expansion of the United Nations Security Council seats while, and at the same time, striving for each other to gain permanent seats on the assembly. These proposals are to be effected through a process that is similar to the 1963 Charter amendment voting that increased the number of permanent seats from eleven to fifteen and ensure equal participation of member countries in the council’s activities.
The need to reform the UNSecurity Council
Reforms in the Security Council are necessary to ensure that poor and rich countries are well represented in both permanent and non permanent assembly seats and those ones advocating for international peace which are given a chance to exercise their responsibilities (Sturchler, 2007). The reforms will also ensure the rule of lawis exercised as outlined in the security charter rather in the attaining global security.
Failures and shortcomings of the United Nations Security Council.
Most global security issues have political undertakings that the super powers use to dictate and influence the operations of the council, hence, overriding its procedures, for instance, the forceful invasion of Iraq by the United states of America without the consent of the council (Sturchler, 2007). Misplaced priorities like this war have exposed the council as being weak and inefficient while the existence of the international terror groups like Al-Qaeda is as a result of the limited ideologies on how to handle and manage them. There are so many inter-states conflicts that continue to raise international tensions and fear due to the little representation of the poor nations at the Security Council. The world summits are usually held in the countries that are developed in terms of economies, politics or ideologies which are very discriminatory.
How the proposal will address the concerns about theSecurity Council
This proposal to increase the number of both the permanent and non permanent seats in the Security Council will ensure that all the member states are regionally represented regardless of whether they are developed or underdeveloped (Sturchler, 2007). In addition to that, it will ensure decisions that are made with adequate considerations of member state’s dignity without the contravention of their policies or the practices. Moreover, the increasing the membership will ensure equal representation of members at the Security Council that will go a long way to boost credibility and trust of member states to the council and other United Nations affiliate organs.
Willingness and support for the proposal
Majority of the member states have faith in the Security Council reforms and, similar to the 1963 votes, there will be overwhelming support to vote for these reforms. Judging by the number of the member states representations at the G4 movement meetings, it is very clear that the G4 proposals are good enough and will go through as security matters are urgent and important for countries relations and development.
Conclusion
The main question of the G4 movement is an improvement on the existing structure. The G4 movement is advocating for simple majority voting as a fair way of increasing the number ofpermanent seats at the Security Council unlike the unjustified consensus proposal by the Coffee Club members which is a replication of the existing structure.
Reference
Sturchler, N. (2007). The Threat of Force in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.