James Grimmelmann was the author of The Google Dilemma. James was an associate law professor at New York Law School, and also an associate of the institution’s Institute for Information Law and Policy. He completed his Journalism Degree from Yale Law School, where he got employed as LawMeme Chief Editor. He was also a Yale Law Journal registered associate.
Prior to attending the law school, James obtained a Harvard College Bachelor of Arts Degree in computer science, and, thereafter, joined Microsoft as a programmer. He had the opportunity to secure an attachment as a legal clerk at both the Creative Commons and Electronic Frontier Foundation, and later, as a resident member, James got offered a position at Yale’s Information Society Program.
Given his vast experiences in different capacities, James Grimmelman was credible. His stints as a journalist, editor, programmer, law clerk, and technologist made him a credible source of information. He wrote many articles on diverse topics. Some of the topics he wrote on included social media, intellectual copyrights, and internet security.
Academic Search Premier listed several works of James Grimmelman. This included; Dr. Generative Or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the iPhone, the Internet is a Semicommons, The ethical Visions of Copyright Law, and Regulations by Software, among others.
The article targeted the general public and not the experts. This was evident in the author’s choice of words and the explanations made. In order to let the general public comprehend, Grimmelman chose to apply five examples. In case the experts were his target audience, he would not use examples to explain his points as they would easily understand him.
The Google Dilemma was a review. It critically evaluated some of the dilemmas that Google faced in recent times. A good example of the evaluation was when the author critically analyzed why governments were powerless when it came to controlling search engines.
The information used in the review was factual. This was because the sources used were authentic and confirmation by the research team on 28th November 2008 revealed the same. All the sources used by the author were available online, and research was carried out prior to publication.
The author was objective. He intended to educate the general public on the search engines, their biases, and how they controlled and affected the lives of users.
The author’s purpose in The Google Dilemma was to enlighten the general public on what goes on in the search engines. He expressed how the regulators of search engines possessed great authority over all internet subscribers, and to a given extent, the internet. He applied five distinct cases in the history of Google to demonstrate the disagreements over the search and the immense authority that Google had in determining whose opinions trended the internet.
In search Mongolian Gerbils, the author noted that the internet’s usability was a result of search engines. In Talentless Hack, the critic sought to establish that a successful Googlebomb was not a manifestation of the true agreement of internet subscribers, but could be essential in consensus development.
On the other hand, in Search: Jew, the author explained that whatever Google did was due to programmers’ instructions. While in Search: Search King, the author depicted search engines as untouchable, and could not be held liable for certain actions as they had the protection of the First Amendment. Lastly, in Search: Tiananmen, the writer noted that the governments had no authority and could not direct search engines.