Walmart Incorporation: Liquidity Analysis Research Paper

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

Introduce the Section

This section includes a discussion of the liquidity position of Wal Mart Incorporation and its comparison with competitors, i.e. Target Corporation and industry averages. Liquidity ratios are determined to evaluate the liquidity position of a business, which in turn allows the determination of a business’s strength with respect to the payment of its current liabilities(Gibson, 2012).

Discuss results of ratios and trends

The days’ sales in receivables for Wal Mart have shown consistent but small increments in the past three years. However, the value for the ratio is still indicative of a favorable position for the company and shows that Wal Mart’s cash flows are managed in an efficient manner as the company can collect amounts receivable more swiftly than its competitor. It is because of this efficiency that the accounts receivable turnover and accounts receivable turnover in days of Wal Mart is higher.

On the other hand, although days’ sale in inventory for Wal Mart is on a rising trend, the lower values for ratio imply that the company can convert its inventory into sales more swiftly and it is due to this reason that the inventory turnover and inventory turnover in days are also presenting a favorable position for the company.

In addition, the operating cycle for Wal Mart has also been determined, which indicates the number of days it takes for the inventory to be sold and cash received from debtors. The operating cycle of the company has increased since there have been unfavorable changes in the inventory and accounts receivable turnover during the past three years. Apart from this, the current ratio, cash ratio, and acid ratio show that the liquidity position of the company has remained more or less on the same pattern in the past three years.

Comparison with a competitor

While comparing the liquidity position of Wal Mart with Target Corporation, it can be observed that Wal Mart is in a much better position. The overall comparison of the two companies reveals that Target Corporation is preferring risk aversion.

Comparison with Industry Average

The comparison of Wal Mart’s liquidity position with that of industry averages indicates that the company is slightly behind the industry averages for the current ratio and acid ratio(Bloomberg Businessweek, 2013).

Summarize the Section

There are no significant changes noted in the liquidity position of Wal Mart during the past three years. However, the liquidity position of Target Corporation has been better as compared to Wal Mart during the past three years. Apart from this, Wal Mart has been more efficient than its competitor and it is therefore that the company has been able to maintain ample cash resources for dealing with its day to day needs.

Exhibit

Liquidity RatiosWAL-MART STORES, INC.TARGET CORPORATION
201320122011201320122011
Days’ Sales in Receivables5.304.884.4329.6333.8937.97
Accounts Receivable Turnover68.8774.7682.3311.8010.378.88
Accounts Receivables Turnover in Days5.304.884.4330.9435.1941.13
Days’ Sales in Inventory45.3644.3442.2357.0460.3960.64
Inventory Turnover8.058.238.646.396.176.19
Inventory Turnover in Days45.3644.3442.2357.1059.1658.97
Operating Cycle50.6649.2346.6688.0394.34100.10
Working Capital(11,878)(7,325)(6,591)2,3572,1627,143
Current Ratio0.830.880.891.171.151.71
Acid Test0.200.200.210.470.470.78
Cash Ratio0.110.110.130.060.060.17
Sales to Working Capital-39.24-60.59-63.5631.8514.729.24
Cash Flow/Cur. Mat. of Debt & NP2.013.823.903.561.7944.29

Long-Term Debt Paying Ability

Introduction the Section

This section includes an analysis of the leverage position of the company in comparison with its competitor and industry averages. The long term debt paying ability helps in evaluating the extent to which a company relies on debt and equity financing to fulfill its working capital and long term financing needs. Moreover, these ratios are also helpful in evaluating the solvency position of the company(Gibson, 2012).

Discuss results of ratios and trends

The time’s interest earned ratio and fixed charge coverage for Wal Mart fell in 2012 as compared to 2011 but has increased in 2013. The primary reason behind the decrease in 2012 was an increase in financing expenses, which have declined in 2013 to enable the company to report a higher ability to pay off its financial expenses through its profits. Apart from this, the debt ratio for the company increased in 2012 from 2011 and then slightly declined in 2013.

This variation has been noted due to an increase in the long-term debt of the company and then a considerable decline in 2013. Due to the same reason, the debt to equity ratio and debt to the tangible net worth of Wal Mart has also shown similar trends in the past three years. Lastly, the cash flow to debt ratio declined in 2012 but increased in 2013. A declining trend has been noted in 2012 because debt increased and cash flows decreased, which resulted in a low cash flow to debt ratio.

Comparison with a competitor

The comparison of Wal Mart’s long term debt paying ability with Target Corporation shows that the company has performed considerably better in comparison with its competitor, and also Wal Mart has maintained a lower debt and debt to equity ratio than Target. Moreover, as far as a cash flow to debt ratio is concerned, Wal Mart is in a better position than its competitor, as it can cover more proportion of its debt by cash flows than Target.

Comparison with Industry Average

Wal Mart’s long term liabilities ratios are highest as compared to the industry average(Bloomberg Businessweek, 2013). For instance, the total debt to total equity and total liabilities to total assets comparison of industry and Wal Mart shows that Wal Mart is ahead of the industry in relation to both these ratios(Bloomberg Businessweek, 2013).

Summarize the Section

In this section, it has been found that Wal Mart is placed in a much better position as compared to its competitor in terms of long term debt paying ability.

Exhibit

L.T.D. Paying Ability RatiosWAL-MART STORES, INC.TARGET CORPORATION
201320122011201320122011
Times Interest Earned12.0411.2211.356.175.696.79
Fixed Charge Coverage9.068.679.025.905.436.34
Debt Ratio59.76%60.83%60.59%65.62%66.07%64.56%
Debt/Equity148.48%155.28%153.74%190.87%194.73%182.20%
Debt to Tangible Net Worth198.18%213.47%201.04%193.49%197.76%184.87%
Cash Flow/Total Debt21.09%20.62%21.58%16.85%17.64%18.68%

Profitability

Introduction the Section

This section entails the profitability analysis of Wal Mart by considering the financial information of the company pertaining to the past three financial years. Profitability ratios are used to evaluate the returns earned by a company in relation to its total assets, investments, equity, operating assets, fixed assets, etc. (Gibson, 2012).

Discuss results of ratios and trends

Wal Mart’s revenues have not shown significant increments over the past three years and as a result of this and the operating income for the company has grown at a constant rate of 6 percent during 2011, 2012, and 2013. It is due to this reason that the profitability ratios have also shown steady increases year on year. However, it has to be noted that there has been a decline noted in different profitability ratios from 2011 to 2012; as for instance net profit margin, total asset turnover, return on assets, operating income margin, return on operating assets, and return on investment have all declined in 2012 owing to lower profits earned by the company in 2012.

One main reason behind the decrease in profitability ratios is that the company has focused on leading the market through low prices. However, apart from low growth in profits earned by the company and the fact that there has been increasing in assets, investments, and equity, there has been a slight improvement in most of the ratios, which is commendable.

Comparison with a competitor

The comparison of Wal Mart’s profitability ratios with Target Corporation shows that the company has underperformed in comparison with its competitor in terms of net profit margin, operating income margin, and gross profit margin, whereas in relation to other ratios, Wal Mart has a significant lead over its competitor. As mentioned earlier, Wal Mart’s management has been striving to become a market leader in low-priced goods, which has ultimately affected the revenues and in turn profitability of the company.

Apart from this, a comparison of net income and total assets, investments, and equity of the two companies show that there is a considerable difference between the two. However, it is still relevant to state here that Target has been more efficient and profitable about some ratios than Wal Mart.

Comparison with Industry Average

Reviewing the profitability at the industry level and comparing the same with Wal Mart’s ratios, it has been noted that Wal Mart is ahead of its industry averages. This implies that Wal Mart is leading the industry in terms of profit ratios, particularly, return on assets, return on equity, return on capital(Bloomberg Businessweek, 2013).

Summarize the Section

The profitability ratios for Wal Mart are presenting a better picture in comparison with Target Corporation and industry averages.

Exhibit

Profitability RatiosWAL-MART STORES, INC.TARGET CORPORATION
201320122011201320122011
Net Profit Margin3.81%3.69%4.06%4.17%4.28%4.44%
Total Asset Turnover2.352.372.391.521.521.49
Return on Assets8.96%8.76%9.68%6.33%6.48%6.62%
Operating Income Margin5.96%5.98%6.10%7.24%7.77%7.98%
Operating Asset Turnover2.662.682.681.561.551.52
Return on Operating Assets15.89%16.03%16.33%11.30%12.05%12.11%
Sales to Fixed Assets4.174.134.092.502.582.65
Return on Investment14.72%14.18%15.60%10.52%10.60%10.21%
Return on Total Equity21.59%21.36%22.78%18.52%18.71%18.94%
Return on Common Equity21.59%21.36%22.78%18.52%18.71%18.94%
Gross Profit Margin24.38%24.50%24.83%29.73%30.10%30.49%

Investor Analysis

Introduction the Section

Investor ratios help assist investors to evaluate their respective investments in line with the trends and patterns shown by the financial performance indicators of the company in which they have invested. This section includes the calculation of investment ratios for Wal Mart and their comparison with competitor and industry averages.

Discuss results of ratios and trends

The degree of financial leverage for Wal Mart has been more or less on a similar track in the past three financial years. On the other hand, the earnings per share of the company have increased steadily over the past three years due to an increase in its net income earned progressively during the period under consideration. Moreover, due to a consistent increase in operating cash flows, the operating cash flow per share has increased. Besides, due to an increase in cash dividends, the operating cash flow per cash dividend has been on a declining trend.

Comparison with a competitor

The comparison of Wal Mart’s investment ratios with that of Target Corporation’s ratios shows that there is no significant difference between the two companies in this regard. For instance, there is only a marginal difference between the degree of financial leverage, earnings per share, price/earnings ratio, percentage of earnings retained, dividend payout, dividend yield, and book value per share. However, there are some areas where the difference between the two companies is considerable; for instance, there is a significantly higher materiality of options for Target as compared to Wal Mart. Besides, operating cash flow per share, operating cash flow per cash dividend and year end market prices also show a significant difference between the two companies.

Comparison with Industry Average

The comparison of investment ratios with industry averages reveals that Wal Mart’s earnings per share growth are better than the industry average (Bloomberg Businessweek, 2013). This shows that the company has a better earning potential on its stocks than industry averages.

Summarize the Section

This section has revealed that Wal Mart’s investment ratios are more or less posing similar situation as Target Corporation. Also, the company has earned a better place about earnings per share growth in comparison with industry averages.

Exhibit

Investor Analysis RatiosWAL-MART STORES, INC.TARGET CORPORATION
201320122013201220132012
Degree of Financial Leverage1.091.101.091.171.191.17
Earnings per Share5.024.524.474.524.284.00
Price/Earnings Ratio13.9313.5812.5413.5311.6913.59
Percentage of Earnings Retained68.46%67.85%72.93%69.89%73.47%77.43%
Dividend Payout31.67%32.30%27.07%30.53%26.87%23.00%
Dividend Yield2.27%2.38%2.16%2.26%2.30%1.69%
Book Value per Share24.4221.9019.4925.2123.3021.40
Materiality of Options0.18%0.18%0.32%12.77%5.67%11.86%
Oper. Cash Flow per Share7.556.986.448.037.957.23
Oper. Cash Flow/Cash Dividends4.774.805.335.906.998.00
Year-end Market Price69.9561.3656.0761.1550.0554.35

Conclusion

The financial analysis of Wal Mart and its comparison with competitor and industry averages has been presented in this report. The conclusion reached in this analysis is that Wal Mart has a satisfactory liquidity position and profitability trends, as has been noted in the past three years. In addition to this, the long term debt paying ability and investors ratios of the company is also projecting a satisfactory scenario for investors and investment in the company.

Reference List

Akwetey, L. M. (2011). Business Administration for Students & Managers. trafford Publishing.

Barrow, C. (2011). Practical Financial Management. London: Kogan Page Ltd.

Bloomberg Businessweek. (2013). WAL-MART STORES INC (WMT: New York Consolidated): Financial Ratios. Web.

Daily Finance. (2013). Wal-Mart Stores. Web.

Drury, C. (2008). Management & Cost accounting. Derby: Pat Bond.

Gibson, C. H. (2012). Financial Reporting and Analysis. Mason: South-Western Cengage Learning.

Investing Money. (2013). Wal-Mart Stores (NYSE: WMT). Web.

Morning Star. (2013). Wal-Mart Stores Inc WMT. Web.

Reuters. (2013). Wal-Mart Stores Inc (WMT.N). Web.

Target Corporation. (2011). ANNUAL REPORT 2011. Minneapolis: Target Corporation.

Target Corporation. (2012). ANNUAL REPORT 2012. Minneapolis: Target Corporation.

Target Corporation. (2013). ANNUAL REPORT 2013. Minneapolis: Target Corporation.

Tennet, J. (2008). Guide to Financial Management. London: Profile Books Ltd.

WAL MART. (2013b). 8 K REPORT. Bentonville: WAL MART.

WAL MART. (2011). ANNUAL REPORT 2011. WALMART STORES.

WAL MART. (2012). ANNUAL REPORT 2012. Bentonville: WALMART STORES.

WAL MART. (2013a). ANNUAL REPORT 2013. Bentonville: WALMART STORES.

Yahoo Finance. (2013). Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (WMT) Industry; Departmental stores. Web.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2021, February 25). Walmart Incorporation: Liquidity Analysis. https://ivypanda.com/essays/walmart-incorporation-liquidity-analysis/

Work Cited

"Walmart Incorporation: Liquidity Analysis." IvyPanda, 25 Feb. 2021, ivypanda.com/essays/walmart-incorporation-liquidity-analysis/.

References

IvyPanda. (2021) 'Walmart Incorporation: Liquidity Analysis'. 25 February.

References

IvyPanda. 2021. "Walmart Incorporation: Liquidity Analysis." February 25, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/walmart-incorporation-liquidity-analysis/.

1. IvyPanda. "Walmart Incorporation: Liquidity Analysis." February 25, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/walmart-incorporation-liquidity-analysis/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Walmart Incorporation: Liquidity Analysis." February 25, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/walmart-incorporation-liquidity-analysis/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
1 / 1