Lincoln appeared to be a natural born leader, possessing the capacity to control a room, deliver a compelling presentation, and compromise. He is widely recognized as one of America’s finest leaders. As a leader, Lincoln was adamant about holding together a country that was unraveling at the seams. It is tough to picture where the United States would be now if he had not led the country through the turbulent Civil War.
Lincoln’s reputation is built on his monumental accomplishments: he recently accomplished a political fight and civil war that maintained the Union, abolished enslavement, and provided African-Americans with civic and social liberty. Lincoln was a leader who was open to discussion and criticism. He used conversation with the American culture and community of the time to enhance his administration, and he exploited the opinions of people to identity faults and strengthen his national reputation (Galli, 2017). The US President listened to counsel but also went with his gut whenever he felt it was appropriate.
A visionary style defines criteria and keeps track of progress with respect to the bigger picture. A participative leader involves team members in the decision process and aggressively searches out possibilities for consensus. Situational leadership is founded on the idea that the leader adjusts to the circumstances. Abraham Lincoln was a participatory leader, which is described as a style of leadership that encourages individuals and societal systems to change. It promotes useful and positive change in members in its ideal shape, with the eventual objective of growing a following into leadership. Lincoln’s leadership created a plan not just for the preservation of the Union, but also for a recreated union free of hate and the desire for vengeance.
Reference
Galli, B. J. (2017). Lessons From Lincoln’s Leadership. Journal of Leadership Studies, 11(2), 72-80.