Turnaround at Nissan Essay

Introduction

Currently, the key task for management is successfully executing change in organisations. Organisational change denotes the set of different activities that yield an alteration in the course and progressions that influence the manner in which organisations operate. This paper analyses the case study of the triumphant turnaround of Nissan.

The paper explores what was done to better effectiveness, adaptation, and human dealings, and the manner in which the potential transactions amid the performance determining factors were dealt with.

Additionally, this paper will evaluate the features and expertise that elucidate successful tactical leadership perspective of Carlos Ghosn. Finally, the cross-cultural deliberations Carlos must take into consideration when executing change at Nissan is examined.

What was done to improve efficiency, adaptation, and human relations, and how were the potential trade-offs among these performance determinants handled?

Tactical leadership is a complex issue that entails managing organisations and assisting them in dealing with the current internationalised business setting (Laschinger et al. 2001). Various researches affirm the significance of tactical leadership in illustrating that an organisation is an indication of their pinnacle leader.

Different studies concluded that tactical leadership is connected with several constructive organisational outcomes (De Luque et al. 2008). Tactical leadership is majorly seen as a part of the critical propellers of efficient policy execution.

Pliable and adaptive leadership means that top leaders have an impact on the fiscal performance of any organisation through their influence on the major determining factors of the fiscal performance of organisations (that is, human dealings, efficiency, and adaptation).

Leadership and management studies offer powerful proof that pliable and adaptive leadership is vital for the majority of managers (Elenkov & Fileva 2006; Arnold et al. 2000), which is particularly significant in cases of noteworthy change. Additional proof of the necessity of pliability in conduct when assuming a leadership position in a foreign nation, like in the case of Carlos Ghosn, is offered by cross-cultural study.

At the time of his initial days as the leader at Nissan, Carlos Ghosn instigated several changes. His initial step was to establish nine cross-operational groups and granting them the opportunity to provide probable explanations. Strengthening cross-cultural groups is significant since strengthening them is reported to boost pliability as well as efficiency in an organisation.

In a bid to enhance efficiency, Carlos Ghosn took up a cost leadership policy and concentrated on quality control (Leonard-Barton 1992). The initial step taken by Ghosn in this regard was shutting five plants in Japan thus getting rid of 21,000 workers.

In a bid to ease production progressions at the rest of the plants and to ensure that they become more efficient, Ghosn decreased the quantity of suppliers in a bid to cut down on the costs of purchase (Eren, Zehir & Özşahin 2004). To enhance adaptation and build on client appeal, Carlos Ghosn employed Shiro Nakamura, an inventive designer, who turned out to be a major leader in the turnaround attempts.

Designers took up the responsibility of choosing the design, and Carlos Ghosn supported their being inventive instead of just being copy competitors. In a bid to boost human dealings at Nissan, Carlos Ghosn decreased the number of dealerships possessed by the company and went ahead to boost management at the rest of the dealerships. Moreover, vital changes were as well made in the human resource progressions (Pahl 2008).

A merit compensation plan was developed, and rather than being compensate based on seniority, workers were awarded for their performance (Bremner, Edmondson & Dawson 2004).

Sectors of responsibility were as well acutely described so that performance would be gauged with regard to particular objectives, and studies have shown that fairness has connections with organisational citizenship conducts (Fedora et al. 2001).

Furthermore, recent research examines the impact of fairness on dedication. Carlos Ghosn had numerous goals that were interconnected in intricate manner and thus necessitated cautious balancing of competing goals since efforts to better one goal may have challenged attempts to attain an associated goal.

For instance, offering a high degree of compensation and monetary advantages could boost gratification as well as readiness to stay in the organisation, but the costs of operation will increase. Carlos Ghosn dealt with this trade-off triumphantly as the gains obtained through efficient performance translated into the reduction of the costs of operation (Paik & Choi 2005).

Using theory and research to inform your answer, describe why some of the changes Ghosn made were effective

In spite of the argument by Slater, Paliwoda, and Slater (2009) that there are no international rules with respect to leading and management of change, a number of realistic directions have been provided to organisations and managers. Firkola (2009) lists eight strides that leaders of organisations must embrace to execute change successfully.

He proposed that the foundation in any triumphant change progression is to append a feeling of urgency and significance to change, which is the foundation for establishing an idea for change. An efficient idea is conceivable, enviable, practicable, focused, pliable, and communicable.

Idea plays a major function in providing helpful change by assisting in guiding, lining up and motivating activities with regard to a great number of individuals. Devoid of a suitable idea, a change attempt can effortlessly disband into a list of mystifying, mismatched, as well as time consuming developments that head in the wrong way or nowhere whatsoever.

Idea assists in establishing dedication, motivation, and encouragement by linking individuals emotionally and mentally to the organisation. Additionally, it is connected to organisational development and achievement (Palanski & Yammarino 2009).

Establishing and communicating idea is a significant leadership undertaking as it is connected positively with additional tasks of workers and performance of the organisation. Empirical studies affirm that leaders denoted as creative have positive impacts on their organisations as well as followers. A couple of recent meta-analytical research backs this conclusion.

Through the explanation of the necessity for change, establishment of new ideas, and intensification of dedication to these ideas, leaders could finally effect changes in organisations. Simons (2002) asserts that the idea of change must be communicated to the workers through every achievable way.

Scott, Bishop, and Chen (2003) posit that the dealings between the leader and subordinate staff have a noteworthy influence on their readiness to embrace change.

Inadequate communication of change to the workers that will be executing it an a shortage of verbal and non-verbal indications that individuals employ in developing understanding brings about the attempt to search for any supply of information on what is taking place.

It is thus paramount for organisations to boost their communication with workers all through the change progression and beyond to decrease their worry and opposition (Pearce & Robinson 2007). Workers are frequently ready to embrace change if only they comprehend the facts. Communication that is clear and candid with workers assists them line up positively to the future of their company.

Daft (2008); Dirks and Ferrin (2002); Goleman (2000), and other researchers in this field stress on the significance of communication to encourage change within organisations efficiently.

Carlos Ghosn made efforts to make sure that workers know the necessity of change and individuals that would be affected by the change. Ghosn comprehended that the majority of workers opted to be aware of the effect of change to them and get ready for it, instead of staying in a condition of doubt and worry.

The attendance of Ghosn in person during meetings with workers had a noteworthy influence on them, as it played a key role in preventing the progression of change from encountering insufficient top-down communication (Phipps & Burbach 2010). Moreover, it barred the rumours from spreading by ensuring that workers become pre-engaged with themselves, their earnings, and their profession.

Additionally, it curbed the propagation of false and provocative information amid workers and assisted in reducing anxiety and negative retorts they could have been experiencing. Ghosn aimed at evading job turnover, doubt, displeasure and reduced trust.

The direct dealings of Ghosn with workers were perceived to reflect openness and influenced the manner in which workers recognised the reliability of the new management. Even though reliability alone is not enough to guarantee trust, lack of reliability weakens trust.

A meta-scrutiny carried out by Martensen and Gronholdt (2001) establishes dependable connections between trust in a leader and a scope of positive leadership results, which encompass job satisfaction, motivation, organisational dedication, and job performance. The trust the workers developed towards Ghosn assisted in turning their dedication to change efficacy.

According to Luecke (2003), the actual driver to effective change is strengthened teams. Masi and Cooke (2000) recommend facilitating workers to take part in early stages of the change programmes.

Workers at the Nissan Company applied the contribution and empowerment of employees when Carlos Ghosn chose to establish a plan for change that depended on their recommendations, which was beneficial as compared to employing outside consultants.

Carlos Ghosn started by setting up cross-operational teams to create choices for radical change. Additionally, designers were accorded the last word over choices that pertain to design. This aspect permitted the designers at Nissan to be more inventive and creative.

Anita and Jill (2003) point out that empowerment is significant for inspiring and managing inventiveness in organisations due to the potential gains that could emanate from it and that encompass increased dedication, better choices, enhanced quality, additional novelty and greater job satisfaction. Furthermore, the innovative attempts of empowered employees endure in spite of the persistent and environmental obstructions.

Bossidy and Charan (2002), Clark, Hartline, and Jones (2008), and Dunning (2003) establish a noteworthy connection involving contribution of workers and job satisfaction. Pisapia (2011) recognises a connection involving empowerment of employees and worker contentment, faithfulness, and motivation.

Moreover, empowerment of employees assists them in better adjusting in accordance with the change. In addition, according to Hitt, Ireland, and Hoskisson (2007), leaders have the ability to motivate employees in embracing and effecting change.

In accordance with the theory of leadership grid, collective efforts through teamwork are more likely to achieve the necessity for change and embrace it in instances where their leaders keep them stimulated. Berson and Avolio (2004) posit that change is not achievable and successful unless its recipients embrace it.

The success of change often relies on the way a leader can equate the requirements of both instrumental (the present task) with the communicative (the human dealings aspects). Carlos Ghosn managed to balance the instrumental and communicative requirements.

What traits and skills can help to explain the successful strategic leadership by Ghosn?

The effective tactical leadership by Carlos Ghosn could be described by various attributes and expertise. According to Collins (2001), leadership capabilities have a noteworthy connection with the organisational achievement and change. Intellectual capacities are among the attributes that contributed to the achievement brought about y the leadership of Ghosn.

Effective tactical leadership demands the psychological or cognitive capacities to recognise and comprehend information, find suitable grounds in it, deem possibilities, apply instincts, make choices, resolve difficulties and arrive at decisions. The aforementioned capacities yield ideas, tasks and collective values and policies for pursuing the ideas and tasks.

Researches investigating the traits of successful leadership have pointed out intelligence as a key factor in the character of leaders. Nevertheless, a number of studies affirm that intellectual capacities cannot envisage leadership presentation to any significant extent.

Contrary, other studies like the one by Cote and Miners (2006) place intelligence among the best forecasters of broad job performance. The connection involving intellectual capacity and performance is more powerful for complex jobs, verifying the significance of intelligence creating effective changes, since the responsibilities of leaders are essentially complex.

Hrebiniak (2005) establishes traits like intelligence, truthfulness, charisma, and gentleness to be among the ideal traits of a leader. In reality, intelligence acts as the sole trait affirmed as vitally significant for all leaders to have in a bid to realise successful strategic leadership.

The psychological intelligence of Ghosn as well played a vital role to the success of his leadership. The capacity to comprehend oneself as well as others, illustrate self-discipline and self-assurance and to react to others in a suitable manner is referred to as Emotional Intelligence (IE) (Stanley 2009).

According to Kaplan and Norton (2004), the major constituents of psychological intelligence include self-consciousness, psychological management, self-inspiration, understanding, managing affiliations, communication proficiencies and personal approach. Psychologically intelligent leaders make use of individual referent command instead of positional command or authority.

Segrestin (2005) establishes a constructive affiliation involving referent command and dedication. In their meta-investigation of the manner in which negative response influences the performance of workers, Yukl (2002) establishes that advancement in the performance of workers is positively associated with referent command.

Researches therefore affirm that leaders that possess referent command are successful since they are capable of creating dedication and high performance in the workers (Storey 2004). Studies on the application of various kinds of authority propose that successful leaders depend a lot on an individual command as compared to dependence on positional command.

Millikin and Fu (2005) echo the position of individual command by affirming that leadership is influence, but not supremacy and individuals that oblige others to conduct bidding due to their authority are not leaders.

In spite of this element, leaders that employ referent command could encounter misinterpretation in cross-cultural circumstances because the manners in which workers relate to their leaders vary from a culture to another.

Besides psychological intellect, Emotional Intelligence is the major factor in recognising and enhancing the collective values that back the search for ideas, tasks, and policies and to strengthening and motivating people (Walumbwa & Lawler 2003). Emotional Intelligence as well permits leaders to revere their followers as individuals with special requirements, notions, sentiments, and views.

Workers are thus inspired to carry out their responsibilities with diligence in a bid to attain the goals of organisations. A research by Yukl and Becker (2006) illustrates that the emotional intelligence of leaders bear a noteworthy influence on organisational conduct of subordinate staff in addition to job satisfaction.

High EI boosts the communication proficiencies required for successful leadership (Thompson & Strickland 2003). Integrity is as well reported as a key trait of successful leadership, and among the major personal attributes that shape a successful leader. The truthfulness and integrity of Carlos Ghosn added into the accomplishment of his tactical leadership (Wong & Law 2002).

As earlier mentioned, integrity bears a more constructive influence on social features of job performance (for instance, administering human capital) as compared to non-social features (like managing budgets), revealing the necessity of integrity in establishing changes as it demands administration of human capital.

Yoshino (1995) affirms that the high integrity of a leader offers followers a feeling of confidence with respect to activities undertaken by the leader. With regard to this feeling of confidence, a follower has a higher probability of trusting the leader.

Studies have as well demonstrated that in circumstances where followers trust their leaders, the followers have a tendency of performing better, show greater dedication to organisations, have a greater feeling of job satisfaction, and are less swayed to leaving the organisation.

A meta-investigation carried out by Suff and Reilly (2007) establishes dependable associations between trusting leaders and a scope of positive results, encompassing job satisfaction, boosted job performance, and dedication to organisation.

Choose which of these leadership styles best describes Ghosn’s leadership approach (transformational, change-oriented, or empowering)

In a bid to illustrate the leadership approach adopted by Carlos Ghosn clearly, all the three styles have first been analysed. Leaders that make use of the transformational style are greatly communicative, self-assured, and unwavering. These leaders have a powerful conviction in their beliefs and principles. Charismatic leaders strengthen, demonstrate confidence in, and back their followers.

Weber (2010) affirms that transformational style of leadership is successful across different cultures. In addition, Ghosn (2002) supports soundness of the application of transformational style in different circumstances and cultures.

Daidj (2009) articulates the observation that the standards and progressions of charismatic leadership possibly applies in different circumstances; nevertheless, there are cases where they are more relevant than in others.

Therefore, both the materialisation and success of charismatic leadership could improve via a number of situations and held back by others. For instance, charismatic leaders have a higher likelihood of emerging under situations of commotion and crisis (that is, change process) than under situations of continuity and constancy.

Nonetheless, crisis is not an adequate or necessary situation for the materialisation of charismatic leadership. Transformational leadership affirms a collective realistic notion concerning the future, motivates subordinate staff mentally, and takes into consideration the disparities amid them.

Sapsford and Shirouzu (2006) illustrate that transformational leaders bear an altering impact on both organisations and employees. The transformational leadership of Ghosn is clear from his individual authority. Other instances to demonstrate his transformational leadership emanate from well-expressed means of communication and integrity.

Under change-oriented style, much emphasis is placed on comprehension of the environment, promoting and enhancing required changes, and establishing inventive manner to adjust to such changes. Change-oriented leaders share similar characteristics as in both transformational and charismatic leadership (Graetz 2000).

In the case of Nissan, Carlos Ghosn empowered workers to boost pro-activity and assists them in better aligning to changes. Ghosn, in addition, established and communicated future perspectives of the success of the organisational change of the company. Notions of organisations as the ones Ghosn had have been reported to boost the motivation of workers and their flexibility to change significantly (Yoon 2008).

Empowerment of leaders offers workers the required power and independence to permit them to implement control at the place of work. Due to its transformational character, empowering of employees could be a triumphant way of influencing workers to take up ideas and values of management (House et al. 2004).

In the case of Nissan, Carlos Ghosn provided the cross-operational team the task and autonomy to select the change they required. The leadership styles adopted by Ghosn are thus transformational, empowering, and change-oriented.

What cross-cultural considerations would Ghosn have had to consider when implementing change at Nissan?

Ghosn had to tackle numerous cross-cultural deliberations to have a turnaround of Nissan (Yoshino & Fagan 2003). Universal approval of an aspect does not bar cultural variations in the ratification of it. Cultural sets differ in their concepts of the most critical attributes of successful leadership.

There is thus the requirement of a greater comprehension of the manner in which leadership is established in different cultures with a necessity for empirically established theory to explicate different conducts and efficiency in various cultures. The impact of national culture on the enculturation of change could be difficult to identify empirically, and as well difficult to deny.

The significance of national culture comes out clearly as illustrated by Fiedler (2002) who compares the attitudes of both Americans and Japanese with regard to objective functions. Contrary to the case in America, many individuals in Japan could affirm that the existence of companies is meant to profit their employees. Therefore, the actions of leaders must embrace the interests of workers into deliberation.

Recognition of both organisational and national culture is thus critical. National culture outlines as obtained from, for example, Freedman and Tregoe (2003) state that theoretical aspects of culture establish many theories concerning cross-cultural variations in leadership.

A number of aspects of culture include prevention of doubt, authority detachment, maleness –femaleness, individuality collectivism, and future course. According to Larsson and Lubatkin (2001), the culture of Japan is more of a shared culture, and transformational leadership materialises more effortlessly and is more efficient in shared cultures as compared to characteristic cultures.

Conclusion

In this paper, researches, studies, and theories have been applied to demonstrate why a number of the changes that were carried out by Ghosn were successful. Additionally, this paper has investigated the skills and traits elucidating the successful and tactical leadership by Ghosn. This study as well examined the case study of the turnaround of Nissan.

It has investigated what was carried out to boost effectiveness, adaptation, human dealings and the manner in which possible trade-offs amid the aforementioned determining factors of performance were dealt with.

Finally, the leadership approach by Carlos Ghosn has been examined and it shows his leadership styles as transformational, change-oriented, and empowering.There are also necessary cross-cultural deliberations that Ghosn could have to take into consideration while executing change at Nissan.

Reference List

Anita, R & Jill, R 2003, “Leadership and vision”, in S Janet & R Jill (eds), Managing Care in Practice, Routledge, London, pp. 57-82.

Arnold, J, Arad, S, Rhoades, J & Drasgow, F2000, ‘The empowering leadership questionnaire: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviour’, Journal of Organisational Behaviour, vol. 21 no. 1, pp. 249-269.

Berson, Y & Avolio, B 2004, ‘Transformational leadership and the dissemination of organisational goals: A case study of a telecommunications firm’, The Leadership Quarterly, vol. 15 no. 5, pp. 625-646.

Bossidy, L & Charan, R 2002, Execution: The Discipline of Getting Things Done, Random House, London.

Bremner, B, Edmondson, G & Dawson, C 2004, ‘Nissan’s boss’, Business Week, 03 October, p. 50.

Clark, R, Hartline, M & Jones, K 2008, ‘The effects of leadership style on hotel employees’ commitment to service quality’, Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, vol. 50 no. 2, pp. 209-231

Collins, J 2001, Good to Great, Random House, London.

Cote, S & Miners, C 2006, ‘Emotional intelligence, cognitive intelligence, and job performance’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 51 no.1, pp. 1-28.

Daft, R 2008, The leadership experience, 4th edn, Thomson Higher Education, Belmont.

Daidj, N 2009, “The Evolution of Corporate in Japan: The case of vertical keirestu groups”, in G Aras & D Crowther (eds), Global Perspectives on Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility, Gower Publishing Limited, Aldershot, pp. 73-106.

De Luque, M, Washburn, N, Waldman, D & House, R 2008, ‘Unrequited profit: How stakeholder and economic values relate to subordinates’ perceptions of leadership and firm performance’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 53 no. 1, pp. 626-654.

Dirks, K & Ferrin, D 2002, ‘Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice’, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 87 no. 1, pp. 611-628.

Dunning, H 2003, ‘Some antecedent of internalisation theory’, Journal of International Studies, vol. 34 no. 2, pp. 108-115.

Elenkov, D & Fileva,T 2006, ‘Anatomy of a business failure: Accepting the “bad luck” explanation vs. proactively learning in international business’, Cross Cultural Management, vol. 13 no. 2, pp. 132-141.

Eren, E, Zehir, C & Özşahin, M 2004, Change management effectiveness during the crises: Benchmarking industries and firms in terms of change management applications and firm performance, GBATA, Cape Town.

Fedora, D, Davis, W, Maslync, J & Mathieson, K 2001, ‘Performance improvement efforts in response to negative feedback: the roles of source power and recipient self-esteem’, Journal of Management, vol. 27 no. 1, pp. 79–97.

Fiedler, F 2002, “The curious role of cognitive resources in leadership”, in R Riggio, E, Murphy, & F Pirozzolo (eds), Multiple intelligences and leadership, Erlbaum Mahwah Associates Publishers, New Jersey, pp. 91-104.

Firkola, P 2009, Human Resources Management Practices within Japanese Companies. The Global Business Handbook: The Eight Dimensions of International Management, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.

Freedman, M & Tregoe, B 2003, The Art and Discipline of Strategic Leadership, McGraw-Hill, New York.

Ghosn, C 2002, ‘Saving the business without losing the company’, Harvard Business Review, vol. 80 no. 1, pp. 37-45.

Goleman, D 2000, ‘Leadership that gets results’, Harvard Business Review, vol. 50 no. 4, pp.78-90.

Graetz, F 2000, ‘Strategic change leadership’, Management Decision, vol. 38 no. 8, pp. 550-562.

Hitt, M, Ireland, R & Hoskisson, R 2007, Strategic Management: Competitiveness and Globalisation, 7th edn, Thomson/South Western, Ohio.

House, R, Hanges, P, Javidan, M, Dorfman, P & Gupta, V 2004, Leadership, Culture, and Organisations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.

Hrebiniak, L 2005, Making Strategy Work: Leading Effective Execution and Change, Wharton School Publishing, Upper Saddle River.

Kaplan, R & Norton, D 2004, Strategy Maps: Turning Intangible Assets into Tangible Results, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

Larsson, R & Lubatkin, M 2001, ‘Achieving acculturation in mergers and acquisitions: An international case survey’, Human Relations, vol. 54 no. 12, pp. 1573-1608.

Laschinger, H, Finegan, J, Shamian, J & Wilk P 2001, ‘Impact of structural and psychological empowerment on job strain in nursing work settings: expanding Kanter’s model’, Journal of Nursing Administration, vol. 31 no. 5, pp. 260-272.

Leonard-Barton, D 1992, ‘Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development’, Strategic Management Journal, vol.13 no.1, pp. 111–125.

Luecke, R 2003, Managing Change and Transition, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

Martensen, A & Gronholdt, L 2001, ‘Using employee satisfaction measurement to improves people management: An adaptation of Kano’s quality types’, Total Quality Management, vol. 7 no. 1, pp. 949-957.

Masi, R &Cooke, R 2000, ‘Effects of transformational leadership on subordinate motivation, empowering norms, and organisational productivity’, International Journal of Organisational Analysis, vol. 8 no.1, pp. 16-47.

Millikin, J & Fu, D 2005, ‘The global leadership of Carlos Ghosn at Nissan’, Thunderbird International Business Review, vol. 47 no. 1 pp. 121-137.

Pahl, N 2008, The Role of Emotional Intelligence in Leadership. GRIN Verlag.

Paik, Y & Choi, D 2005, ‘The shortcomings of a standardised global knowledge management system: The case study of Accenture’, Academy of management executive, vol. 19 no. 2, pp. 81-84.

Palanski, M & Yammarino, F 2009, ‘Integrity and leadership: A multi-level conceptual framework’, The Leadership Quarterly, vol. 1 no. 1, pp. 405–420.

Pearce, J & Robinson, R 2007, Formulation, Implementation and Control of Competitive Strategy, 9th edn, McGraw-Hill Irwin, Boston.

Phipps, K & Burbach, M 2010, ‘Strategic Leadership in the Nonprofit Sector: Opportunities for Research’, Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, vol. 11 no. 2, pp. 137-154.

Pisapia, J 2011, ‘Finding the Future and Making It Happen’, Towards the Next Orbit: Corporate Odyssey, vol. 1 no. 1, p. 55-56.

Sapsford, J & Shirouzu 2006, ‘Inside Japan’s big car makers, the US hires gain new influence’, Wall Street Journal, 27 April, p. 27.

Scott, D, Bishop, J & Chen, X 2003, ‘An examination of the relationship of employee involvement with job satisfaction, employee cooperation and intention to quit in the U.S. invested enterprise in China’, International Journal of Organisational Analysis, vol. 1 no. 1, pp. 3-19.

Segrestin, B 2005, ‘Partnering to explore: The Renault–Nissan Alliance as a forerunner of new cooperative patterns’, Research Policy, vol. 34 no. 5, pp. 657-672.

Simons, T 2002, ‘Behavioural integrity: The perceived alignment between managers’ words and deeds as a research focus’, Organisational Science, vol. 13 no. 1, pp. 18−35.

Slater, S, Paliwoda, S & Slater, J 2009, ‘The global implementation of the “winner’s competitive cycle”’, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, vol. 1 no. 2, pp. 144-154.

Stanley, M 2009, ‘Resolving people issues key to making mergers work’, The Press and Journal, 16 February, p.39.

Storey, J 2004, Leadership in Organisations: Current Issues and Key Trends, Routledge, London.

Suff, P & Reilly, P 2007, Merging Rewards: Paying for Business Change, The Institute for Employment Studies, Brighton.

Thompson, A & Strickland, A 2003, Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases, 13th edn, McGraw-Hill, New York.

Walumbwa, F & Lawler, J 2003, ‘Building effective organisations: Transformational leadership, collectivist orientation, work-related attitudes, and withdrawal behaviors in three emerging economies’, International Journal of Human Resource Management, vol. 14 no. 1, pp. 1083-1101.

Weber, J 2010, ‘Assessing the “Tone at the Top”: The moral reasoning of CEOs in the automobile industry’, Journal of business ethics, vol. 92 no. 2, pp. 167-182.

Wong, C & Law, K 2002, ‘The effects of leader and follower emotional intelligence on performance and attitude: An exploratory study’, Leadership Quarterly, vol. 13 no. 1, pp. 243-274.

Yoon, J 2008, Emotional intelligence and leadership effectiveness: The verbal and nonverbal communication behaviours of emotionally intelligent leaders, ProQuest LLC, Eisenhower.

Yoshino, M 1995, Strategic alliances: An entrepreneurial approach to globalisation, Harvard College, Cambridge.

Yoshino, M & Fagan, P 2003, ‘The Renault-Nissan Alliance’, Harvard Business School Case, vol. 9 no. 1, pp. 303-023.

Yukl, G 2002, Leadership in Organisations, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.

Yukl, G & Becker, W 2006, ‘Effective Empowerment in Organisations’, Organisation Management Journal vol. 3 no. 3, pp. 210-231.