DHL 2003 crash is an outstanding example of excellent airmanship. The primary cause of the accident is that the jetliner was hit by a missile that damaged its left wing. Pilots have lost control of flight controls and had to use engine power to make sure that landing is safe. One of the most important aspects that need to be noted is that the crew that the issue that it was an uncontained failure of the engine at first, but smoke was noticed. The primary cause of the incident that happened during Qantas Flight 32 in 2010 is that the engine rotor has failed, and the chain reaction has led to numerous other complications. The damage to the structure and systems was immense. It is extremely likely that airplanes would not be able to land safely under different conditions because such situations are rare and require lateral thinking.
We will write a custom Case Study on DHL & Qantas Flight 32: Teamwork and Creative Approaches specifically for you
301 certified writers online
The first accident could have been prevented if an anti-missile system was implemented. It needs to be said that it is especially important in this region because it is associated with terrorist activities. It is understandable that an attack was not expected, but it should have been considered as a major threat. The second accident could have been avoided if procedures that are related to monitoring of airplane parts were performed much more carefully. It could have been noticed that one the disks may become significantly larger than it is supposed to be under pressure, and it is one of the primary causes of this accident. Also, it is paramount to note that risk factors that are associated with the design of the parts should have been considered during the manufacturing process.
The recommendations are appropriate because a computer system that helps to make sure that an aircraft is landed safely in case of emergency is needed, and could have prevented numerous accidents. It needs to be said that the current technologies are incredibly efficient and were tested by time, but an introduction of an alternative is an excellent opportunity to guarantee the safety of aircraft.
The lesson that can be learned from the first case is that it is necessary to consider the risks that are related to the security of airplanes in particular regions, and it is important to introduce systems that would help to deal with similar attacks. One of the most important aspects that can be learned from the second case is that it is important to take necessary measures to make sure that the parts that do not meet the standards and not used during the construction of aircraft. Such instances are incredibly rare, but the possibility should not be disregarded because the safety of airplanes is of utmost importance.
It needs to be said that crew resource management (CRM) was essential in both cases because cooperation was of utmost importance, and it was necessary to come to a consensus on the decisions that were made. During the first accident, each crew member has focused on a particular task, and communication was especially important in this case. Furthermore, the aspects such as the amount of jet fuel had to be considered to achieve a positive outcome.
CRM was also paramount in the second instance. The duration of the process was nearly two hours, and it would be hard to keep composure if every member of the crew did not understand their responsibilities during the second accident. It is imperative to note that issues were solved because crews were well-trained and had significant experience that helped them to address the problems that appeared.
Both accidents can be used as examples of great CRM. The most significant aspect that needs to be discussed is that the sequencing of procedures was identified in both cases, and problems were addressed according to their importance. The use of differential thrust by the crew during the first accident was essential and required cooperation. It also needs to be said that it was paramount to use the resources that were available to their full potential.
Any mistake at that point could have been fatal, but crews were able to prevent tragedies because they utilized enhanced communication and other significant aspects of CRM. In the second case, the team has focused on the engine overheat, and it was the correct decision in this situation. The number of messages that appeared was truly astounding, and it was necessary to set priorities based on the information that they could access.
In conclusion, it is necessary to say that CRM had an enormous influence on the outcomes of both accidents, and an ability to keep composure in such stressful situations was especially important to make sure that there are no severe consequences. It is also imperative that these accidents have drawn attention to problems that are associated with civil turbine engines, and it is necessary to address them to prevent similar accidents in the future. Overall, teamwork and creative approaches were essential in both cases.