Cite this

Feminism is for Everybody: Passionate Politics Critical Essay

The Author’s Background

The book Feminism is for Everybody was written by bell hooks1. She is a famous American feminist and social activist who examines about such issues as gender, race, and capitalism in the modern society. It should be noted that bell hooks was born in Hopkinsville, a city located in Kentucky.

She lived in a working-class family; in particular, her father was a custodian, while her mother was a homemaker. Apart from that, she has six siblings. These are some of the main facts that should be taken into account while discussing the work of bell hooks and her major ideas.

One can say that the worldview of this author could be affected by various factors such the education in a racially segregated school. This experience can make a person extremely aware of inequalities existing in the community.

To a great extent, her worldview is based on the idea that existing social system creates of barriers which deny people access to equal opportunities. This is one of the central questions that this author examines.

Moreover, she believes that it is necessary to raise people’s awareness about various social problems. Overall, bell hooks rejects the idea of sexism or any other form of prejudice which can lead to discrimination against a person.

For instance, bell hooks represents the feminist movement, but she notes that this movement should not exclude men since this separation cannot support the common struggle against social injustice (Hooks, 2000).

In particular, in her opinion, males can also effectively promote the principles of equality in the society.

On the whole, this author believes that the feminist movement should include a diverse group of people who may represent different races, religions, genders, and social classes. These are some of the main issues that are frequently explored in bell hooks’ books.

There are several ideas that are of great importance to bell hooks. In particular, she believes that the categorization of people according to race, social class, or gender creates a system that prevents a person from raising his/her status in the community.

This is why it is important to describe and explain the relations between these phenomena. Apart from that, this author argues that intellectual do not play a sufficient role in refuting stereotypes regarding race or gender.

In many cases, the ideas of social activists are disregarded by less educated people. This is some of the obstacles that cannot be overlooked by social activities who are partly responsible for promoting equality in the community.

Various aspects of this idea are explored in many of her books such as Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center or Ain’t I a Woman? These are the main questions that attract the attention of this author.

At present, bell hooks is engaged in various activities. For example, she works as a visiting professor in many colleges and universities in the United States.

Additionally, she is strongly committed to writing. For example, she has recently published such a book as Belonging: A Culture of Place. Additionally, she regularly contributes articles to academic journals and mainstream newspapers.

On the whole, it is possible to argue that bell hooks is one of those people were able to popularize and define the main principles of the feminism.

Moreover, she is able to demonstrate that the connection between gender, race, as well as capitalism can explain various social problems faced by modern people.

These are some of main points that can be made. This information can help readers better understand the ideas that bell hooks expresses in her books.

The book analysis

There are several actions of this book which I found very interesting. Moreover, there are several ideas that seem to me very strong. In particular, one can speak the connection between race and gender because this question is vital for explaining various disparities in the modern community.

The author notes that for a long time the feminist movement was associated with white women who mostly came from well-to-do families (Hooks, 2000, p. 56).

However, insufficient attention was paid to the problems encountered by African-American women, who could be affected by several factors such racial discrimination, low income level, and subservient position in the society.

These are the main issues that have often been disregarded by social activists and writers (Hooks, 2000, p. 56). It seems that this approach to this problem is important for discussing the origins of social inequalities existing in the community.

Moreover, this perspective can be helpful to policy-makers who attempt to eliminate discrimination in the workplace or other areas. In particular, they should pay attention to the needs of women who belong to racial minorities.

Additionally, this issue should be taken into account by the leaders of the feminist movement. The problem is that this movement can often be disorganized in part because of disagreements regarding such questions as race and social class.

Therefore, bell hooks raises a question that is critical for feminist movement and its further development. In my opinion, this perspective is important for identifying and removing the barriers which contribute to existing social injustice.

Yet, there are several sections of the book that are not quite clear. In particular, the author examines the relations between feminism and spirituality. The author notes that many religions can be called patriarchal which means that they support the idea of male domination (Hooks, 2000, p. 107).

This is one of the topics that is examined by various feminist writers. Yet, bell hooks also speaks about the spiritual paths which can empower women and free them from the stereotypes according to women can only occupy subservient positions in families and societies.

Nevertheless, the author does not explain how these “alternative spiritual paths” should be organized for women (Hooks, 2000, p. 108). There is no description of possible alternatives to conventional religion.

Moreover, the author does not explain how the principles of feminism can be reconciled with many religious texts such as the Bible.

These are some of the main limitations that should be considered.

In my opinion, bell hooks should provide more evidence in order to illustrate her arguments regarding feminism and religion; otherwise this discussion appears to be slightly superficial or at least too vague. This is one of the main points that can be made.

Apart from that, this book does not identify the specific objectives that the feminist movement should attain. The author speaks much about the need to free women from patriarchal chains that prevent women from fulfilling their talents or raising their social status.

Nevertheless, bell hooks does not identify specific legal or social changes that should be brought about. One can say that the objectives identified by bell hooks are too abstract.

Moreover, the writer does not say how possible improvements should be attained and who should be responsible for this task. This is another issue that should be taken into consideration by the readers of this text.

The problem is that the absence of realistic and measurable objectives hinders the growth of the feminist movement. This is why this drawback should not be overlooked.

Yet, despite these limitations, one can still argue that bell hooks’ writing style is quite clear, and in most cases, the presentation is quite logical. This text can gain readers in-depth insights into the ideology of feminism.

Nevertheless, one can note that this work is more oriented toward people who take interest in the origins of this social movement and its implications. Furthermore, this book is more likely to appeal to people who share the ideas advocated by the feminists.

Nevertheless, this work can also throw light on various origins of inequality in the modern society. Therefore, this book can be of great interest to many readers.

One can argue that this work throws light on various aspects of modern feminism. This book is important for describing various ramifications of this social movement and its connection to religion, economics, and civil rights.

Apart from that, this book illustrates internal conflicts within feminism. In this case, one can speak about the lack of agreement about gender and race. More importantly, this text demonstrates that feminism can appeal to a very diverse group of people. This is why this book is worth attention.

Reference List

Hooks, B. (2000). Feminist is for Everybody: Passionate Politics. Cambridge: South End Press.


1 This is the penname of Gloria Jean Watkins. It should be noted that this author deliberately uses uncapitalized spelling of her penname.

This Critical Essay on Feminism is for Everybody: Passionate Politics was written and submitted by user Maya D. to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly.

Maya D. studied at Baylor University, USA, with average GPA 3.33 out of 4.0.

Need a custom Critical Essay sample written from scratch by
professional specifically for you?

Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar

301 certified writers online


Cite This paper

Select a referencing style:


D., M. (2019, December 28). Feminism is for Everybody: Passionate Politics [Blog post]. Retrieved from

Work Cited

D., Maya. "Feminism is for Everybody: Passionate Politics." IvyPanda, 28 Dec. 2019,

1. Maya D. "Feminism is for Everybody: Passionate Politics." IvyPanda (blog), December 28, 2019.


D., Maya. "Feminism is for Everybody: Passionate Politics." IvyPanda (blog), December 28, 2019.


D., Maya. 2019. "Feminism is for Everybody: Passionate Politics." IvyPanda (blog), December 28, 2019.


D., M. (2019) 'Feminism is for Everybody: Passionate Politics'. IvyPanda, 28 December.

More related papers