What Goyder mean by ‘technology as second self’
The significance of technology in the current world can hardly be assumed. Technology has introduced numerous processes, equipments, and other devices applicable and helpful in numerous economic sectors. As Goyder argues, technology has become inseparable to the humans’ undertakings in diverse ways (Goyder, 2004).
This is a considerable provision when analyzed critically. Goyder understands the importance of technology and how the phenomenon is transforming the world. Precisely technology has made remarkable contributions in the lives of numerous people since its inception.
Evidently, every sector globally requires technology in order to remain relevant and competitive in the current world (Holmes, 2005). This is a critical provision when considered decisively. From this context, it is important to support Goyder that ‘technology is a second self’. This phrase indicates how Goyder perceived technology in the context of its importance, relevancy, and connection to humanity in the current world.
Concurrently, it is crucial to agree that science provide us with knowledge meant to unravel current and future problems, which can only be solved by the establishment, ratification, and embracement of technology. Additionally, technology is vast and serves every sector with appropriateness based on its applicability.
According to Goyder, people can hardly do minus technology especially in the current and future world. Technology has become endemic to numerous people and in most operations (Restivo, 2005). The world has become manageable through the emergence and use of technology in various sectors.
This is evident in the context of communications (IT), trade, and globalization among other provisions steered to bring the world together. For this matter, the importance of technology cannot be assumed. In fact, individuals, organizations, states, and other entities need technology in order to progress (Jansen, 2002).
Similarly, this indicates how Goyder argues out his claims that ‘technology is a second self’. It is important to understand these provisions in various contexts as indicated earlier. Precisely, Goyder’s major arguments in this contexts relates to the significance of technology in the current world, its applicability, and relevancy in numerous contexts and sectors.
How technology can help or hinder society’s resiliency in terms of economics
Technology is important when considered in the economic context. Through it, numerous societies, countries, and regions can recover from economic challenges they might be facing regardless of the magnitude. This is relevant since technology is able to enhance various economic sectors while revitalizing their operations and viability. The contributions fronted by technology are vast especially in the economic sectors as indicated earlier.
Firstly, numerous job opportunities meant to enhance economy have been created through technology (Harrington, 2009). This is evident in the communication sectors, international transactions, trade opportunities, and other relevant business provisions capable of enhancing the aspects of economy. In this context, technology can help a society to become resilient in its economic undertakings despite the crisis.
This is applicable with regard to its appropriateness and contributions in various economic sectors when embraced aptly. Precisely, it is important to agree that an economy cannot suffer significantly if it establishes, ratifies, and nurtures the aspects of technology. It is possible recover easily and prominently from an economic meltdown (Chubin & Kumar, 2000).
This indicates the alleged resiliency in the economic context. Quick recovery from an economic challenge within a particular society is an important provision. It ensures that the society remains stable and resilient in the economic context. Concurrently, this is a critical economic provision posed by technology.
References
Chubin, D. & Kumar, D. (2000). Science, technology, and society: A sourcebook on research and practice. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
Goyder, J. (2004). Technology and society: A Canadian perspective. Peterborough: Broadview Press.
Harrington, J. (2009). Technology and society. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
Holmes, D. (2005). Communication theory: Media, technology, society. London: SAGE.
Jansen, S. (2002). Critical communication theory: New media, science, technology, and gender. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Restivo, S. (2005). Science, technology, and society. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.