Impact of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) on Society Essay

Weapon of mass destruction refer to the one that is in a position to cause damage to the people as well as to other forms of life in a given society (Franklin 1999). These weapons are normally referred to as the nuclear weapons like atomic bombs. The innovation of atomic bomb is one of the factors that has led to nations such as the United States to grow economically. These kinds of weapons have with time caused a number of massive damages to the world not only in the area of production but also to the entire world.

The weapons of mass destruction range from the chemical, biological to the nuclear ones. Japan was the first to conduct investigations on nuclear weapons and their outcomes were most markedly seen during the First World War. This progression of the weapons was as a result of the United States constitution promoting scientific inspiration along with the toxic weapons.

The term “weapons of mass destruction” included the chemical, biological as well as nuclear weapons (Clair 1998). By the end of this essay the reader will be in a position to know the origin, the applied science and technology as well as the implementation of atomic bombs.

The initial atomic bomb to explode was in Hiroshima city in Japan at nineteen forty five (Don 2005). This was an explosion that was adjacent to a target and was a surprise with no warning resulting into enormous destruction throughout the regions. The atomic bombs technology was a product of minute, plodding advancements that took place within a given duration (Foss 2002).

The resultant of the development of the bombs developed with time due to the nation embracing creative individuals from all parts of the world. Japan therefore was the source of atomic bombs being used today.

This was due to its government being in support of the innovations, what is more, there were no restrictions in the nation that could hinder the inventors from working towards the inventions. In addition to this, the country attracted scientists from all over the world hence more inventions resulted from the region, one of them being the atomic bombs.

The technology in atomic bombs to a great extent was driven by the customers’ demand; different nations being attacked by the various terrorists, continued to demand the weapons as a way of securing their nation hence, it became a necessity for various nations leading to the producers to increase the number of atomic bombs as the demand grew (Gert 2001).

In addition to this, the majority of the scientists in America by the eighteenth century had been concerned with the independence and coming up with a new nation. The struggle by these scientists led to more inventions thus more weapons

There were delayed demands on the weapons between the invention and the extensive spread due to some nations as well as different people having negative attitudes towards the bombs (Henry 1937). This was influenced by the damage caused by the first explosion that resulted to death of many people.

Some nations were also not ready to embrace the inventions and this was the reason why some nations proposed Iran to forbid the rights to produce the weapons. This was a negative impact on the demand of the atomic bombs as many nations took time before they could take in the act of buying the bombs. The demand was initially low since only a few could go purchasing the atomic bombs.

Politics has played a key role in the development of the bombs due to the reason that the US and the Western European administration supported and contributed to nuclear agenda in Iran via a program called Atoms of peace.

Also the United States constitution was in total support of the inventions, thus promoting a number of scientific inventors who consequently work hard to come up with new weapons. On the other hand, this was objected by the security council of UN who demanded that Iran needed to dangle their actions (Michael 1990). Thus, political influence was the determinant on the production of the atomic bombs.

The major financial investors in the technology were from private sectors as well as from taxes. According to an unknown NGO, over three hundred financial organizations, including Indian mechanized massive L&T played a role in supporting the atomic bombs innovations. Others comprise ICICI bank which offered the inventions with loans. Some of these financial supporters were either investors or lenders.

There were certain discoveries that led to developments of the bombs, one of them being the discovery of electricity hence the atomic bombs were later made. These inventors relied on the scientific hypothesis in their discoveries via conduction of a number of experiments using electricity (Smithson 1997).

The atomic bombs were not essentially made in the North America but they were invented in Japan; the idea spread to other nations, where the inventors came up with new technologies in making the atomic bomb. The atomic bombs are not only used in the entire world today.

Their massive destructions have attracted attention of many nations where some use them for terrorism while others use them for protection.

The users of bombs have faced risk including death as they experiment the devices. For instance, the first explosion in Hiroshima resulted to death of many people as it came when no one was warned against this explosion; people risked their lives by coming into contact with toxic materials used in making the atomic bombs since they emit radiations being harmful to humans (John 2009).

The level of adoption of the bombs is high as more inventors have come up, and the nations are free to purchase the weapons (Richard 2007). The technology is largely being consumed by laggards who aim at disrupting the nation’s peace.

In conclusion, the impacts of mass destruction is one issue that the world can control by placing certain measures to those making the bombs as well as to the nations purchasing the atomic bombs hence reducing the terrorists attacks (Jeffrey 2001).

A permanent council that would control the number of scientists coming up with the weapons ought to be made so as to manage the number of weapons made. Despite the positive effects of the bombs, there are more negative effects, thus the government must come up with restrictions on the number of bombs any nation acquires within a given time, thus reducing the number of deaths in the whole world.

References

Clair M. (1998). What Makes a Weapon One of Mass Destruction, 4^th ed. University of British Columbia Press.

Don M. (2005). Weapons of Mass Destruction Are Overrated as a Threat to America, 2^nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Foss & Nicolai J. (2002). United States Weapons of Mass Destruction Strategy, 2^nd ed. London. University Press.

Franklin M. (1999).Review of Intelligence on Weapons of Mass Destruction, 4^th ed. Chicago, The Los Angeles Times.

Gert G. (2001). Chemical and Biological Weapons: Use in Warfare, Impact on Society and Environment, 3^rd ed. Cambridge University Press.

Henry L. (1937). Biological Weapons Program – Japan, 2^nd ed.London. New York Times.

Jeffrey C. (2001). Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) Terrorism, 6^th ed. Oxford University Press.

John C. (2009). Weapons of Mass Deception, 1^st ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Michael W. (1990). Weapons of Mass Destruction: State Department Oversight of Science Centers Program, 3^rd ed. The New York Times.

Richard C. (2007). What is a Weapon of Mass Destruction, 7^th ed. Cambridge University Press.

Smithson E. (1997). The Chemical and Biological Terrorism Threat and the US Response, 4^th ed. Hillsdale College Press.