Racism: Do We Need More Stringent Laws? Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda®
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment

Summary

Racism has been a socially acute problem for many decades. Racial discrimination is a severe human rights issue in the United States that overlaps with all of the country’s domestic difficulties, from the disproportionately harsh sentences meted out for all types of crime, including violent offenses, to the disastrous War on Drugs (Jones, 2019). Unfortunately, the historical and current policies, practices, and conventions that establish and maintain white supremacy are directly responsible for today’s significant racial and ethnic imbalances.

Racism in American Laws

Racist Laws

Although racial discrimination is usually considered a part of social problems, racism is an integral part of American laws. Following the Civil War, state governments across the United States enacted a slew of laws aimed at segregating whites and non-whites. Jim Crow Laws, possibly the most comprehensive set of racist government practices, were enacted across the country. These regulations were intended to prevent not only the social mixing of races in public locations such as trains, lavatories, and even drinking fountains but also the physical and sexual mixing of races (Cole, 2021). That is, many Jim Crow laws dealt with “miscegenation,” or the mixing of races, and outlawed interracial marriage and personal connections (Cole, 2021). It is worth noting that these rules were enacted not simply to separate whites from blacks, but also to discriminate against other races.

Federal Law against Racism

Today, discrimination based on national origin, race, color, religion, disability, sex, or familial status is illegal under federal law. Discrimination based on a person’s birthplace, ancestry, culture, or language is banned under laws against national origin discrimination. This implies individuals cannot be denied break even with opportunity since they or their family are from another nation; they have a title or highlight related to a national beginning gather since they take an interest in certain traditions related to a national root gather They are hitched to or relate with individuals of a certain national root.

The Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice is worried that national origin discrimination in the U.S. may go undetected because victims of prejudice are unaware of their legal rights or are hesitant to complain to the government (Cole, 2021). To address this issue, the Gracious Rights Division has set up a National Beginning Working Gather to assist citizens and foreigners superior get it and work out their legitimate rights.

The Solution

Getting free of laws that contrarily and excessively influence certain races may be an imperative portion of finishing systemic prejudice. It isn’t enough to essentially recognize that a law incorporates a supremacist aim or impact; it has to be toppled. There are numerous illustrations of systemic bigotry around the world. Within the Joined together States, systemic prejudice is found in healthcare, managing an account, and instruction. Moreover, getting free of laws based on bigotry and outlined to maintain unequal results is essential for finishing systemic prejudice. Numerous individuals accept that society can halt bigotry by educating cherish and acknowledging it, but the reality is that indeed in the event that everybody ceased being supremacist overnight, the framework would still deliver results that excessively affect certain races. That’s since the frameworks were outlined with that particular aim indeed in the event that they didn’t expressly specify race. These unfair laws fortify supremacist convictions by making it much harder for marginalized bunches to break out of destitution, go to great schools, and get certain occupations. With systemic boundaries lifted, a person’s race stops being a deterrent that should be overcome.

References

Cole, J. (2021). Imagine Our Nation Without Racism: A Call for Action in the Academy. In Racism in American Public Life: A Call to Action (pp. 70-96). Charlottesville; London: University of Virginia Press. Web.

Jones, J. (2019).Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought, 52(3), 203-208. Web.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2022, October 21). Racism: Do We Need More Stringent Laws? https://ivypanda.com/essays/racism-do-we-need-more-stringent-laws/

Work Cited

"Racism: Do We Need More Stringent Laws?" IvyPanda, 21 Oct. 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/racism-do-we-need-more-stringent-laws/.

References

IvyPanda. (2022) 'Racism: Do We Need More Stringent Laws'. 21 October.

References

IvyPanda. 2022. "Racism: Do We Need More Stringent Laws?" October 21, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/racism-do-we-need-more-stringent-laws/.

1. IvyPanda. "Racism: Do We Need More Stringent Laws?" October 21, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/racism-do-we-need-more-stringent-laws/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Racism: Do We Need More Stringent Laws?" October 21, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/racism-do-we-need-more-stringent-laws/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
1 / 1