Strategy for Valid and Reliable Research
When conducting research, it is essential to identify strategies that will help achieve the most successful and effective results. Of particular importance are such characteristics as validity and reliability, which can be achieved only if the process of collecting and analyzing information is correctly constructed. Thus, this research paper will consider such strategies for providing these aspects as triangulation and researcher reflexivity. They are valuable because they provide an opportunity to limit biases and increase the level of validity and reliability of the study. The need for these indicators is that they ensure the correctness of the results of the study and increase the overall level of its quality.
Therefore, the first strategy that will be used in the framework of the study is triangulation. Research stated that it “can enrich research as it offers a variety of datasets to explain different aspects of a phenomenon of interest” and “can assist the confirming of a hypothesis where one set of findings confirms another set” (Noble & Heale, 2019, p. 67). Thus, this method is one of the most effective as it provides an opportunity to use mixed approaches to study the problem (Flick, 2018). Thus, with its help, a high degree of validity and reliability can be achieved.
Another strategy that has value in ensuring excellent trustworthiness and credibility of the study is to conduct researcher reflexivity. The peculiarity of this process is that it pays attention to and analyzes all the study components and their relations with the participants (Whitaker & Atkinson, 2019). Research underlined that it “increases the creditability of the findings but also deepens our understanding of the work” (Dodgson, 2019). In addition, an essential aspect of the researcher’s reflexivity strategy is the proclamation of possible biases and a description of how these will be addressed in the study.
Research Procedures
Several necessary procedures must be performed before proceeding to conduct any research. Thus, the first is acquiring institutional approval (IA) from the school district. In order to conduct the study, I will provide this body with the most up-to-date data that will represent the criticality and necessity of the study of the issue. Getting an Institutional Review Board becomes the next step after getting an IA. It consists in passing the mandatory online certification for researchers and providing a special commission with a form describing the project.
Further, it is necessary to determine how the study will go about soliciting participants. Online advertising will be used to attract individuals since, at the moment, many people use the Internet. After obtaining the correct number of participants, informed consent will be signed by them to participate in the experiment to comply with ethical standards (Sugiura et al., 2017). Moreover, the documents will provide data on the progress of the study, as well as on strategies and methods.
A form will be developed for individuals to fill out to collect the necessary information. It will be stored on secure electronic data carriers throughout the year and discharged in the presence of the experiment researchers. An obligatory step is to explain to the participants the essence and basics of conducting an experimental study. Therefore, the data will be collected using a literary review of evidence-based sources.
Further, the analysis will be carried out following the strategies of triangulation and researcher reflexivity. These steps will provide validity and reliability for the research and its results. Interviews will not be conducted due to the availability of forms for participants. It is important to emphasize that individuals who will become part of the scientific work should clearly understand the procedures and expected results of the work.
References
Dodgson, J. E. (2019). Reflexivity in qualitative research. Journal of Human Lactation, 35(2), 220-222. Web.
Flick, U. (2018). Doing triangulation and mixed methods. Sage.
Noble, H., & Heale, R. (2019). Triangulation in research, with examples. Evidence-Based Nursing, 22(3), 67-68. Web.
Sugiura, L., Wiles, R., & Pope, C. (2017). Ethical challenges in online research: Public/private perceptions. Research Ethics, 13(3-4), 184-199. Web.
Whitaker, E. M., & Atkinson, P. A. (2019). Reflexivity. SAGE Publishing.