Overview
Conclusion
The necessity to reform the current approach to developing the students’ critical thinking skills in the classroom is reflected explicitly or implicitly in Payne and Gainey and Tsui’s articles. If Tsui only states the perspectives according to which it is possible to reform the existing approach to enhance the students’ critical thinking abilities with references to the conducted research, Payne and Gainey provide the concrete strategies and ways to improve the critical thinking development with the help of the proposed list of controversial topics (Payne & Gainey, 2003; Tsui, 2002). From this point, the authors use different approaches to proposing the solutions to the problematic question, while focusing on the theoretical implications or on the concrete actions.
However, Payne and Gainey’s ideas are similar to Tsui’s claims that it is important to change the instructors’ approach to the issue in order to influence the development of the students’ critical thinking skills. The authors present the same idea in different forms, thus, today instructors can hesitate and even fail while developing the instructions or activities based on the critical thinking concepts because of the impossibility to monitor the discussion or writing appropriately. From this point, the authors propose approaches to overcome the situation, but they use different techniques.
References
Payne, B., & Gainey, R. (2003). Understanding and developing controversial issues in college courses. College Teaching, 51(2), 52-59.
Tsui, L. (2002). Fostering critical thinking through effective pedagogy: Evidence from four institutional case studies. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(6), 740-763.